Open and minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair for patients with previous prostatectomy: a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Kasakewitch, Joao Pedro Goncalves [1 ]
da Silveira, Carlos A. Balthazar [2 ]
Inaba, Marina Eguchi [3 ]
Nogueira, Raquel [4 ]
Rasador, Ana Caroline Dias [2 ]
Lima, Diego L. [4 ]
Malcher, Flavio [5 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Bahiana Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Dom Joao VI Ave 275, BR-40290000 Brotas, BA, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Surg, 740 Botucatu St, BR-04023062 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[4] Montefiore Med Ctr, Dept Surg, 1825 Eastchester Rd, Bronx, NY 10461 USA
[5] NYU Langone, Div Gen Surg, 550 1st Ave, New York, NY 10016 USA
关键词
Inguinal hernia; Prostatectomy; Minimally invasive surgery; Laparoscopic surgery; Robotic surgery; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; SAFE;
D O I
10.1007/s10029-025-03323-w
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair (IHR) after prostatectomy has been considered a challenging procedure due to the presence of scar tissue and adhesions. We aimed to compare the outcomes of open and MIS IHR outcomes in post-prostatectomy patients through a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis. Material & methods PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science were searched for studies on open and MIS IHR after prostatectomy. Outcomes such as recurrence, complications, seroma, hematoma, SSI, and conversion rates were analyzed, with subgroup analyses conducted for open, TEP, and TAPP procedures. Results Among 402 screened studies, 18 met the inclusion criteria, covering 8,668 open IHR (64.6%) and 4,761 MIS IHR (35.4%) patients. The rate per 100 events for intraoperative complications was 0.19 (95% CI [0.00; 0.76]; I2 = 71%;), 5.22 per 100 for seroma (95% CI [2.86; 9.34]; I2 = 92%), 0.83 per 100 for SSI (95% CI [0.39; 1.75]; I2 = 48%), 3.16 per 100 for hematoma (95% CI [1.16; 8.31]; I2 = 84%), 3.02 per 100 patients for chronic pain (95% CI [2.53; 3.62]; I2 = 13%), and 0.02 per 100 for recurrence (95% CI [0; 0.16]; I2 = 10%). The conversion rate for MIS was 1.66 per 100 (95% CI [0.89; 3.06]; I2 = 0%). Subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference between TEP and TAPP in intraoperative complications (p = 0.70), but a lower seroma rate in TAPP compared to TEP (5.29 vs. 20 per 100; P = 0.01). MIS had significant reduction in SSI (0.08 vs. 0.34 per 100; P < 0.01), hematoma (1.29 vs. 17.86; p < 0.01), and recurrence (0.08 vs. 0.37; p = 0.04) compared to open, with no difference in seroma rates. Funnel plots revealed no evidence of publication bias. Conclusions In experienced hands, MIS IHR is a safe and effective option for post-prostatectomy patients, with lower complication rates compared to open IHR, although high-quality comparative studies are needed to establish definitive conclusions.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy—systematic review and meta-analysis
    Michał Pędziwiatr
    Piotr Małczak
    Magdalena Pisarska
    Piotr Major
    Michał Wysocki
    Tomasz Stefura
    Andrzej Budzyński
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2017, 402 : 841 - 851
  • [22] Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Inguinal Hernia Repair at the Time of Robotic Radical Prostatectomy
    Francois G. Soto-Palou
    Ricardo F. Sánchez-Ortiz
    Current Urology Reports, 2017, 18
  • [23] Concurrent Inguinal Hernia Repair in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Radical Prostatectomy: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Study
    Xia, Leilei
    Taylor, Benjamin L.
    Patel, Neal A.
    Chelluri, Raju R.
    Raman, Jay D.
    Scherr, Douglas S.
    Guzzo, Thomas J.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2018, 32 (07) : 665 - 670
  • [24] Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Inguinal Hernia Repair at the Time of Robotic Radical Prostatectomy
    Soto-Palou, Francois G.
    Sanchez-Ortiz, Ricardo F.
    CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2017, 18 (06)
  • [25] Round ligament management during minimally invasive groin hernia repair in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Silveira, C. A. B.
    de Figueiredo, S. Mazzola Poli
    Rasador, A. C. D.
    Fernandez, M. G.
    Martin, R. R. H.
    Dias, Y. J. M.
    Lu, R.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2024, 38 (04): : 1723 - 1730
  • [26] Round ligament management during minimally invasive groin hernia repair in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    C. A. B. Silveira
    S. Mazzola Poli de Figueiredo
    A. C. D. Rasador
    M. G. Fernandez
    R. R. H. Martin
    Y. J. M. Dias
    R. Lu
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2024, 38 : 1731 - 1739
  • [27] Optimal timing for inguinal hernia repair in premature infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Masoudian, Pourya
    Sullivan, Katrina J.
    Mohamed, Hisham
    Nasr, Ahmed
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2019, 54 (08) : 1539 - 1545
  • [28] Robotic inguinal hernia repair: is technology taking over? Systematic review and meta-analysis
    A. Aiolfi
    M. Cavalli
    G. Micheletto
    P. G. Bruni
    F. Lombardo
    C. Perali
    G. Bonitta
    D. Bona
    Hernia, 2019, 23 : 509 - 519
  • [29] Laparoscopic Extraperitoneal Hernia Repair Versus Open Repair in Boys with Inguinal Hernia: A Meta-Analysis
    Cheng, Po -Lung
    Duh, Yih-Cherng
    Chen, Jeng-Jung
    Huang, Fu-Huan
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2023, 58 (07) : 1322 - 1331
  • [30] Open darn repair vs open mesh repair of inguinal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised studies
    Finch, D. A.
    Misra, V. A.
    Hajibandeh, S.
    HERNIA, 2019, 23 (03) : 523 - 539