What do academics have to say about ChatGPT? A text mining analytics on the discussions regarding ChatGPT on research writing

被引：0
作者：
Rex Bringula [1 ]
机构：
[1] University of the East,College of Computer Studies and Systems
来源：
AI and Ethics | 2025年 / 5卷 / 1期
关键词：
Artificial intelligence; Chatbot; Natural language processing; Opinion mining;
D O I：
10.1007/s43681-023-00354-w
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
This study employed text mining analytics to determine the perceptions of academics (e.g., scholars, teachers, educators, and researchers) regarding ChatGPT in research writing. Toward this goal, research articles relating to the use of ChatGPT in research writing were collected from Scopus and Google Scholar. Using keywords and the criteria set forth, 86 selected peer- and non-peer-reviewed articles were published between 2022 and 2023. All except one paper were published in a scientific journal. It was shown that ChatGPT is a valuable tool for content generation and could provide quick feedback from a text-based inquiry. Support and content generation, publication ethics, and the duality of ChatGPT were the three themes discovered using topic modeling. The top concern of academics was that it could facilitate plagiarism. Overall, the sentiment score was positive, implying that the academic community has a favorable perception of this novel technology. Recommendations and implications are offered.
引用
收藏
页码：371 / 383
页数：12
相关论文
共 119 条
[11]  
Hendricks S(2023)Artificial intelligence bot ChatGPT in medical research: the potential game changer as a double-edged sword Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 6 65-132
[12]  
Hespanhol L(2022)Evaluating urgency of typhoon-related tweets through sentiment analysis using artificial neural networks Int. J. Comput. Sci. Res. 5 124-403
[13]  
Verhagen E(2021)EFL students’ perception on the use of grammarly and teacher feedback JEES 53 395-31493
[14]  
Memon AR(2021)Grammarly as AI-powered English writing assistant: students’ alternative for writing English Metathesis J. Engl. Lang. Lit. Teach. 12 31480-31
[15]  
Aujero J(2010)Relative status of journal and conference publications in computer science Commun. ACM. ACM 10 10-426
[16]  
Cruz N(2018)The role of grammarly in assessing English as a foreign language (EFL) writing Lingua Cult. 10 417-1154
[17]  
Padilla J(2023)Artificial intelligence in academic writing: a paradigm-shifting technological advance Nat. Rev. Urol. 72 1148-762
[18]  
Pineda M(2022)Exploratory analysis of topic interests and their evolution in bioinformatics research using semantic text mining and probabilistic topic modeling IEEE Access 13 723-30
[19]  
Legaspi J(2022)The QuillBot grammar checker: friend or foe of ESL student writers? J. Creat. Pract. Lang. Learn. Teach. 50 24-451
[20]  
Vicente H(2019)What do hotel customers complain about? Text analysis using structural topic model Tour. Manag.Manag. 9 437-6
12345678910