AI-Based Ethics Index of Russian Banks

被引:0
作者
Storchevoy, M. [1 ]
Parshakov, P. [2 ,3 ]
Paklina, S. [2 ]
Buzmakov, A. [2 ]
Krakovich, V. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res Univ Higher Sch Econ, St Petersburg Sch Econ & Management, St Petersburg, Russia
[2] Natl Res Univ Higher Sch Econ, Int Lab Intangible Driven Econ, Perm, Russia
[3] Skolkovo Sch Management, Moscow, Russia
关键词
index; ethics; artificial intelligence; NLP; BERT; SENTIMENT ANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1134/S1064562424702338
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Measuring a company's ethics is an important element in the mechanism of regulating the behavior of market participants, as it allows consumers and regulators to make better decisions, which has a disciplining effect on companies. We tested various methods for machine analysis of feedback from Russian bank consumers and developed an ethics index that allows us to calculate a quantitative assessment of the ethics of three hundred Russian banks based on consumer feedback for different time periods from 2005 to 2022. We used a bag-of-words method based on the Moral Foundations Dictionary (MFD) and BERT model training based on a 3000- and 10 000-sentence sample marked up by experts. The resulting index was validated based on the number of arbitration cases from 2005 to 2022 (more ethical companies are involved in fewer arbitration cases as a defendant). As a result, only the BERT model was validated, whereas the MFD-based model was not. The ethics index would be useful as a metric alternative to popular ESG ratings for both theoretical research on company behavior and practical tasks of managing company reputation and forming policies of regulating the behavior of market participants.
引用
收藏
页码:511 / 520
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Grishankova S.D., ESG Ratings: ESG Transformation as a Vector of Sustainable Development in Three Volumes, (2022)
  • [2] La Torre M., Cardi M., Leo S., Schettini Gherardini J., Contemporary Issues in Sustainable Finance, (2023)
  • [3] Ignatova O.V., ESG ratings of Russian businesses,, RISK: Resursy, Inf., Snavzhenie, Konkurentsiyz, No, (2022)
  • [4] Petrov V.O., Starikov I.V., Furshchik M.A., Features of domestic ESG ratings, Budzhet, 4, (2022)
  • [5] Kazakov A., Denisova S., Barsola I., Kalugina E., Molchanova I., Egorov I., Kosterina A., ESGify: Automated classification of environmental, social, and governance risks, Dokl. Math, 108, pp. S529-S345, (2023)
  • [6] Brown T.J., Dacin P.A., The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses, J. Mark, 61, pp. 68-84, (1997)
  • [7] Folkes V.S., Kamins M.A., Effects of information about firms’ ethical and unethical actions on consumers’ attitudes, J. Consum. Psychol, 8, pp. 243-259, (1999)
  • [8] Sen S., Bhattacharya C.B., Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility, J. Mark. Res, 38, pp. 225-243, (2001)
  • [9] Brunk K.H., Exploring origins of ethical company/brand perceptions—A consumer perspective of corporate ethics, J. Bus. Res, 63, pp. 255-262, (2010)
  • [10] Khan I., Fatma M., Understanding the influence of CPE on brand image and brand commitment: The mediating role of brand identification, Sustainability, 15, (2023)