Importance of the second D-T campaign at JET for future fusion tokamak devices

被引:0
|
作者
Garcia, J. [1 ]
JET Contributors [1 ]
机构
[1] CEA, IRFM, F-13108 St Paul Les Durance, France
来源
REVIEWS OF MODERN PLASMA PHYSICS | 2025年 / 9卷 / 01期
关键词
Deuterium-Tritium; Alpha particles; Tokamak; Toroidal Plasma; JET; DTE2; TRITIUM; CONFINEMENT; PLASMAS; TRANSPORT; WAVES; IONS;
D O I
10.1007/s41614-025-00182-x
中图分类号
O35 [流体力学]; O53 [等离子体物理学];
学科分类号
070204 ; 080103 ; 080704 ;
摘要
In 2021, JET conducted a second deuterium-tritium campaign (DTE2) aimed at broadening, refreshing, and improving the understanding of deuterium-tritium plasmas that was initially acquired during the first deuterium-tritium campaign (DTE1) in 1997. The objective of DTE2 was to tackle crucial scientific, operational, engineering, and theoretical/modeling challenges associated with the utilization of deuterium-tritium plasmas for fusion energy production. DTE2 has yielded vital findings that enhance the understanding and blueprint of forthcoming tokamak devices like ITER or DEMO. In DTE2, it has been unambiguously demonstrated the impact of alpha particles generated by fusion deuterium-tritium reactions on electron heating and destabilization of Alfv & eacute;n modes, as well as the impact of Tritium on several scientific topics such as plasma turbulence and transport, L-H transition and impurity source. Of utmost importance, an entire generation of scientists has been educated on the substantial disparities in the physics and operational aspects of Deuterium and deuterium-tritium plasmas. This recent deuterium-tritium campaign at JET brings us closer to the efficient production of energy through deuterium-tritium fusion reactions.
引用
收藏
页数:50
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] D-T experiments in the JET Tokamak
    Keilhacker, M
    Watkins, ML
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS, 1999, 266 : 1 - 13
  • [2] The Scientific Case for a JET D-T Experiment
    Weisen, H.
    Sips, A. C. C.
    Challis, C. D.
    Eriksson, L. -G.
    Sharapov, S. E.
    Batistoni, P.
    Horton, L. D.
    Zastrow, K. -D.
    FUSION REACTOR DIAGNOSTICS, 2014, 1612 : 77 - 86
  • [3] JET D-T scenario with optimized non-thermal fusion
    Maslov, M.
    Lerche, E.
    Auriemma, F.
    Belli, E.
    Bourdelle, C.
    Challis, C. D.
    Chomiczewska, A.
    Dal Molin, A.
    Eriksson, J.
    Garcia, J.
    Hobirk, J.
    Ivanova-Stanik, I.
    Jacquet, Ph.
    Kappatou, A.
    Kazakov, Y.
    Keeling, D. L.
    King, D. B.
    Kiptily, V.
    Kirov, K.
    Kos, D.
    Lorenzini, R.
    de la Luna, E.
    Maggi, C. F.
    Mailloux, J.
    Mantica, P.
    Marin, M.
    Matthews, G.
    Monakhov, I.
    Nocente, M.
    Pucella, G.
    Rigamonti, D.
    Rimini, F.
    Saarelma, S.
    Salewski, M.
    Solano, E. R.
    Stancar, Z.
    Stankunas, G.
    Sun, H.
    Tardocchi, M.
    Van Eester, D.
    NUCLEAR FUSION, 2023, 63 (11)
  • [4] Overview of T and D-T results in JET with ITER-like wall
    Maggi, C. F.
    Abate, D.
    Abid, N.
    Abreu, P.
    Adabonyan, O.
    Afzal, M.
    Ahmad, I.
    Akhtar, M.
    Albanese, R.
    Aleiferis, S.
    Alessi, E.
    Aleynikov, P.
    Aleynikov, P.
    Alguacil, J.
    Alhage, J.
    Ali, M.
    Allen, H.
    Allinson, M.
    Alonzo, M.
    Alves, E.
    Ambrosino, R.
    Sunden, E. Andersson
    Andrew, P.
    Angelone, M.
    Angioni, C.
    Antoniou, I.
    Appel, L.
    Appelbee, C.
    Aramunde, C.
    Ariola, M.
    Arnoux, G.
    Artaserse, G.
    Artaud, J. -F.
    Arter, W.
    Artigues, V.
    Artola, F. J.
    Ash, A.
    Asztalos, O.
    Auld, D.
    Auriemma, F.
    Austin, Y.
    Avotina, L.
    Ayllon, J.
    Aymerich, E.
    Baciero, A.
    Bahner, L.
    Bairaktaris, F.
    Balboa, I.
    Balden, M.
    Balshaw, N.
    NUCLEAR FUSION, 2024, 64 (11)
  • [5] Fusion power predictions for β N ≈ 1.8 baseline scenario with 50-50 D-T fuel mix and NBI injection in preparation to D-T operations at JET
    Zotta, V. K.
    Garzotti, L.
    Casson, F. J.
    Frigione, D.
    Kochl, F.
    Lerche, E.
    Lomas, P.
    Rimini, F.
    Sertoli, M.
    Van Eester, D.
    Gatto, R.
    Mazzotta, C.
    Pucella, G.
    NUCLEAR FUSION, 2022, 62 (07)
  • [6] A Numerical Simulation for Fusion Reaction in Tokamak D-T Plasma
    Zeng, Bo
    Zhao, Zijia
    Chen, Zhong
    Pan, Dongmei
    Lv, Zhongliang
    Ma, Yanyun
    FUSION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 77 (02) : 88 - 97
  • [7] Validation of D-T fusion power prediction capability against 2021 JET D-T experiments
    Kim, Hyun-Tae
    Auriemma, Fulvio
    Ferreira, Jorge
    Gabriellini, Stefano
    Ho, Aaron
    Huynh, Philippe
    Kirov, Krassimir
    Lorenzini, Rita
    Marin, Michele
    Poradzinski, Michal
    Shi, Nan
    Staebler, Gary
    Stancar, Ziga
    Stankunas, Gediminas
    Konrad Zotta, Vito
    Belli, Emily
    Casson, Francis J.
    Challis, Clive
    Citrin, Jonathan
    van Eester, Dirk
    Fransson, Emil
    Gallart, Daniel
    Garcia, Jeronimo
    Garzotti, Luca
    Gatto, Renato
    Hobirk, Joerg
    Kappatou, Athina
    Lerche, Ernesto
    Ludvig-Osipov, Andrei
    Maggi, Costanza
    Maslov, Mikhail
    Nocente, Massimo
    Sharma, Ridhima
    Di Siena, Alessandro
    Strand, Par
    Tholerus, Emmi
    Yadykin, Dimitriy
    NUCLEAR FUSION, 2023, 63 (11)
  • [8] Numerical Model of Tokamak D-D/D-T Fusion Neutron Source
    Xu K.
    Ye M.-Y.
    Song Y.-T.
    Lei M.-Z.
    Mao S.-F.
    Liu X.-F.
    2017, Atomic Energy Press (51): : 1345 - 1350
  • [9] Semi-empirical extrapolation of JET baseline and hybrid scenario fusion performance to D-T operation
    Weisen, H.
    Siren, P.
    Varje, J.
    Kilpelainen, J.
    NUCLEAR FUSION, 2021, 61 (12)
  • [10] The safety case for JET D-T operation
    Bell, AC
    Ballantyne, P
    Gordont, C
    Wright, MA
    FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 1999, 47 (2-3) : 115 - 130