Evolution from laparoscopic to robotic radical resection for gallbladder cancer: a propensity score-matched comparative study

被引:0
作者
Dou, Changwei [1 ]
He, Mu [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Qingqing [1 ,2 ]
Tong, Jun [1 ,2 ]
Fan, Bingfu [1 ]
Liu, Junwei [1 ]
Jin, Liming [1 ]
Liu, Jie [1 ]
Zhang, Chengwu [1 ]
机构
[1] Hangzhou Med Coll, Gen Surg, Canc Ctr, Dept Hepatobiliary & Pancreat Surg & Minimally Inv, 158 Shangtang Rd, Hangzhou 310014, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Hangzhou Normal Univ, Grad Sch, Hangzhou 310014, Peoples R China
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2025年 / 39卷 / 01期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Gallbladder cancer; Robotic radical resection; Laparoscopic radical resection; Propensity score analysis; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; LYMPHADENECTOMY;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-024-11371-z
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThe use of robotic or laparoscopic surgery for gallbladder cancer (GBC) is increasing, with reported advantages over conventional open surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes and postoperative overall survival (OS) associated with robotic radical resection (RRR) and laparoscopic radical resection (LRR) for GBC.MethodA total of 109 patients with GBC who underwent radical resection with the same surgical team between January 2015 and December 2023 were enrolled, with 21 patients in the RRR group and 88 cases in the LRR group. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) algorithm was used to compare the surgical outcomes and postoperative prognosis between the RRR and LRR groups. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors of postoperative overall survival (OS) and complications of Clavien-Dindo (C-D) Grades III-IV.ResultsThe median follow-up time was 46 (inter-quartile range, IQR 29-70) months for the LRR group and 16 (IQR 12-34) months for the RRR group. After PSM, the baseline characteristics of the RRR and LRR groups were generally well balanced, with 21 patients in each group. RRR was associated with significantly decreased intraoperative bleeding [100.00 (50.00, 200.00) mL vs 200.00 (100.00, 300.00) mL] and higher number of lymph nodes (LNs) yield [12.00 (9.00, 15.50) vs 8.00 (6.00, 12.00)]. The two groups showed comparable outcomes in terms of the incidence of biliary reconstruction, the range of liver resection, the length of operation, the incidence of postoperative morbidity, the incidence of C-D Grades III-IV complications, number of the days of drainage tubes indwelling and postoperative hospital stay, and mortality by postoperative days 30 and 90. After PSM, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival rates were 78, 70, and 37%, respectively, in the RRR group, and 71, 59, and 48%, respectively, in the LRR group (P = 0.593). Multivariate analysis showed that the preoperative TB level >= 72 mu mol/L and biliary reconstruction were found to be the independent risk factors of C-D Grades III-IV complications. T3 stage was identified to be the risk factor for postoperative OS.ConclusionCompared with LRR, RRR showed comparable perioperative outcomes in terms of length of operation, and postoperative complications, recovery, and OS. In our case series, RRR of GBC can be accomplished safely and tends to show less intraoperative bleeding and higher LNs yield.
引用
收藏
页码:290 / 299
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Minimally invasive versus the conventional open surgical approach of a radical cholecystectomy for gallbladder cancer: a retrospective comparative study
    Agarwal, Anil K.
    Javed, Amit
    Kalayarasan, Raja
    Sakhuja, Puja
    [J]. HPB, 2015, 17 (06) : 536 - 541
  • [2] Gallbladder Cancer: expert consensus statement
    Aloia, Thomas A.
    Jarufe, Nicolas
    Javle, Milind
    Maithel, Shishir K.
    Roa, Juan C.
    Adsay, Volkan
    Coimbra, Felipe J. F.
    Jarnagin, William R.
    [J]. HPB, 2015, 17 (08) : 681 - 690
  • [3] Robotic Surgery as an Alternative Approach for Reoperation of Incidental Gallbladder Cancer
    Araujo, Raphael L. C.
    de Sanctis, Marco Aurelio
    Coelho, Tomas R. V.
    Felippe, Fernando E. C.
    Burgardt, Diego
    Wohnrath, Durval R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL CANCER, 2020, 51 (01) : 332 - 334
  • [4] Branch of Biliary Surgery Chinese Surgical Society, 2020, Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi, V58, P243, DOI 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20200106-00014
  • [5] Robotic extended cholecystectomy in gallbladder cancer
    Byun, Yoonhyeong
    Choi, Yoo Jin
    Kang, Jae Seung
    Han, Youngmin
    Kim, Hongbeom
    Kwon, Wooil
    Jang, Jin-Young
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (07): : 3256 - 3261
  • [6] Comparison of Outcomes After Primary Laparoscopic Versus Open Approach for T1b/T2 Gallbladder Cancer
    Cao, Jiasheng
    Wang, Yong
    Zhang, Bin
    Hu, Jiahao
    Topatana, Win
    Li, Shijie
    Juengpanich, Sarun
    Lu, Ziyi
    Cai, Xiujun
    Chen, Mingyu
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [7] Standardized lymph node dissection for gallbladder cancer under laparoscopy: en-bloc resection technique
    Cheng, Jian
    Liu, Jie
    Dou, Chang-Wei
    Xie, Zhong-Chun
    Fan, Bing-Fu
    Jin, Li-Ming
    Liang, Lei
    Zhang, Cheng-Wu
    [J]. LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2023, 408 (01)
  • [8] Oncologic safety of robotic extended cholecystectomy for gallbladder cancer
    Cho, Young Jae
    Yun, Won-Gun
    Jung, Hye-Sol
    Lee, Mirang
    Han, Youngmin
    Kwon, Wooil
    Jang, Jin-Young
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (12): : 9089 - 9097
  • [9] 8th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Pancreas and Hepatobiliary Cancers
    Chun, Yun Shin
    Pawlik, Timothy M.
    Vauthey, Jean-Nicolas
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 (04) : 845 - 847
  • [10] Propensity Score Analysis of Outcomes Following Laparoscopic or Open Radical Resection for Gallbladder Cancer in T2 and T3 Stages
    Dou, Changwei
    Zhang, Chunxu
    Zhang, Chengwu
    Liu, Jie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2022, 26 (07) : 1416 - 1424