Investigating the Results of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass After Primary Metabolic and Bariatric Restrictive Procedures

被引:0
作者
Shahmiri, Shahab Shahabi [1 ,3 ]
Esparham, Ali [2 ]
Sedaghat, Hossein Khadem [1 ]
Safari, Shiva [4 ]
Daryabari, Seyed Nooredin [4 ,5 ]
Pazouki, Abdolreza [1 ,3 ]
Kermansaravi, Mohammad [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Iran Univ Med Sci, Hazrat E Fatemeh Hosp, Div Minimally Invas & Bariatr Surg, Dept Surg,Minimally Invas Surg Res Ctr,Sch Sci, Tehran, Iran
[2] Mashhad Univ Med Sci, Mashhad, Iran
[3] Hazrat Rasool Hosp, European Branch Int Federat Surg Obes, Ctr Excellence, Tehran, Iran
[4] Iran Univ Med Sci, Minimally Invas Surg Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[5] Iran Univ Med Sci, Firoozgar Univ Affiliated Hosp, Dept Surg, Sch Med,Div Minimally Invas & Bariatr Surg, Tehran, Iran
关键词
One anastomosis gastric bypass; Conversion; Sleeve gastrectomy; Gastric banding; Gastric Plication; Recurrent weight gain; SURGERY; EXPERIENCE; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1007/s11695-024-07628-0
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundPrevious studies showed a high conversion rate and failure of restrictive procedures, including sleeve gastrectomy (SG), adjustable gastric banding (AGB), gastric plication (GP), and vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) in a long-term follow-up. The current study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a revisional one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) for weight loss and treatment of obesity-related problems after primary metabolic and bariatric restrictive procedures.MethodsA retrospective study on prospectively collected data was conducted on a sample of 151 patients who experienced insufficient weight loss or weight regain after primary restrictive surgeries and underwent OAGB as a revisional procedure.ResultsA total of 151 patients with a history of previous restrictive metabolic and bariatric surgery who underwent a revisional OAGB were included in this study. The restrictive procedures consisted of SG (n = 79), AGB (n = 45), GP (n = 15), and VBG (n = 12). Total weight loss percent (%TWL) after the revisional OAGB was 27.03 +/- 9.12, 27.74 +/- 10.05, 24.62 +/- 9.87, and 24.34 +/- 8.05 after 12, 24, 60, and 84 months, respectively. After 24 months of follow-up, TWL was significantly higher in the GP group compared to the AGB group. However, weight loss outcomes were not significantly different after 60 months of follow-up. The revisional OAGB was associated with a significant resolution of obesity-related problems, including type 2 diabetes (55.55%), hypertension (50%), dyslipidemia (77%), and obstructive sleep apnea (100%) after 2 years of follow-up. There was no serious complication after the revisional OAGB in the short- and long-term follow-up.ConclusionOAGB is an efficient and safe option as a conversion surgery after restrictive procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:525 / 534
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Gastric Plication for Treatment of Morbid Obesity: a Single-Center Experience
    Abdelgawad, Mohamed
    Elgeidie, Ahmed
    El Sorogy, Mohamed
    Elrefai, Mohamed
    Hamed, Hosam
    Abou El-Magd, El-Sayed
    [J]. OBESITY SURGERY, 2022, 32 (10) : 3324 - 3331
  • [2] Rate of revisions or conversion after bariatric surgery over 10 years in the state of New York
    Altieri, Maria S.
    Yang, Jie
    Nie, Lizhou
    Blackstone, Robin
    Spaniolas, Konstantinos
    Pryor, Aurora
    [J]. SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2018, 14 (04) : 500 - 507
  • [3] Ten and more years after vertical banded gastroplasty as primary operation for morbid obesity
    Balsiger, BM
    Poggio, JL
    Mai, J
    Kelly, KA
    Sarr, MG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2000, 4 (06) : 598 - 605
  • [4] Standardized Outcomes Reporting in Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery
    Brethauer, Stacy A.
    Kim, Julie
    el Chaar, Maher
    Papasavas, Pavlos
    Eisenberg, Dan
    Rogers, Ann
    Ballem, Naveen
    Kligman, Mark
    Kothari, Shanu
    [J]. OBESITY SURGERY, 2015, 25 (04) : 587 - 606
  • [5] Bariatric surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Buchwald, H
    Avidor, Y
    Braunwald, E
    Jensen, MD
    Pories, W
    Fahrbach, K
    Schoelles, K
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 292 (14): : 1724 - 1737
  • [6] Busetto L, 2014, OBES SURG, V24, P487, DOI 10.1007/s11695-014-1214-1
  • [7] One-anastomosis gastric bypass by laparoscopy:: Results of the first 209 patients
    Carbajo, M
    García-Caballero, M
    Toledano, M
    Osorio, D
    García-Lanza, C
    Carmona, JA
    [J]. OBESITY SURGERY, 2005, 15 (03) : 398 - 404
  • [8] Effect of operative times in bariatric surgery on outcomes: a matched analysis of the MBSAQIP database
    Clapp, Benjamin
    Marrero, Katie
    Corbett, John
    Sharma, Ishna
    Hage, Karl
    Vierkant, Robert A. A.
    McKenzie, Travis
    Davis Jr, Scott S. S.
    Ghanem, Omar M. M.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (06): : 4113 - 4122
  • [9] American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery 2020 estimate of metabolic and bariatric procedures performed in the United States
    Clapp, Benjamin
    Ponce, Jaime
    DeMaria, Eric
    Ghanem, Omar
    Hutter, Matthew
    Kothari, Shanu
    LaMasters, Teresa
    Kurian, Marina
    English, Wayne
    [J]. SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2022, 18 (09) : 1134 - 1140
  • [10] Mini Gastric Bypass-One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (MGB-OAGB)-IFSO Position Statement
    De Luca, Maurizio
    Tie, Tiffany
    Ooi, Geraldine
    Higa, Kelvin
    Himpens, Jacques
    Carbajo, Miguel-A
    Mahawar, Kamal
    Shikora, Scott
    Brown, Wendy A.
    [J]. OBESITY SURGERY, 2018, 28 (05) : 1188 - 1206