Performance Evaluation of Hybrid Cloud-Fog Computing Architectures in Smart Home IoT Environments: A Comparative Simulation Study Across Multiple Tools

被引:0
作者
Ruchika [1 ]
Chhillar, Rajender Singh [1 ]
机构
[1] Maharshi Dayanand Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Applicat, Rohtak 124001, Haryana, India
关键词
IoT; Fog computing; Cloud computing; Smart home; Simulation tools; Energy consumption; Execution time; Resource utilization; RESOURCE-MANAGEMENT; THINGS IOT; INTERNET; EDGE; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1007/s10723-025-09802-9
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This study evaluates a hybrid cloud-fog computing architecture within a smart home environment consisting of 50 IoT devices. The performance is assessed using seven simulation tools: MATLAB, iFogSim, EdgeCloudSim, YAFS, FogNetSim++, PureEdgeSim, and LEAF. Simulation results demonstrate that distributing tasks between two fog nodes significantly reduces the execution time of high-priority tasks to approximately 0.0009 s. In contrast, MATLAB's single-node approach achieves an execution time of 0.001 s but results in excessive CPU utilization, with Fog Node 1 reaching 90% usage and consuming up to 25,935 kWh. Task distribution between Fog Node 1 and Fog Node 2 achieves a more balanced load, with CPU utilization reduced to approximately 70% on one node and 20% on the other. This balanced allocation leads to a per-node energy reduction of around 20%. Cloud usage remains steady at 15% CPU utilization, indicating that offloading lower-priority tasks to the cloud has minimal impact on overall energy consumption. The redistribution of tasks also reduces memory usage, as the utilization of Fog Node 2 drops to approximately 10% when workloads are distributed. Findings highlight that achieving balanced resource allocation is critical for reducing latency, improving energy efficiency, and maintaining steady throughput across simulation tools. Comparative results indicate that iFogSim, EdgeCloudSim, YAFS, FogNetSim++, PureEdgeSim, and LEAF offer greater scalability and energy efficiency than MATLAB, particularly for large-scale deployments. The insights from this study can be extended to other IoT domains, such as healthcare and industrial automation, where latency optimization and resource efficiency remain paramount.
引用
收藏
页数:43
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   A comparative analysis of simulators for the Cloud to Fog continuum [J].
Abreu, David Perez ;
Velasquez, Karima ;
Curado, Marilia ;
Monteiro, Edmundo .
SIMULATION MODELLING PRACTICE AND THEORY, 2020, 101
[2]   Proactive content caching in edge computing environment: A review [J].
Aghazadeh, Rafat ;
Shahidinejad, Ali ;
Ghobaei-Arani, Mostafa .
SOFTWARE-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE, 2023, 53 (03) :811-855
[3]  
Alam Mahfooz, 2023, 2023 International Conference on Computing, Communication, and Intelligent Systems (ICCCIS), P829, DOI 10.1109/ICCCIS60361.2023.10425507
[4]   FollowMe@LS: Electricity price and source aware resource management in geographically distributed heterogeneous datacenters [J].
Ali, Hashim ;
Zakarya, Muhammad ;
Rahman, Izaz Ur ;
Khan, Ayaz Ali ;
Buyya, Rajkumar .
JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 2021, 175
[5]   The Internet of Things: A survey [J].
Atzori, Luigi ;
Iera, Antonio ;
Morabito, Giacomo .
COMPUTER NETWORKS, 2010, 54 (15) :2787-2805
[6]  
Bajaj Karan, 2022, 2022 International Conference on Sustainable Computing and Data Communication Systems (ICSCDS), P983, DOI 10.1109/ICSCDS53736.2022.9760897
[7]  
Belmahdi R., 2021, Ingenierie des Systemes d Inf, V24, P211
[8]  
Bonomi F., 2012, P 1 EDIT MCC WORKSH, P13, DOI DOI 10.1145/2342509.2342513
[9]   Fog and IoT: An Overview of Research Opportunities [J].
Chiang, Mung ;
Zhang, Tao .
IEEE INTERNET OF THINGS JOURNAL, 2016, 3 (06) :854-864
[10]  
Dastjerdi AV, 2016, INTERNET THINGS, P61, DOI [DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-805395-9.00004-6.ARXIV:1601.02752, 10.1016/B978-0-12-805395-9.00004-6, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-805395-9.00004-6]