Meta-analysis of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus oblique lumbar interbody fusion for treating lumbar degenerative diseases

被引：0
作者：
Dun Liu [1 ]
Xinyu Huang [1 ]
Chongyang Zhang [2 ]
Qin Wang [3 ]
Hua Jiang [1 ]
机构：
[1] Department of Spine Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, 6 Shuangyong Road, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning
[2] Tianyou Hospital Affiliated to Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Hubei, Wuhan
[3] Huzhou Center Hospital, Zhejiang Province, Huzhou
来源：
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research | / 19卷 / 1期
关键词：
Lumbar degenerative disease; Meta-analysis; Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; Oblique lumbar interbody fusion;
D O I：
10.1186/s13018-024-05422-3
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Objective: This study aims to perform a meta-analysis that integrates multiple literature sources to evaluate the clinical efficacy of oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for treating lumbar degenerative diseases (LDD). Methods: A systematic search was conducted across various databases, including CNKI, VIP, WANFANG DATA, SinoMed, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science, for clinical comparative studies on OLIF and MIS-TLIF for treating LDD, covering the time frame from the inception of the databases to September 2024. Following PRISMA guidelines, studies were screened, assessed, and data were extracted rigorously. Indicators extracted included operative time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), disc height (DH), segmental lordotic angle (SLA), lumbar lordosis angle (LLA), postoperative JOA scores, patient satisfaction, complication rates, and fusion rates. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4 software. Results: A total of 24 studies were included, comprising 11 randomized controlled trials and 13 retrospective cohort studies. The total population consisted of 1785 patients, with 898 in the OLIF group and 887 in the MIS-TLIF group. The meta-analysis indicated that, compared to the MIS-TLIF group, the OLIF group exhibited significantly lower intraoperative blood loss, shorter hospital stays, improved postoperative DH, shorter operative time, reduced postoperative VAS scores, lower postoperative ODI scores, and improved postoperative SLA and LLA. No significant differences were observed between the groups in postoperative JOA scores, fusion rates, complication rates, or patient satisfaction. The OLIF group exhibited advantages such as lower blood loss, shorter hospital stays, higher postoperative fusion rates, and improved recovery of disc and foraminal heights. Conclusion: Compared to MIS-TLIF, OLIF is associated with a shorter operative time and less intraoperative blood loss, potentially leading to better relief of leg pain, restoration of DH, and prevention of subsidence. These findings offer valuable insights for clinical practice. © The Author(s) 2024.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Khechen B., Haws B.F., Patel D.V., Narain A.S., Hijji F.Y., Guntin J.A., Cardinal K.L., Et al., Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes between Primary MIS TLIF and MIS TLIF with Revision Decompression, pp. 1528-1159
  • [2] Ge D.H., Stekas N.F., Varlotta C.G., Fischer C.R., Petrizzo A., Protopsaltis T.S., Passias P.G., Et al., Comparative Analysis of Two Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Techniques: Open TLIF versus Wiltse MIS TLIF, pp. 1528-1159
  • [3] Reid P., Morr S., Kaiser M.G., State of the Union: A Review of Lumbar Fusion Indications and Techniques for Degenerative Spine Disease, pp. 1547-5646
  • [4] Foley K.T., Lefkowitz M.A., Advances in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, pp. 0069-4827
  • [5] Silvestre C., Mac-Thiong J., Hilmi R., Roussouly P., Complications and Morbidities of Mini-Open Anterior Retroperitoneal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in 179 Patients, pp. 1976-7846
  • [6] Mobbs R.J., Phan K., Malham G., Seex K., Rao P.J., Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF, J Spine Surg, 1, 1, pp. 2-18, (2015)
  • [7] Chen L.L., Analysis of Clinical Efficacy of OLIF, MIS-TLIF, and Open-Tlif in the Treatment of Degenerative Diseases of a Single Lumbar Segment, (2023)
  • [8] Lin J., Hong Y., Chen Z., Lu S., Clinical efficacy of lateral extraforaminal interbody fusion surgery vs. minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion surgery for degenerative lumbar scoliosis with lumbar stenosis, Chin J Med Guid, 20, 21, pp. 97-100, (2023)
  • [9] Liu S., Comparison of the efficacy of lateral extraforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery vs. minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery in the treatment of patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis, Chin J Minkang Med, 35, 18, pp. 152-155, (2023)
  • [10] Lu F., Tang M., Guo J., Lateral extraforaminal interbody fusion with internal fixation for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis, J Neck Low Back Pain, 42, 3, pp. 326-329, (2021)
1234