Diagnostic accuracy of deep learning in prediction of osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Amani, Firouz [1 ]
Amanzadeh, Masoud [2 ]
Hamedan, Mahnaz [3 ]
Amani, Paniz [4 ]
机构
[1] Ardabil Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Dept Community Med, Ardebil, Iran
[2] Ardabil Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Informat Management, Ardebil, Iran
[3] Ardabil Univ Med Sci, Ardebil, Iran
[4] Tabriz Univ, Elect Engn, Tabriz, Iran
关键词
Osteoporosis; BMD; Deep learning; Machine learning; Diagnosis;
D O I
10.1186/s12891-024-08120-7
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundOsteoporosis is one of the most common metabolic diseases that is characterized by a decrease in bone density and a loss of the quality of the bone structure. The use of deep learning in the prediction of osteoporosis can provide a non-invasive, cost-effective, and efficient approach. The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of deep learning in the prediction of osteoporosis.MethodsThis is a systematic review and meta-analysis study that was conducted on the diagnostic accuracy of deep learning algorithms for predicting osteoporosis. A literature search was performed in electronic databases including PubMed, Elsevier, and Google Scholar to identify relevant articles until December 1, 2023. Articles were searched in databases by combining related terms such as "deep learning", "convolutional neural network", and "osteoporosis". We conducted title, abstract, and full-text screening based on inclusion/exclusion criteria. Various metrics, such as sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC), were used to assess the diagnostic performance of deep learning models.ResultsOut of the 181 articles initially identified, 10 studies were included in the analysis. All studies used a convolutional neural network (CNN) as the deep learning model. Three studies investigated multiple deep learning models. Eight studies used various architectures of CNN, such as ResNet, VGG, and EfficientNet. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.86 (95% CI, 0.82-0.89) and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.85-0.91), respectively. The bivariate approach's pooled SROC curve produced an AUC of 0.94 (95% CI 0.91-0.95). The Diagnostic Odds Ratio (DOR) for the deep learning models was 49.09 (95% CI, 28.74-83.84). Deeks' funnel plot asymmetry test (P = 0.4) suggested no potential publication bias.ConclusionsDeep learning has an acceptable performance for the diagnosis of osteoporosis, even better than other ML algorithms. However, further research is needed to validate the findings of this study in clinical trials.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [11] Osteoporosis: A Silent Disease with Complex Genetic Contribution
    Golchin, Maryam Mafi
    Heidari, Laleh
    Ghaderian, Seyyed Mohammad Hossein
    Akhavan-Niaki, Haleh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENETICS AND GENOMICS, 2016, 43 (02) : 49 - 61
  • [12] Osteoporosis Screening, Prevention, and Management
    Golob, Anna L.
    Laya, Mary B.
    [J]. MEDICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2015, 99 (03) : 587 - +
  • [13] Deep-Learning-Based Detection of Vertebral Fracture and Osteoporosis Using Lateral Spine X-Ray Radiography
    Hong, Namki
    Cho, Sang Wouk
    Shin, Sungjae
    Lee, Seunghyun
    Jang, Seol A.
    Roh, Seunghyun
    Lee, Young Han
    Rhee, Yumie
    Cummings, Steven R. R.
    Kim, Hwiyoung
    Kim, Kyoung Min
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2023, 38 (06) : 887 - 895
  • [14] Automated bone mineral density prediction and fracture risk assessment using plain radiographs via deep learning
    Hsieh, Chen-, I
    Zheng, Kang
    Lin, Chihung
    Mei, Ling
    Lu, Le
    Li, Weijian
    Chen, Fang-Ping
    Wang, Yirui
    Zhou, Xiaoyun
    Wang, Fakai
    Xie, Guotong
    Xiao, Jing
    Miao, Shun
    Kuo, Chang-Fu
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 12 (01)
  • [15] USERS GUIDES TO THE MEDICAL LITERATURE .3. HOW TO USE AN ARTICLE ABOUT A DIAGNOSTIC-TEST .B. WHAT ARE THE RESULTS AND WILL THEY HELP ME IN CARING FOR MY PATIENTS
    JAESCHKE, R
    GUYATT, GH
    SACKETT, DL
    GUYATT, G
    BASS, E
    BRILLEDWARDS, P
    BROWMAN, G
    COOK, D
    FARKOUH, M
    GERSTEIN, H
    HAYNES, B
    HAYWARD, R
    HOLBROOK, A
    JUNIPER, E
    LEE, H
    LEVINE, M
    MOYER, V
    NISHIKAWA, J
    OXMAN, A
    PATEL, A
    PHILBRICK, J
    RICHARDSON, WS
    SAUVE, S
    SACKETT, D
    SINCLAIR, J
    TROUT, KS
    TUGWELL, P
    TUNIS, S
    WALTER, S
    WILSON, M
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 271 (09): : 703 - 707
  • [16] Prediction of osteoporosis from simple hip radiography using deep learning algorithm
    Jang, Ryoungwoo
    Choi, Jae Ho
    Kim, Namkug
    Chang, Jae Suk
    Yoon, Pil Whan
    Kim, Chul-Ho
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [17] Machine Learning and Data Mining Methods in Diabetes Research
    Kavakiotis, Ioannis
    Tsave, Olga
    Salifoglou, Athanasios
    Maglaveras, Nicos
    Vlahavas, Ioannis
    Chouvarda, Ioanna
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL AND STRUCTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL, 2017, 15 : 104 - 116
  • [18] Deep Learning Applications in Medical Image Analysis
    Ker, Justin
    Wang, Lipo
    Rao, Jai
    Lim, Tchoyoson
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2018, 6 : 9375 - 9389
  • [19] Larijani B, 2005, J Reprod Infertility, V6
  • [20] Diagnostic and Gradation Model of Osteoporosis Based on Improved Deep U-Net Network
    Liu, Jian
    Wang, Jian
    Ruan, Weiwei
    Lin, Chengshan
    Chen, Daguo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SYSTEMS, 2020, 44 (01)