Comparison in prostate cancer diagnosis with PSA 4-10 ng/mL: radiomics-based model VS. PI-RADS v2.1

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Chunxing [1 ,2 ]
Jin, Zhicheng [3 ]
Wei, Chaogang [2 ]
Dai, Guangcheng [4 ]
Tu, Jian [5 ]
Shen, Junkang [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Peoples Hosp Yancheng 1, Dept MRI Room, Yancheng First Hosp Affiliated,Med Sch, Yancheng, Peoples R China
[2] Soochow Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Radiol, Suzhou 215004, Peoples R China
[3] Soochow Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Nucl Med, Suzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Soochow Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Urol Surg, Suzhou, Peoples R China
[5] Soochow Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Pathol, Suzhou, Peoples R China
来源
BMC UROLOGY | 2024年 / 24卷 / 01期
关键词
Prostate Cancer; PSA; 4-10; ng/mL; Radiomics; PI-RADS v2.1; MRI; MRI; IMAGES;
D O I
10.1186/s12894-024-01625-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background To evaluate accuracy of MRI-based radiomics in diagnosing prostate cancer (PCa) in patients with PSA levels between 4 and 10 ng/mL and compare it with the latest Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS v2.1) score. Methods 221 patients with prostate lesions and PSA levels in 4-10 ng/mL, including 154 and 67 cases in the training and validation groups. Pathological confirmation of all patients was accomplished by the use of MRI-TRUS fusion targeted biopsy or systematic transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided biopsy. 851 radiomic features were extracted from each lesion of ADC and T2WI images. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression algorithm and logistic regression were employed to select features and build the ADC and T2WI model. The combined model was obtained based on the ADC and T2WI features. The clinical benefit and diagnostic accuracy of the three radiomics models and PI-RADS v2.1 score were evaluated. Results 10 radiomic features were ultimately selected from the ADC images, 13 from the T2WI images and 7 from the combined models. The ADC, T2WI and combined models achieved satisfactory diagnostic accuracy in the training [AUC:0.945 (ADC), 0.939 (T2WI), 0.979 (combined)] and validation groups [AUC: 0.942 (ADC), 0.943 (T2WI), 0.959 (combined)], which was significantly higher than those in PI-RADS v2.1 model (0.825 for training cohort and 0.853 for validation cohort). Compared with the PI-RADS v2.1 score, the three radiomics models generated superior PCa diagnostic performance in both the training (p = 0.002, p = 0.005, p < 0.001) and validation groups (p = 0.045, p = 0.035, p = 0.015). Conclusion Radiomics based on ADC and T2WI images can better identify PCa in patients with PSA 4-10 ng/mL, and MRI-based radiomics significantly outperforms the PI-RADS v2.1 score.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PI-RADS v2.1 and PSAD for the prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer among patients with PSA levels of 4-10 ng/ml
    Wen, Jing
    Liu, Wei
    Shen, Xiaocui
    Hu, Wei
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01)
  • [2] Use of Radiomics to Improve Diagnostic Performance of PI-RADS v2.1 in Prostate Cancer
    Li, Mou
    Yang, Ling
    Yue, Yufeng
    Xu, Jingxu
    Huang, Chencui
    Song, Bin
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 10
  • [3] Based on PI-RADS v2.1 combining PHI and ADC values to guide prostate biopsy in patients with PSA 4-20 ng/mL
    Huang, Hua
    Liu, Zihao
    Ma, Yuan
    Shao, Yuan
    Yang, Zhen
    Duan, Dengyi
    Zhao, Yang
    Wen, Simeng
    Tian, Jing
    Liu, Yang
    Wang, Zeyuan
    Yue, Dan
    Wang, Yong
    PROSTATE, 2024, 84 (04) : 376 - 388
  • [4] MRI Based Radiomics Compared With the PI-RADS V2.1 in the Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Biparametric vs Multiparametric MRI
    Chen, Tong
    Zhang, Zhiyuan
    Tan, Shuangxiu
    Zhang, Yueyue
    Wei, Chaogang
    Wang, Shan
    Zhao, Wenlu
    Qian, Xusheng
    Zhou, Zhiyong
    Shen, Junkang
    Dai, Yakang
    Hu, Jisu
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 11
  • [5] The Role of PSA Density among PI-RADS v2.1 Categories to Avoid an Unnecessary Transition Zone Biopsy in Patients with PSA 4-20ng/mL
    Wang, Zhi-bing
    Wei, Chao-gang
    Zhang, Yue-yue
    Pan, Peng
    Dai, Guang-cheng
    Tu, Jian
    Shen, Jun-kang
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 2021
  • [6] Evaluation of prostate volume in mpMRI: comparison of the recommendations of PI-RADS v2 and PI-RADS v2.1
    Gundogdu, Elif
    Emekli, Emre
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 27 (01) : 15 - 19
  • [7] Index lesion detection in multifocal prostate cancer: Simplified PI-RADS biparametric MRI vs PI-RADS v2.1 multiparametric MRI
    Scialpi, Michele
    Martorana, Eugenio
    Torre, Riccardo
    Scalera, Giovanni Battista
    Belatti, Eugenio
    Improta, Antonio
    Aisa, Maria Cristina
    Burani, Aldo
    Santini, Nicola
    D'Andrea, Alfredo
    Mancioli, Francesco Maria
    Scialpi, Pietro
    Di Blasi, Aldo
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2023, 94 : 108 - 115
  • [8] A nomogram based on PI-RADS v2.1 and clinical indicators for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer in the transition zone
    Wei, Chaogang
    Pan, Peng
    Chen, Tong
    Zhang, Yueyue
    Dai, Guangcheng
    Tu, Jian
    Jiang, Zhen
    Zhao, Wenlu
    Shen, Junkang
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2021, 10 (06) : 2435 - 2446
  • [9] Multiparametric MRI-Based Radiomics for Prostate Cancer Screening With PSA in 4-10 ng/mL to Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies
    Qi, Yafei
    Zhang, Shuaitong
    Wei, Jingwei
    Zhang, Gumuyang
    Lei, Jing
    Yan, Weigang
    Xiao, Yu
    Yan, Shuang
    Xue, Huadan
    Feng, Feng
    Sun, Hao
    Tian, Jie
    Jin, Zhengyu
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2020, 51 (06) : 1890 - 1899
  • [10] The Role of Radiomics in the Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in the PI-RADS v2 and v2.1 Era: A Systematic Review
    Antolin, Andreu
    Roson, Nuria
    Mast, Richard
    Arce, Javier
    Almodovar, Ramon
    Cortada, Roger
    Maceda, Almudena
    Escobar, Manuel
    Trilla, Enrique
    Morote, Juan
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (17)