Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Cetylpyridinium Chloride Mouthwash and Chlorhexidine Mouthwash in Plaque Reduction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Subhashree Mohapatra [1 ]
Rahul Mohandas [2 ]
Ladusingh Rajpurohit [1 ]
Sujeet Patil [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Public Health Dentistry, Dr. D.Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune
[2] Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Dr. D.Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Maharashtra, Pimpri, Pune
关键词
Cetylpyridinium; Chlorhexidine; Dental Plaque; Mouthwashes;
D O I
10.1007/s40496-024-00393-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose of Review: Data from previous research suggest that chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) mouthwash and Cetylpyridinium Chloride (CPC) mouthwash effectively reduce dental plaque. However, a systematic review comparing the efficacy of both mouthwashes is lacking. This systematic review aimed to assess and compare the available data on the efficacy of CHX and CPC mouthwash in plaque removal. Recent Findings: Two studies showed no significant difference in the plaque reduction of CPC mouthwash and CHX mouthwash. One study showed that CHX mouthwash was more effective in plaque reduction than CPC mouthwash. Whereas, in another study, it was found that CPC mouthwash was more effective in plaque reduction as compared to CHX mouthwash. One study showed that CPC mouthwash alone was effective in plaque reduction. However, the efficacy was lower than the combination of CHX and CPC mouthwash. Summary: Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) mouthwash is considered a “gold-standard” due to its proven effectiveness in disrupting plaque biofilm. However, it has certain adverse effects. Cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) mouthwash has been found to be effective in plaque reduction and prevention of gingivitis. Databases such as PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, Lilacs, Science Direct, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were comprehensively searched. 5 articles were processed for data extraction based on the eligibility criteria out of which 3 articles were further processed for quantitative analysis. The results suggested positive antiplaque efficacy of CPC mouthwash which was comparable to CHX mouthwash. The meta-analysis showed no difference in the plaque reduction between chlorhexidine and CPC mouthwash with a 95% CI of SMD: 0.44 [-1.04, 1.92]; P = 0.56. It was also found that CPC mouthwash was well-tolerated and safe to use with fewer side effects. Based on the results, we concluded that the antiplaque efficacy of CHX mouthwash and CPC mouthwash is comparable. Hence, CPC mouthwash can be an effective alternative to CHX mouthwash with fewer adverse effects. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 9
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The effect of cetylpyridinium chloride mouthrinse as adjunct to toothbrushing compared to placebo on interproximal plaque and gingival inflammation-a systematic review with meta-analyses
    Langa, Gerson Pedro Jose
    Muniz, Francisco Wilker Mustafa Gomes
    Araujo Costa, Ricardo dos Santos
    da Silveira, Taciane Menezes
    Rosing, Cassiano Kuchenbecker
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2021, 25 (02) : 745 - 757
  • [22] Comparative anti-plaque and anti-gingivitis efficiency of Triphala versus chlorhexidine mouthwashes in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Minervini, Giuseppe
    Marrapodi, Maria Maddalena
    Tirupathi, Sunnypriyatham
    Afnan, Lamea
    Di Blasio, Marco
    Cervino, Gabriele
    Isola, Gaetano
    Cicciu, Marco
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2024, 48 (05) : 51 - 59
  • [23] Antimicrobial Efficacy of Propolis in Comparison to Chlorhexidine against Enterococcus faecalis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Almadi, Khalid H.
    Ahmed, Muhammad Adeel
    Ghazal, Tuba
    Jouhar, Rizwan
    Alkahtany, Mazen F.
    Abduljabbar, Tariq
    Vohra, Fahim
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (08):
  • [24] Efficacy of Chlorhexidine after Oral Surgery Procedures on Wound Healing: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Romero-Olid, Maria de Nuria
    Bucataru, Elena
    Ramos-Garcia, Pablo
    Gonzalez-Moles, Miguel Angel
    ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 2023, 12 (10):
  • [25] The Efficacy of Plaque Control by Various Toothbrushing Techniques-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Janakiram, Chandrashekar
    Taha, Farheen
    Joe, Joseph
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2018, 12 (11) : ZE1 - ZE6
  • [26] The impact of scaling and root planning combined with mouthwash during pregnancy on preterm birth and low birth weight: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Salama, May
    Al-Taiar, Abdullah
    McKinney, Denise C.
    Rahman, Estiar
    Merchant, Anwar T.
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [27] Efficacy comparison of chlorhexidine and iodine preparation in reduction of surgical site infection: A systemic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Li
    Wang, Yu
    Wang, Shouyan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2022, 127
  • [28] Chlorhexidine to improve the survival of ART restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Elkady, Dina M.
    Khater, Ahmad G. A.
    Schwendicke, Falk
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2020, 103
  • [29] EFFICACY OF 67% SODIUM BICARBONATE TOOTHPASTE FOR PLAQUE AND GINGIVITIS CONTROL: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Taschieri, Silvio
    Tumedei, Margherita
    Francetti, Luca
    Corbella, Stefano
    Del Fabbro, Massimo
    JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED DENTAL PRACTICE, 2022, 22 (02)
  • [30] Is plaque regrowth inhibited by dentifrice? A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis
    Valkenburg, Cees
    Van der Weijden, Fridus
    Slot, Dagmar Else
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DENTAL HYGIENE, 2019, 17 (01) : 27 - 38