首页
学术期刊
论文检测
AIGC检测
热点
更多
数据
Improving ethical sensitivity for ethical decision-making in conversational artificial intelligence
被引:0
作者
:
Kyungsun Yoo
论文数:
0
引用数:
0
h-index:
0
机构:
Department of Computer Education, Sungkyunkwan University, Hoam Hall, 25-2, Sungkyunkwan-Ro, Jongno-Gu, Seoul
Department of Computer Education, Sungkyunkwan University, Hoam Hall, 25-2, Sungkyunkwan-Ro, Jongno-Gu, Seoul
Kyungsun Yoo
[
1
]
Seongjin Ahn
论文数:
0
引用数:
0
h-index:
0
机构:
Department of Computer Education, Sungkyunkwan University, Hoam Hall, 25-2, Sungkyunkwan-Ro, Jongno-Gu, Seoul
Department of Computer Education, Sungkyunkwan University, Hoam Hall, 25-2, Sungkyunkwan-Ro, Jongno-Gu, Seoul
Seongjin Ahn
[
1
]
机构
:
[1]
Department of Computer Education, Sungkyunkwan University, Hoam Hall, 25-2, Sungkyunkwan-Ro, Jongno-Gu, Seoul
来源
:
Discover Computing
|
/ 28卷
/ 1期
关键词
:
Conversational artificial intelligence;
Ethical judgment;
Ethical sensitivity;
Ethics of artificial intelligence;
Large language model;
D O I
:
10.1007/s10791-025-09520-6
中图分类号
:
学科分类号
:
摘要
:
The development of large language models has significantly advanced the reasoning capabilities of artificial intelligence (AI), often surpassing human-level performance. As AI's cognitive abilities rapidly progress, ethical concerns surrounding its applications have also increased. This indicates a heightened risk of bias, as AI models scale up and train on vast amounts of general data that inherently include social conventions related to gender, race, politics, and religion. This study proposes methods for enhancing ethical sensitivity to social bias. To achieve this, we defined 20 categories of social bias and developed a model that predicts the ethical sensitivity of sentences by leveraging the influence scores of words within these categories. The ethical sensitivity prediction model was validated using a paired-sample t-test to compare the ethical sensitivity evaluations of 25 AI-generated responses assessed by both AI and human evaluators. The test revealed no significant differences between the two groups, thus confirming the validity of the model. The findings of this study suggest that recognizing and predicting the ethical sensitivity of utterances concerning social biases can enhance ethical sensitivity, mitigate the risk of bias, and contribute to more ethical decision-making in AI interactions. © The Author(s) 2025.
引用
收藏
相关论文
未找到相关数据
未找到相关数据