Effect of printing orientation and resin thickness on flexural strength of direct 3D-printed aligners

被引:1
作者
Khalil, Ahmed S. [1 ]
Zaher, Abbas R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Alexandria Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Orthodont, POB 21521,Champoll St, Alexandria, Egypt
关键词
Clear aligners; Direct printed aligners; Printing orientation; Mechanical properties; Flexural strength; ACCURACY; APPLIANCES; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1186/s12903-025-05556-8
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
BackgroundDirect 3D-printed aligners served as a breakthrough era in clear aligner fabrication. Yet, there is a scarcity of studies evaluating their mechanical properties. The aim of this study was to compare direct 3D-printed aligners derived from different printing orientations (vertically, horizontally, 30, and 45 degrees) and thickness (0.5 and 0.7 mm) in terms of flexural strength.MethodsThis laboratory-based comparative study utilized 96 aligner flat specimens. They were designed, supported, and directly printed using shape memory resin, then randomly allocated into 8 groups. Group 1 (A, B, C, and D): 0.5 mm thickness printed vertically, horizontally, 30, and 45 degrees, respectively. Group 2 (A, B, C, and D): 0.7 mm thickness printed vertically, horizontally, 30, and 45 degrees, respectively. Each aligner specimen was placed on a custom-made bending jig, with the whole setup enclosed in a temperature-controlled water bath. Three-point bending test was performed using a universal testing machine, and the resulting force was recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using Student t-test for resin thickness comparison and one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc test for comparison between printing orientations. Statistical significance was set at p <= 0.05.ResultsNo statistically significant differences were found between vertically, horizontally, 30, and 45 degrees printed aligner specimens. Aligner specimens of 0.7 mm thickness demonstrated significantly higher flexural strength values compared to those of 0.5 mm thickness.ConclusionsPrinting orientation did not alter the flexural strength of the direct 3D-printed aligner flat specimens, regardless of whether they were printed vertically, horizontally, or at angles of 30 or 45 degrees relative to the printer build plate. Additionally, specimens with a thickness of 0.7 mm exhibited higher bending resistance compared to those with a thickness of 0.5 mm.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Digital model superimpositions: are different software algorithms equally accurate in quantifying linear tooth movements? [J].
Adel, Samar M. ;
Vaid, Nikhilesh R. ;
El-Harouni, Nadia ;
Kassem, Hassan ;
Zaher, Abbas R. .
BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2022, 22 (01)
[2]   TIP, TORQUE & ROTATIONS: How accurately do digital superimposition software packages quantify tooth movement? [J].
Adel, Samar M. ;
Vaid, Nikhilesh R. ;
El-Harouni, Nadia ;
Kassem, Hassan ;
Zaher, Abbas R. .
PROGRESS IN ORTHODONTICS, 2022, 23 (01)
[3]   Fabrication of a resin appliance with alloy components using digital technology without an analog impression [J].
Al Mortadi, Noor ;
Jones, Quentin ;
Eggbeer, Dominic ;
Lewis, Jeffrey ;
Williams, Robert J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2015, 148 (05) :862-867
[4]   Effect of Printing Orientation and Postcuring Time on the Flexural Strength of 3D-Printed Resins [J].
Al-Dulaijan, Yousif A. ;
Alsulaimi, Leenah ;
Alotaibi, Reema ;
Alboainain, Areej ;
Akhtar, Sultan ;
Khan, Soban Q. ;
Al-Ghamdi, Maram ;
Gad, Mohammed M. .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2023, 32 :45-52
[5]   In-house 3D-printed aligners: effect of in vivo ageing on mechanical properties [J].
Can, Esad ;
Panayi, Nearchos ;
Polychronis, Georgios ;
Papageorgiou, Spyridon N. ;
Zinelis, Spiros ;
Eliades, George ;
Eliades, Theodore .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2022, 44 (01) :51-55
[6]  
Elkholy F., 2019, J Healthc Eng, V29, P101
[7]   Effect of print layer height and printer type on the accuracy of 3-dimensional printed orthodontic models [J].
Favero, Christian S. ;
English, Jeryl D. ;
Cozad, Benjamin E. ;
Wirthlin, John O. ;
Short, Megan M. ;
Kasper, F. Kurtis .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2017, 152 (04) :557-565
[8]   Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Orthodontic Retainers [J].
Firlej, Marcel ;
Zaborowicz, Katarzyna ;
Zaborowicz, Maciej ;
Firlej, Ewa ;
Domagala, Ivo ;
Pieniak, Daniel ;
Igielska-Kalwat, Joanna ;
Dmowski, Artur ;
Biedziak, Barbara .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (09)
[9]   THE PHYSICAL-PROPERTIES OF A POLYACETAL DENTURE RESIN [J].
FITTON, JS ;
DAVIES, EH ;
HOWLETT, JA ;
PEARSON, GJ .
CLINICAL MATERIALS, 1994, 17 (03) :125-129
[10]   Patient satisfaction and quality of life status after 2 treatment modalities: lnvisalign and conventional fixed appliances [J].
Flores-Mir, Carlos ;
Brandelli, Jeremy ;
Pacheco-Pereira, Camila .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2018, 154 (05) :639-644