Comparative analysis of regulations and studies on stem cell therapies: focusing on induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-based treatments

Stem cell therapies have emerged as a promising approach in regenerative medicine, demonstrating potential in personalized medicine, disease modeling, and drug discovery. Therapies based on induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) particularly stand out for their ability to differentiate into various cell types while avoiding ethical concerns. However, the development and application of these therapies are influenced by varying regulatory frameworks across countries. This study provides a comparative analysis of regulations and research on stem cell therapies in key regions: The European Union (EU), Switzerland, South Korea, Japan, and the United States. First, the study reviews the regulatory frameworks on stem cell therapies. The EU and Switzerland maintain rigorous guidelines that prioritize safety and ethical considerations, which can hinder innovation. In contrast, the United States adopts a more flexible regulatory stance, facilitating the rapid development of stem cell therapies. South Korea and Japan take a balanced approach by incorporating practices from both regimes. These regulatory differences reflect each country's unique priorities and impact the pace and scope of stem cell therapy development. Moreover, the study examines global trends in clinical trials on stem cell treatments based on data obtained from two sources: ClinicalTrials.gov and ICTRP. Findings indicate a significant growth in the number of clinical trials since 2008, particularly in that involving iPSCs. Therapeutic studies involving iPSCs predominantly target conditions affecting the cardiovascular and nervous systems which are considered vital. The results put emphasis on the safety of stem cell treatments. Meanwhile, the number of such trials also varies by country. The United States and Japan, where relatively flexible guidelines on stem cell research are adopted, are in a leading position. However, countries in the EU fall behind with rigorous regulations imposed. This reflects the need for more flexible regulatory guidance for active development of stem cell therapies. The findings underscore the importance of legal frameworks in facilitating innovation while ensuring safety. Regulatory agencies in different countries should collaborate to achieve a balanced global standard to ensure the safe and efficient advancement of stem cell therapies. Global regulatory convergence will promote international collaboration in research and the applicability of new treatments.