Mortality after treatment of malignant pleural effusions with indwelling pleural catheters versus chemical pleurodesis: a population-based study

被引:0
|
作者
Kwok, Chanel [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Thavorn, Kednapa [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Amjadi, Kayvan [1 ]
Aaron, Shawn D. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Kendzerska, Tetyana [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Fac Med, Dept Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] ICES Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Ottawa, Sch Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[5] Ottawa Hosp, Div Respirol, Box 211, 501 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada
关键词
Pleural Neoplasms; Palliative Medicine; Survival; TALC PLEURODESIS; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; MANAGEMENT; CANCER; VALIDATION; SURVIVAL; TRENDS; CARE;
D O I
10.1186/s12931-024-03023-6
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Little is known about patient outcomes following treatment of malignant pleural effusions (MPE) in the real-world setting. Research questionWe aimed to compare post-procedure all-cause mortality between individuals who received indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) insertion versus chemical pleurodesis for managing MPEs. Study design and methods We performed a retrospective population-based study using provincial health administrative data (Ontario, Canada) of adults with a MPE who underwent IPC insertion or chemical pleurodesis between 2015 and 2019. Individuals were followed until death or March 31, 2021. Difference in post-procedure mortality was calculated using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted Cox proportional hazard regression analysis to balance potential confounders at baseline. Results We identified 4,790 (77.3%) individuals who received an IPC and 1,407 (22.7%) who had chemical pleurodesis for MPE. IPC insertions are increasing and chemical pleurodesis procedures are decreasing. The majority of IPCs were inserted in outpatients (61%), by pulmonologists (64.2%) and at sites with higher annual IPC volume, while chemical pleurodesis procedures were generally done by thoracic surgeons (74%) and at sites with higher annual pleurodesis volumes. In unadjusted comparison median time from initial cancer diagnosis to intervention was significantly longer in the IPC group (244 days, interquartile range [IQR]:33-903) compared to pleurodesis group (81 days, IQR:10-737; p < 0.0001). Unadjusted median time from index procedure to death was significantly longer in the pleurodesis group (165[IQR:48-457] days vs. 81[IQR:29-256] days, p < 0.0001), however the difference between groups became insignificant after the IPTW was applied (HR 1.27, 95%CI 0.95-1.69). 35% of IPCs were removed prior to death or end of follow-up. Interpretation After adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics there was no difference in post-procedure mortality between IPC and chemical pleurodesis groups. In the real world, there are significant differences in the characteristics of patients who receive these two procedures and notable regional practice variation between procedure use. Future research should evaluate these variations in care and their effect on patient outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Resource Use and Costs of Indwelling Pleural Catheters versus Pleurodesis for Malignant Pleural Effusions A Population-based Study
    Kwok, Chanel
    Thavorn, Kednapa
    Amjadi, Kayvan
    Aaron, Shawn D.
    Kendzerska, Tetyana
    ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY, 2024, 21 (06) : 940 - 948
  • [2] Pleural controversy: Pleurodesis versus indwelling pleural catheters for malignant effusions
    Maceachern, Paul
    Tremblay, Alain
    RESPIROLOGY, 2011, 16 (05) : 747 - 754
  • [3] Management of malignant pleural effusions with indwelling pleural catheters or talc pleurodesis
    Srour, Nadim
    Amjadi, Kayvan
    Forster, Alan John
    Aaron, Shawn David
    CANADIAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2013, 20 (02) : 106 - 110
  • [4] Indwelling Pleural Catheter versus Pleurodesis for Malignant Pleural Effusions
    Iyer, Narayan P.
    Reddy, Chakravarthy B.
    Wahidi, Momen M.
    Lewis, Sandra Z.
    Diekemper, Rebecca L.
    Feller-Kopman, David
    Gould, Michael K.
    Balekian, Alex A.
    ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY, 2019, 16 (01) : 124 - 131
  • [5] Pleural controversies: indwelling pleural catheter vs. pleurodesis for malignant pleural effusions
    Fortin, Marc
    Tremblay, Alain
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2015, 7 (06) : 1052 - 1057
  • [6] The use of indwelling pleural catheters for the treatment of malignant pleural effusions
    Syer, Tom
    Walker, Steven
    Maskell, Nick
    EXPERT REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2019, 13 (07) : 659 - 664
  • [7] Multimodal approach to the management of malignant pleural effusions: role of thoracoscopy with pleurodesis and tunneled indwelling pleural catheters
    Agrawal, Abhinav
    Murgu, Septimiu
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2020, 12 (05) : 2803 - 2811
  • [8] Outcomes for Malignant Pleural Effusions Because of Melanoma Treated With Indwelling Pleural Catheters
    Masoudian, Pourya
    Kwok, Chanel
    Li, Pen
    Hosseini, Sarah
    Zhang, Tinghua
    Amjadi, Kayvan
    JOURNAL OF BRONCHOLOGY & INTERVENTIONAL PULMONOLOGY, 2023, 30 (03) : 244 - 251
  • [9] Patient perspectives on the use of indwelling pleural catheters in malignant pleural effusions
    Mitchell, Michael A.
    Deschner, Emilie
    Dhaliwal, Inderdeep
    Robinson, Michael
    Li, Pen
    Kwok, Chanel
    Cake, Lorraine
    Dawson, Emily
    Veenstra, James
    Stollery, Daniel
    Gillson, Ashley-Mae
    Amjadi, Kayvan
    THORAX, 2023, 78 (11) : 1111 - 1117
  • [10] Quality-Adjusted Survival Following Treatment of Malignant Pleural Effusions With Indwelling Pleural Catheters
    Ost, David E.
    Jimenez, Carlos A.
    Lei, Xiudong
    Cantor, Scott B.
    Grosu, Horiana B.
    Lazarus, Donald R.
    Faiz, Saadia A.
    Bashoura, Lara
    Shannon, Vickie R.
    Balachandran, Dave
    Noor, Lailla
    Hashmi, Yousra B.
    Casal, Roberto F.
    Morice, Rodolfo C.
    Eapen, George A.
    CHEST, 2014, 145 (06) : 1347 - 1356