The lived experience of co-production: Reflective accounts from the InCLUDE project

被引:1
作者
Shayma Izzidien [1 ]
Rachael Stemp [2 ]
Sakab Akram [2 ]
Sabbir Ahmed [2 ]
Alay Rangel-Cristales [1 ]
Karen Irvine [2 ]
Shivani Sharma [3 ]
Nick Midgley [4 ]
机构
[1] Anna Freud, London
[2] School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield
[3] College of Business and Social Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham
[4] Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, UCL, London
关键词
Children’s social care; Co-production; Diaries; Ethnicity; Foster care; Kinship care; Participatory research; Patient and public involvement; Reflection; Underserved;
D O I
10.1186/s40900-024-00639-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The value of co-produced research in health and social care is increasingly recognised, but accounts into the processes and individual experiences of co-producing research are lacking. This paper describes the personal journeys of four researchers (two experts by foster caring experience and two experts by profession) throughout the life course of a co-produced research project exploring the barriers and facilitators to inclusive research in foster caring, the InCLUDE project. Methods: Each researcher kept a diary throughout the InCLUDE project of their personal reflections, questions, and learning. These were synthesised and reviewed by the researchers and two colleagues external to the team, and key themes were extracted. Results: Narratives constructed from the diaries are presented in relation to distinct aspects of the co-production journey, alongside illustrative quotes. These aspects include: motivations for starting the project; making sense of the project; defining roles and responsibilities; challenges; and reflections on acquired knowledge and skills. From these insights, the researchers present recommendations for others endeavouring to engage in co-produced research. These include: recognising vulnerabilities and challenges during the early stages of a project; creating safe spaces; seeing the value of diversity; harnessing individual strengths; establishing a strong routine; and ensuring equal voice. Conclusions: This paper presents a novel perspective on the realities of co-produced research by documenting the lived experiences of researchers within the context of foster care research. It highlights the importance of both measurable, tangible project outcomes, and the personal and skills growth of team members. The consistent use of diaries is encouraged as a valuable practice to capture learning, progress and achievements throughout the co-production process. © The Author(s) 2024.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Beresford P., Public participation in health and social care: exploring the co-production of knowledge, Front Sociol, 3, (2019)
[2]  
Smith H., Budworth L., Grindey C., Hague I., Hamer N., Kislov R., Van Der Graaf P., Langley J., Co-production practice and future research priorities in United Kingdom-funded applied health research: a scoping review, Health Res Policy Syst, 20, (2022)
[3]  
Slattery P., Saeri A.K., Bragge P., Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews, Health Res Policy Syst, 18, (2020)
[4]  
Allen K., Needham C., Hall K., Tanner D., Participatory research meets validated outcome measures: tensions in the co-production of social care evaluation, Soc Policy Admin, 53, pp. 311-325, (2019)
[5]  
Laidlaw L., Vigurs C., Candy B., Collis A., Kneale D., The value of co-production research project: A rapid critical review of the evidence, Co-Production Collective: London, UK, (2022)
[6]  
Masterson D., Areskoug Josefsson K., Robert G., Nylander E., Kjellstrom S., Mapping definitions of co-production and co-design in health and social care: a systematic scoping review providing lessons for the future, Health Expect, 25, pp. 902-913, (2022)
[7]  
Hickey G., Brearley S., Coldham T., Denegri S., Green G., Staniszewska S., Tembo D., Torok K., Turner K., Guidance on co-producing a research project, Southampton: INVOLVE, (2018)
[8]  
Atkin H., Thomson L., Wood O., Co-production in research: co-researcher perspectives on its value and challenges, Br J Occup Ther, 83, 7, pp. 415-417, (2020)
[9]  
Pettican A., Goodman B., Bryant W., Beresford P., Freeman P., Gladwell V., Kilbride C., Speed E., Doing together: reflections on facilitating the co-production of participatory action research with marginalised populations, Qual Res Sport, Exerc Health, 15, 2, pp. 202-219, (2022)
[10]  
Slay J., Stephens L., Co-production in mental health: a literature review, (2013)