Concatenating data-driven and reduced-physics models for smart production forecasting

被引:0
作者
Ogali, Oscar Ikechukwu Okoronkwo [1 ]
Orodu, Oyinkepreye David [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Port Harcourt, Dept Petr & Gas Engn, Choba, Rivers, Nigeria
[2] KEOT Synergy Ltd, Lagos, Nigeria
关键词
Hybrid models; Machine learning; Production forecasting; Artificial Intelligence; Capacitance-Resistance Model; Petroleum Reservoir Management; INFERRING INTERWELL CONNECTIVITY; CAPACITANCE-RESISTANCE MODEL; EXTREME LEARNING-MACHINE; NEURAL-NETWORKS; RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION; FLOODING PERFORMANCE; WATERFLOOD PERFORMANCE; HYDROCARBON RESERVOIR; SEISMIC ATTRIBUTES; ENSEMBLE MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s12145-025-01745-9
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Production forecasting is vital for petroleum reservoir management but remains challenging. This study combines the Capacitance-Resistance Model (CRM) (a reduced physics model) with machine learning (ML) (or data-driven) approaches - dubbed CRM-ML hybrids - to enhance production forecast accuracy in petroleum reservoirs. Using both synthetic field (synfield) and real field data, four ML approaches (Nu-Support Vector Machine, NuSVM, Extreme Gradient Boost, XGB, Extreme Learning Machine, ELM, and Multilayer Perceptron, MLP) were tested. Considering all 560 evaluations, the CRM-ML hybrids generally outperformed standalone ML approaches, with the CRM-XGB hybrid achieving the lowest mean absolute error of 7.2 barrels per day. The findings reveal that hybrid models improve production forecasts, with performance influenced by well-specific operational and reservoir factors. Despite possible challenges with interpretability and computational costs, this integration demonstrates the potential for leveraging reduced-physics models and ML for better reservoir predictions.
引用
收藏
页数:45
相关论文
共 203 条
[1]   Hybrid machine learning algorithms to predict condensate viscosity in the near wellbore regions of gas condensate reservoirs [J].
Abad, Abouzar Rajabi Behesht ;
Mousavi, Seyedmohammadvahid ;
Mohamadian, Nima ;
Wood, David A. ;
Ghorbani, Hamzeh ;
Davoodi, Shadfar ;
Alvar, Mehdi Ahmadi ;
Shahbazi, Khalil .
JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2021, 95
[2]  
Ahmadi Mohammad Ali, 2016, Petroleum, V2, P177, DOI 10.1016/j.petlm.2015.10.002
[3]  
Ahmadi MA., 2015, PETROLEUM, V1, P118
[4]   Comparison of machine learning methods for estimating permeability and porosity of oil reservoirs via petro-physical logs (vol 5, pg 271, 2019) [J].
Ahmadi, Mohammad Ali .
PETROLEUM, 2021, 7 (02) :271-284
[5]  
Ahmed T, 2016, Equations of State and PVT Analysis: Applications for Improved Reservoir Modeling, P1, DOI [10.1016/C2014-0-00119-0, DOI 10.1016/C2014-0-00119-0]
[6]   Multilayer Neural Network with Multi-Valued Neurons in time series forecasting of oil production [J].
Aizenberg, Igor ;
Sheremetov, Leonid ;
Villa-Vargas, Luis ;
Martinez-Munoz, Jorge .
NEUROCOMPUTING, 2016, 175 :980-989
[7]   Performance evaluation of boosting machine learning algorithms for lithofacies classification in heterogeneous carbonate reservoirs [J].
Al-Mudhafar, Watheq J. ;
Abbas, Mohammed A. ;
Wood, David A. .
MARINE AND PETROLEUM GEOLOGY, 2022, 145
[8]  
Al-Najem AA, 2012, P 2012 SPE SAUD AR S, DOI [10.2118/160894-MS, DOI 10.2118/160894-MS]
[9]   A deep gated recurrent neural network for petroleum production forecasting [J].
Al-Shabandar, Raghad ;
Jaddoa, Ali ;
Liatsis, Panos ;
Hussain, Abir Jaafar .
MACHINE LEARNING WITH APPLICATIONS, 2021, 3
[10]   Inferring interwell connectivity only from well-rate fluctuations in waterfloods [J].
Albertoni, A ;
Lake, LW .
SPE RESERVOIR EVALUATION & ENGINEERING, 2003, 6 (01) :6-16