Detection of breast cancer in digital breast tomosynthesis with vision transformers

被引:1
|
作者
Kassis, Idan [1 ]
Lederman, Dror [2 ]
Ben-Arie, Gal [3 ]
Rosenthal, Maia Giladi [4 ]
Shelef, Ilan [3 ]
Zigel, Yaniv [1 ]
机构
[1] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Dept Biomed Engn, IL-8410501 Beer Sheva, Israel
[2] Holon Inst Technol, Fac Engn, IL-5810201 Holon, Israel
[3] Soroka Med Ctr, Imaging Inst, IL-84101 Beer Sheva, Israel
[4] Soroka Med Ctr, Breast Hlth Ctr, IL-84101 Beer Sheva, Israel
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2024年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
CLASSIFICATION; UPDATE;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-024-72707-2
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) has revolutionized more traditional breast imaging through its three-dimensional (3D) visualization capability that significantly enhances lesion discernibility, reduces tissue overlap, and improves diagnostic precision as compared to conventional two-dimensional (2D) mammography. In this study, we propose an advanced Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) system that harnesses the power of vision transformers to augment DBT's diagnostic efficiency. This scheme uses a neural network to glean attributes from the 2D slices of DBT followed by post-processing that considers features from neighboring slices to categorize the entire 3D scan. By leveraging a transfer learning technique, we trained and validated our CAD framework on a unique dataset consisting of 3,831 DBT scans and subsequently tested it on 685 scans. Of the architectures tested, the Swin Transformer outperformed the ResNet101 and vanilla Vision Transformer. It achieved an impressive AUC score of 0.934 +/- 0.026 at a resolution of 384 x\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\times$$\end{document} 384. Increasing the image resolution from 224 to 384 not only maintained vital image attributes but also led to a marked improvement in performance (p-value = 0.0003). The Mean Teacher algorithm, a semi-supervised method using both labeled and unlabeled DBT slices, showed no significant improvement over the supervised approach. Comprehensive analyses across different lesion types, sizes, and patient ages revealed consistent performance. The integration of attention mechanisms yielded a visual narrative of the model's decision-making process that highlighted the prioritized regions during assessments. These findings should significantly propel the methodologies employed in DBT image analysis by setting a new benchmark for breast cancer diagnostic precision.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis for detection of breast cancer in the intraoperative specimen during breast-conserving surgery
    Urano, Misugi
    Shiraki, Norio
    Kawai, Tatsuya
    Goto, Taeko
    Endo, Yumi
    Yoshimoto, Nobuyasu
    Toyama, Tatsuya
    Shibamoto, Yuta
    BREAST CANCER, 2016, 23 (05) : 706 - 711
  • [32] Breast cancer detection using machine learning in digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis: A systematic review
    Malliori, A.
    Pallikarakis, N.
    HEALTH AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 12 (05) : 893 - 910
  • [33] Development of digital breast tomosynthesis and diffuse optical tomography fusion imaging for breast cancer detection
    Eun Young Chae
    Hak Hee Kim
    Sohail Sabir
    Yejin Kim
    Hyeongseok Kim
    Sungho Yoon
    Jong Chul Ye
    Seungryong Cho
    Duchang Heo
    Kee Hyun Kim
    Young Min Bae
    Young-Wook Choi
    Scientific Reports, 10
  • [34] Development of digital breast tomosynthesis and diffuse optical tomography fusion imaging for breast cancer detection
    Chae, Eun Young
    Kim, Hak Hee
    Sabir, Sohail
    Kim, Yejin
    Kim, Hyeongseok
    Yoon, Sungho
    Ye, Jong Chul
    Cho, Seungryong
    Heo, Duchang
    Kim, Kee Hyun
    Bae, Young Min
    Choi, Young-Wook
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [35] Breast cancer detection using machine learning in digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis: A systematic review
    A. Malliori
    N. Pallikarakis
    Health and Technology, 2022, 12 : 893 - 910
  • [36] Imaging features of breast cancers on digital breast tomosynthesis according to molecular subtype: association with breast cancer detection
    Lee, Su Hyun
    Chang, Jung Min
    Shin, Sung Ui
    Chu, A. Jung
    Yi, Ann
    Cho, Nariya
    Moon, Woo Kyung
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 90 (1080):
  • [37] COMPARISON BETWEEN DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY AND DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF BREAST CANCER
    Jari, Irina
    Naum, A. G.
    Gheorghe, Liliana
    Negru, D.
    Ursaru, Manuela
    MEDICAL-SURGICAL JOURNAL-REVISTA MEDICO-CHIRURGICALA, 2019, 123 (01): : 102 - 108
  • [38] Association of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography With Cancer Detection and Recall Rates by Age and Breast Density
    Conant, Emily F.
    Barlow, William E.
    Herschorn, Sally D.
    Weaver, Donald L.
    Beaber, Elisabeth F.
    Tosteson, Anna N. A.
    Haas, Jennifer S.
    Lowry, Kathryn P.
    Stout, Natasha K.
    Trentham-Dietz, Amy
    diFlorio-Alexander, Roberta M.
    Li, Christopher I.
    Schnall, Mitchell D.
    Onega, Tracy
    Sprague, Brian L.
    Haas, Jennifer S.
    Onega, Tracy
    Tosteson, Anna N. A.
    Birdwell, Robyn
    Khorasani, Ramin
    Lacson, Ronilda
    Ozanne, Elissa
    Tosteson, Tor D.
    Bronson, Mackenzie
    Chen, Jane
    Goodrich, Martha
    Harris, Kimberly A.
    St Hubert, Stella
    Pearson, Loretta
    Andrews, Steven
    Anton, Kristen
    Batcho, Katrine
    Brawarsky, Phyllis
    Cook, Charles
    Das, Amar
    Dougher, Ryan
    Eliassen, Scottie
    Farr, Scott
    Felone, Carol
    Frazee, Tracy
    Gerlach, Scott
    Getty, George
    Gilman, John
    Hanson, Dick
    Johnson, Dennis
    Joseph, Brenda
    Laam, Leslie A.
    Levin, Brian
    Pyle, Steven
    Sims-Larabee, Laura
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2019, 5 (05) : 635 - 642
  • [39] Digital breast tomosynthesis
    Hellerhoff, K.
    RADIOLOGE, 2010, 50 (11): : 991 - 998
  • [40] Digital breast tomosynthesis
    Maidment, A.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (06) : 2184 - 2185