Twenty-first century mouse genetics is again at an inflection point

被引:0
作者
Fang, Zhuoqing [1 ]
Peltz, Gary [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesia Pain & Perioperat Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
IN-SILICO; ASSOCIATION; DISCOVERY; VARIANTS; TRAITS; IDENTIFICATION; GENERATION; PROSPECTS; ALLELES; GENES;
D O I
10.1038/s41684-024-01491-3
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The laboratory mouse has been the premier model organism for biomedical research owing to the availability of multiple well-characterized inbred strains, its mammalian physiology and its homozygous genome, and because experiments can be performed under conditions that control environmental variables. Moreover, its genome can be genetically modified to assess the impact of allelic variation on phenotype. Mouse models have been used to discover or test many therapies that are commonly used today. Mouse genetic discoveries are often made using genome-wide association study methods that compare allelic differences in panels of inbred mouse strains with their phenotypic responses. Here we examine changes in the methods used to analyze mouse genetic models of biomedical traits during the twenty-first century. To do this, we first examine where mouse genetics was before the first inflection point, which was just before the revolution in genome sequencing that occurred 20 years ago, and then describe the factors that have accelerated the pace of mouse genetic discovery. We focus on mouse genetic studies that have generated findings that either were translated to humans or could impact clinical medicine or drug development. We next explore how advances in computational capabilities and in DNA sequencing methodology during the past 20 years could enhance the ability of mouse genetics to produce solutions for twenty-first century public-health problems. Mouse genetic studies are essential for our understanding of genotype-phenotype relationships. Here the authors discuss the technological advances that have accelerated the pace of mouse genetic discovery during the twenty-first century.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 15
页数:7
相关论文
共 93 条
  • [1] Mapping novel QTL and fine mapping of previously identified QTL associated with glucose tolerance using the collaborative cross mice
    Abu-Toamih-Atamni, Hanifa J.
    Lone, Iqbal M.
    Binenbaum, Ilona
    Mott, Richard
    Pilalis, Eleftherios
    Chatziioannou, Aristotelis
    Iraqi, Fuad A.
    [J]. MAMMALIAN GENOME, 2024, 35 (01) : 31 - 55
  • [2] Determinants of enhancer and promoter activities of regulatory elements
    Andersson, Robin
    Sandelin, Albin
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2020, 21 (02) : 71 - 87
  • [3] Analysis of structural variation among inbred mouse strains
    Arslan, Ahmed
    Fang, Zhuoqing
    Wang, Meiyue
    Tan, Yalun
    Cheng, Zhuanfen
    Chen, Xinyu
    Guan, Yuan
    J. Pisani, Laura
    Yoo, Boyoung
    Bejerano, Gill
    Peltz, Gary
    [J]. BMC GENOMICS, 2023, 24 (01)
  • [4] The Collaborative Cross mouse model for dissecting genetic susceptibility to infectious diseases
    Atamni, Hanifa Abu Toamih
    Nashef, Aysar
    Iraqi, Fuad A.
    [J]. MAMMALIAN GENOME, 2018, 29 (7-8) : 471 - 487
  • [5] Extreme phenotypic diversity in operant response to intravenous cocaine or saline infusion in the hybrid mouse diversity panel
    Bagley, Jared R.
    Khan, Arshad H.
    Smith, Desmond J.
    Jentsch, James D.
    [J]. ADDICTION BIOLOGY, 2022, 27 (03)
  • [6] Genealogies of mouse inbred strains
    Beck, JA
    Lloyd, S
    Hafezparast, M
    Lennon-Pierce, M
    Eppig, JT
    Festing, MFW
    Fisher, EMC
    [J]. NATURE GENETICS, 2000, 24 (01) : 23 - +
  • [7] CHROMOSOME MAPPING OF GENE LOCI AFFECTING MORPHINE AND AMPHETAMINE RESPONSES IN BXD RECOMBINANT INBRED MICE
    BELKNAP, JK
    CRABBE, JC
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 1992, 654 : 311 - 323
  • [8] A high-resolution association mapping panel for the dissection of complex traits in mice
    Bennett, Brian J.
    Farber, Charles R.
    Orozco, Luz
    Kang, Hyun Min
    Ghazalpour, Anatole
    Siemers, Nathan
    Neubauer, Michael
    Neuhaus, Isaac
    Yordanova, Roumyana
    Guan, Bo
    Truong, Amy
    Yang, Wen-pin
    He, Aiqing
    Kayne, Paul
    Gargalovic, Peter
    Kirchgessner, Todd
    Pan, Calvin
    Castellani, Lawrence W.
    Kostem, Emrah
    Furlotte, Nicholas
    Drake, Thomas A.
    Eskin, Eleazar
    Lusis, Aldons J.
    [J]. GENOME RESEARCH, 2010, 20 (02) : 281 - 290
  • [9] Predicting cancer outcomes with radiomics and artificial intelligence in radiology
    Bera, Kaustav
    Braman, Nathaniel
    Gupta, Amit
    Velcheti, Vamsidhar
    Madabhushi, Anant
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 19 (02) : 132 - 146
  • [10] Birgmeier J., 2021, PREPRINT, DOI [10.1101/2020.12.29.20248974, DOI 10.1101/2020.12.29.20248974]