Construction and interpretation of machine learning-based prognostic models for survival prediction among intestinal-type and diffuse-type gastric cancer patients

被引:2
作者
Ji, Kunxiang [1 ]
Shi, Lei [1 ]
Feng, Yan [1 ]
Wang, Linna [1 ]
Guo, HuanNan [1 ]
Li, Hui [1 ]
Xing, Jiacheng [1 ]
Xia, Siyu [1 ]
Xu, Boran [2 ]
Liu, Eryu [2 ]
Zheng, YanDan [3 ]
Li, Chunfeng [4 ]
Liu, Mingyang [1 ]
机构
[1] Beidahuang Ind Grp Gen Hosp, Dept Oncology 4, Harbin, Peoples R China
[2] Beidahuang Ind Grp Gen Hosp, Dept Oncology 3, Harbin, Peoples R China
[3] Anda City Hosp, Dept Oncol, Anda, Peoples R China
[4] Harbin Med Univ, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Canc Hosp, Harbin, Peoples R China
关键词
Gastric cancer; Intestinal-type; Diffuse-type; Prognosis; Machine learning; RISK;
D O I
10.1186/s12957-024-03550-y
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Gastric cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors worldwide, with high incidence and mortality rates, and it has a complex etiology and complex pathological features. Depending on the tumor type, gastric cancer can be classified as intestinal-type and diffuse-type gastric cancer, each with distinct pathogenic mechanisms and clinical presentations. In recent years, machine learning techniques have been widely applied in the medical field, offering new perspectives for the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of gastric cancer patients. Methods This study recruited 2158 gastric cancer patients and constructed prognostic prediction models for both intestinal-type and diffuse-type gastric cancer. Clinical pathological data were collected from patients, and machine learning algorithms were used for feature selection and model construction. The performance of the models was validated with training and testing datasets. The Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) values were used to interpret the model predictions and identify the main factors that influence patient survival. Results In the prognostic model for intestinal-type gastric cancer, the gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) model demonstrated the best performance, with key features including pTNM, CA125, tumor size, CA199, and PALB. Similarly, in the prognostic model for diffuse-type gastric cancer, the GBDT model was utilized, with key features comprising pTNM, Borrmann type IV disease, lymphocyte (LYM), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), potassium (K), perineural invasion (PNI), tumor size, and whole stomach location. Risk stratification analysis revealed that the prognosis of high-risk patients was significantly worse than that of low-risk patients. Conclusion Machine learning shows great potential in predicting survival outcomes of gastric cancer patients, providing strong support for the development of personalized treatment plans.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Machine-Learning-Based Disease Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Review [J].
Ahsan, Md Manjurul ;
Luna, Shahana Akter ;
Siddique, Zahed .
HEALTHCARE, 2022, 10 (03)
[2]   Machine learning-based prediction of postoperative mortality in emergency colorectal surgery: A retrospective, multicenter cohort study using Tokushukai medical database [J].
Akabane, Shota ;
Miyake, Katsunori ;
Iwagami, Masao ;
Tanabe, Kazunari ;
Takagi, Toshio .
HELIYON, 2023, 9 (09)
[3]   Prognostic significance of lactate dehydrogenase and its impact on the outcomes of gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Chen, Jinjin ;
Zou, Xiaoyue .
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
[4]   HER2 classification in breast cancer cells: A new explainable machine learning application for immunohistochemistry [J].
Cordova, Claudio ;
Munoz, Roberto ;
Olivares, Rodrigo ;
Minonzio, Jean-Gabriel ;
Lozano, Carlo ;
Gonzalez, Paulina ;
Marchant, Ivanny ;
Gonzalez-Arriagada, Wilfredo ;
Olivero, Pablo .
ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2023, 25 (02)
[5]   Landscape of dietary factors associated with risk of gastric cancer: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies [J].
Fang, Xuexian ;
Wei, Jiayu ;
He, Xuyan ;
An, Peng ;
Wang, Hao ;
Jiang, Li ;
Shao, Dandan ;
Liang, Han ;
Li, Yi ;
Wang, Fudi ;
Min, Junxia .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 51 (18) :2820-2832
[6]   Diagnostic and prognostic value of CEA, CA19-9, AFP and CA125 for early gastric cancer [J].
Feng, Fan ;
Tian, Yangzi ;
Xu, Guanghui ;
Liu, Zhen ;
Liu, Shushang ;
Zheng, Gaozan ;
Guo, Man ;
Lian, Xiao ;
Fan, Daiming ;
Zhang, Hongwei .
BMC CANCER, 2017, 17
[7]   Prognostic value of peripheral blood neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, platelet/lymphocyte ratio, pan-immune-inflammation value and systemic immune-inflammation index for the efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer [J].
Fu, Maodong ;
Zhang, Xiuping ;
Shen, Feng ;
Ma, Jun ;
Li, Zhiyong .
IMMUNOTHERAPY, 2024, 16 (08) :551-563
[8]   Risk Prediction for Gastric Cancer Using GWAS-Identifie Polymorphisms, Helicobacter pylori Infection and Lifestyle-Related Risk Factors in a Japanese Population [J].
Ishikura, Naoyo ;
Ito, Hidemi ;
Oze, Isao ;
Koyanagi, Yuriko N. ;
Kasugai, Yumiko ;
Taniyama, Yukari ;
Kawakatsu, Yukino ;
Tanaka, Tsutomu ;
Ito, Seiji ;
Tajika, Masahiro ;
Shimizu, Yasuhiro ;
Niwa, Yasumasa ;
Matsuo, Keitaro .
CANCERS, 2021, 13 (21)
[9]   Preoperative Prediction of Perineural Invasion and Prognosis in Gastric Cancer Based on Machine Learning through a Radiomics-Clinicopathological Nomogram [J].
Jia, Heng ;
Li, Ruzhi ;
Liu, Yawei ;
Zhan, Tian ;
Li, Yuan ;
Zhang, Jianping .
CANCERS, 2024, 16 (03)
[10]  
Kim SG., 2022, J Clin Med, V11, P11