Outcomes of intramedullary nailing versus plate fixation for humeral shaft fractures: a retrospective cohort study

被引:0
作者
Derbas, Jawad [1 ]
Moghamis, Isam [1 ]
Alzobi, Osama [1 ]
Elshoeibi, Amgad [2 ]
Murshid, Abdullah [1 ]
Ahmed, Ghalib [1 ]
机构
[1] Hamad Gen Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Doha, Qatar
[2] Qatar Univ, Coll Med, QU Hlth, Doha, Qatar
关键词
Humerus shaft; Fracture; DCP; IMN; Functional outcome; NONOPERATIVE TREATMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s00590-025-04181-z
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Humeral shaft fractures account for 1-3% of all bone fractures. Conservative treatment often leads to complications such as non-union and shoulder stiffness. Surgical fixation with a dynamic compression plate (DCP) has been the gold standard treatment. Intramedullary nailing (IMN) has recently gained popularity due to its minimally invasive approach and reduced risk of radial nerve injury. This study aims to compare the outcomes of IMN and plate fixation for humeral shaft fractures. Methods This retrospective study included patients with humeral shaft fractures treated with either IMN or DCP fixation at Hamad General Hospital between April 2015 and October 2018. Patient demographics, fracture characteristics, surgical outcomes, and complications were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient information, and univariate analysis was conducted to compare both groups. A Cox proportional hazards model, adjusted for age, gender, and polytrauma status was applied to compare time to union between IMN and DCP groups. Results Sixty five patients (25 IMN, 40 plate fixation) were included. Non-union rates were higher in the DCP group than in the IMN group (13% vs. 4%). Reoperation rates were also higher in the DCP group (20% vs. 4%). Postoperative neuropathy rates were 4% for IMN and 10% for DCP, with neuropathy resolution significantly higher in the IMN group (92% vs. 68%). Shoulder range of motion (ROM) and pain favored the DCP group, with 98% unaffected ROM in the plate group compared to 76% in the IMN group (p = 0.007), and a lower incidence of shoulder pain (28% vs. 98%, p < 0.001). Time to union was comparable between both groups, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.08 (95% CI 0.62-1.90; p = 0.776). Conclusion IMN and plate fixation effectively achieved fracture union; however, plate fixation was associated with better shoulder function, reduced pain, and higher reoperation rates. IMN was linked to a lower risk of nerve injury but compromised shoulder ROM and resulted in more postoperative pain.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fixation stability of comminuted humeral shaft fractures: Locked intramedullary nailing versus plate fixation
    Chen, AL
    Joseph, TN
    Wolinksy, PR
    Tejwani, NC
    Kummer, FJ
    Egol, KA
    Koval, KJ
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2002, 53 (04): : 733 - 737
  • [2] Comparison of Expandable and Locked Intramedullary Nailing for Humeral Shaft Fractures
    Akdemir, Mehmet
    Bicen, Cagdas
    Ozkan, Mustafa
    Ekin, Ahmet
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (10)
  • [3] Flexible intramedullary nailing for treatment of proximal humeral and humeral shaft fractures in children: A retrospective series of 118 cases
    Pogorelic, Z.
    Kadic, S.
    Milunovic, K. P.
    Pintaric, I.
    Jukic, M.
    Furlan, D.
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2017, 103 (05) : 765 - 770
  • [4] Early post-operative outcomes of plate versus nail fixation for humeral shaft fractures
    Putnam, Jill G.
    Nowak, Lauren
    Sanders, David
    MacNevin, Melanie
    Lawendy, Abdel-Rahman
    Jones, Clifford
    McKee, Michael
    Schemitsch, Emil
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2019, 50 (08): : 1460 - 1463
  • [5] Humeral Shaft Fracture: Intramedullary Nailing
    Konda, Sanjit R.
    Saleh, Hesham
    Fisher, Nina
    Egol, Kenneth A.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2017, 31 : S38 - S38
  • [6] Comparative Outcomes of Intramedullary Nailing Versus Plate Fixation in the Management of Both-Bone Forearm Fractures
    Sharma, Ashish
    Singh, Vanchhit
    Yadav, Mulayam Singh
    Gidwani, Gaurav
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2025, 17 (SUPPL 1) : S275 - S277
  • [7] Complications following intramedullary nailing of proximal humerus and humeral shaft fractures: a systematic review
    Lunn, Kiera
    Hurley, Eoghan T.
    Adu-Kwarteng, Kwabena
    Welch, Jessica M.
    Levin, Jay M.
    Anakwenze, Oke
    Boachie-Adjei, Yaw
    Klifto, Christopher S.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2025, 34 (02) : 626 - 638
  • [8] Operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures. Comparison of plating and intramedullary nailing
    Denies, Erwin
    Nijs, Stefaan
    Sermon, An
    Broos, Paul
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA BELGICA, 2010, 76 (06): : 735 - 742
  • [9] Femoral shaft fractures——Reamed versus unreamed intramedullary nailing
    James F.Kellam
    Ladislav Nagy
    Rodrigo F.Pesantez
    中华创伤骨科杂志, 2004, (09) : 92 - 94
  • [10] Effectiveness and Safety of Traditional Open Reduction and Internal Fixation vs. Intramedullary Nailing in the Treatment of Humeral Shaft Fractures
    Xu, Zhong
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 85 (04) : 239 - 245