From inequalities to solutions: an explanatory sequential study on type 2 diabetes health services utilization

被引:0
|
作者
Torabipour, Amin [1 ]
Karimi, Saeed [2 ]
Amini-Rarani, Mostafa [3 ]
Gharacheh, Laleh [1 ]
机构
[1] Ahvaz Jundishapur Univ Med Sci, Social Determinants Hlth Res Ctr, Ahvaz, Iran
[2] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Hlth Management & Econ Res Ctr, Esfahan, Iran
[3] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Social Determinants Hlth Res Ctr, Esfahan, Iran
关键词
Inequality; Socioeconomic status; Utilization; Diabetes mellitus; Concentration index; Decomposition qualitative approach; SOCIOECONOMIC INEQUALITIES; RACIAL/ETHNIC DISPARITIES; CARE SERVICES; POPULATION; PREVALENCE; MELLITUS; MORTALITY; CANADA; ADULTS; ASSOCIATION;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-025-12222-w
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundHealth inequities are a significant issue. This study aimed to measure and decompose socioeconomic inequality in the utilization of type 2 diabetes (T2D) services and propose solutions to mitigate these inequalities. MethodsThis explanatory sequential mixed-method study was conducted in two phases: quantitative and qualitative. A total of 2000 T2D patients from health centers, hospitals, and diabetes clinics in Isfahan and Khuzestan provinces, Iran, were selected. In the quantitative phase, the existence of inequality in the utilization of T2D services was examined using the Concentration Index (CI) approach. To determine the contribution of each explanatory variable to T2D inequality, we used concentration index decomposition analysis. In the qualitative phase, based on the main contributors identified in the quantitative phase, we conducted semi-structured interviews with purposefully selected key experts to identify solutions for reducing inequality in the utilization of T2D services. ResultsThe sample consisted of 65.3% men, with 40% of T2D patients being over 60 years old. The CI values were 0.31 (p < 0.05) for outpatient services, -0.10 (p > 0.05) for inpatient services, and 0.11 (p < 0.05) for pharmaceutical services. This indicates an inequality in the utilization of outpatient and pharmaceutical services among T2D patients, while the inequality in inpatient services was not significant. The main variables contributing to inequality in outpatient services were health status (33.54%), basic insurance (27.43%), and socioeconomic status (24.08%). For pharmaceutical services, the contributing variables were health status (22.20%), basic insurance (13.63%), and socioeconomic status (34.35%). Experts' solutions to reduce socioeconomic inequalities in Iran were classified into three main themes: socioeconomic status, health status, and basic insurance, with 29 sub-themes. ConclusionThe results suggest that targeted health interventions for poor T2D patients are recommended. Efforts towards universal coverage in outpatient care and commonly used pharmaceutical items, such as: Antidiabetic Drugs, Triglyceride Control Drugs, Cardiovascular Drugs, Neuropathy Drugs, and Nephropathy Drugs, should be considered.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Socioeconomic Status, Modifiable Factors, and Risk of Microvascular Complications in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes: A Cohort Study From the UK Biobank
    Li, Ying
    You, Qiqi
    Fan, Menglin
    Wei, Lingqi
    Zeng, Jingjing
    Chen, Bo
    Wang, Jie
    Xu, Shaoyong
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES, 2025, 17 (04)
  • [32] Income-related inequalities in visual impairment and eye screening services in patients with type 2 diabetes
    Hwang, Jongnam
    Rudnisky, Christopher
    Bowen, Sarah
    Johnson, Jeffrey A.
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 38 (04) : E571 - E579
  • [33] Health promotion interventions in type 2 diabetes
    Sorensen, Monica
    Korsmo-Haugen, Henny-Kristine
    Maggini, Marina
    Kuske, Silke
    Icks, Andrea
    Rothe, Ulrike
    Lindstrom, Jaana
    Zaletel, Jelka
    ANNALI DELL ISTITUTO SUPERIORE DI SANITA, 2015, 51 (03): : 192 - 198
  • [34] Socioeconomic inequalities in health-related functioning among people with type 2 Diabetes: longitudinal analyses in the Maastricht Study
    Meisters, Rachelle
    Albers, Jeroen
    Sezer, Bengisu
    de Galan, Bastiaan E.
    Eussen, Simone J. P. M.
    Stehouwer, Coen D. A.
    Schram, Miranda T.
    van Greevenbroek, Marleen M. J.
    Wesselius, Anke
    Koster, Annemarie
    Bosma, Hans
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [35] Impairment of executive cognitive control in type 2 diabetes, and its effects on health-related behavior and use of health services
    Dinh Tran
    Baxter, Judith
    Hamman, Richard F.
    Grigsby, Jim
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2014, 37 (03) : 414 - 422
  • [36] Examining Diabetes Distress in Pre-existing Diabetes in Pregnancy: Protocol for an Explanatory Sequential Mixed Methods Study
    Tschirhart, Holly
    Yost, Jennifer
    Landeen, Janet
    Nerenberg, Kara A.
    Sherifali, Diana
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2023, 22
  • [37] SOCIAL CLASS INEQUALITIES IN THE UTILIZATION OF HEALTH CARE AND PREVENTIVE SERVICES IN SPAIN, A COUNTRY WITH A NATIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM
    Garrido-Cumbrera, Marco
    Borrell, Carme
    Palencia, Laia
    Espelt, Albert
    Rodriguez-Sanz, Maica
    Pasarin, M. Isabel
    Kunst, Anton
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES, 2010, 40 (03): : 525 - 542
  • [38] What limits the utilization of health services among china labor force? analysis of inequalities in demographic, socio-economic and health status
    Lu, Liming
    Zeng, Jingchun
    Zeng, Zhi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2017, 16 : 1 - 7
  • [39] Health Status and Health-Related Behaviors Among Type 2 Diabetes Community Residents
    Chen, Mei-Yen
    Huang, Wei-Chao
    Peng, Yun-Shing
    Jong, Ming-Chung
    Chen, Chu-Yeh
    Lin, Hui-Chuan
    JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 2011, 19 (01) : 35 - 43
  • [40] Arsenic exposure and type 2 diabetes: results from the 2007-2009 Canadian Health Measures Survey
    Feseke, S. K.
    St-Laurent, J.
    Anassour-Sidi, E.
    Ayotte, P.
    Bouchard, M.
    Levallois, P.
    HEALTH PROMOTION AND CHRONIC DISEASE PREVENTION IN CANADA-RESEARCH POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2015, 35 (04): : 63 - 72