The benefits of Indigenous-led social science: a mindset for Arctic sustainability

被引:0
作者
Brooks, Jeffrey J. [1 ,2 ]
Renick, Hillary E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Bur Ocean Energy Management, Off Environm, Environm Sci Management, Anchorage, AK 99503 USA
[2] Bur Ocean Energy Management, Off Environm Programs, Div Environm Assessment, Sterling, VA 20166 USA
[3] Bur Ocean Energy Management, Off Environm Programs, Environm Sci Div, Sterling, VA USA
来源
HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS | 2024年 / 11卷 / 01期
关键词
RESEARCH ETHICS; KNOWLEDGE; PLACE; WESTERN;
D O I
10.1057/s41599-024-04127-6
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The Peoples of the Arctic and Arctic health and sustainability are highly interconnected and essentially one and the same. An appropriate path to a sustainable Arctic involves a shift away from individual learning and achieving toward community leadership and the betterment of society. This article draws upon mindset theory from Western psychology and Indigenous relational accountability to propose and outline a model for achieving sustainability in the Arctic. The geographic focus is the North American Arctic. The principles of the argument and the foundations of the model may apply across the Circumpolar North. The paper is a call to action for social scientists and policy makers in the Arctic to implement an Indigenous-led and self-determined social science. Empowering and supporting Indigenous leaders and scholars to direct and conduct autonomous social science research would inherently produce well-being and sustainability for Indigenous communities and regions. The arguments are supported by an inductive analysis of peer-reviewed literature, and the model is organized and illustrated using a schematic of concentric circles. The foundational elements of the model include: Indigenous sovereignty, Indigenous ontology, Indigenous models of sustainability, and Indigenous scholarship. Environmental scientists, resource managers, and policy makers are directed to better understand, accept, and support Indigenous science as a comprehensive and valid knowledge system; change how they use key terminology in research; rethink research roles; and amend processes and timelines for research development and funding. To achieve the desired outcomes for community well-being and Arctic sustainability, Arctic social scientists should seriously consider centering Indigenous science, especially in Indigenous communities.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 97 条
  • [1] Anderson Shelby., 2018, Arctic Horizons: Final Report
  • [2] Qualitative analysis at the interface of Indigenous and Western knowledge systems: the Herringbone stitch model
    Andrews, Shawana
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (06) : 939 - 956
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2007, UN DECL RIGHTS IND P
  • [4] Archibald JA, 2008, INDIGENOUS STORYWORK: EDUCATING THE HEART, MIND, BODY, AND SPIRIT, P1
  • [5] Indigenous knowledge systems and Alaska native ways of knowing
    Barnhardt, R
    Kawagley, AO
    [J]. ANTHROPOLOGY & EDUCATION QUARTERLY, 2005, 36 (01) : 8 - 23
  • [6] Barnhardt R, North by 2020: perspectives on Alaska's changing social-ecological systems, P151
  • [7] Barnhardt R, 2011, NORTH BY 2020: PERSPECTIVES ON ALASKA'S CHANGING SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS, P57
  • [8] Fusion of horizons: Realizing a meaningful understanding in qualitative research
    Bartley, Kevin A.
    Brooks, Jeffrey J.
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH, 2023, 23 (04) : 940 - 961
  • [9] Indigenous self-determination in cryospheric science: The Inuit-led Sikumik Qaujimajjuti ("tools to know how the ice is") program in Inuit Nunangat, Canada
    Beaulieu, L.
    Arreak, A.
    Holwell, R.
    Dicker, S.
    Qamanirq, O.
    Moorman, L.
    Wilson, K.
    Segal, R.
    Crichton, S.
    Bell, T.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2023, 11
  • [10] Bielawski Ellen., 1992, NO PERSPECTIVES, V20, P5