Use of partial acellular dermal matrix in prepectoral nipple-sparing mastectomy

被引:0
作者
Rowley, Mallory [1 ]
Chernov, Evan [1 ]
Dogaroiu, Anca [1 ]
Upadhyaya, Prashant [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Upstate Med Univ, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA
关键词
Breast reconstruction; Acellular dermal matrix; Mastectomy; IMPLANT BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; CAPSULAR CONTRACTURE; TISSUE EXPANDER; COST-ANALYSIS; SINGLE-STAGE; METAANALYSIS; COVERAGE; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s00238-025-02285-7
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThe nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) offers a reconstruction option to patients who wish for a more subtle scar pattern and to retain their native nipple-areolar complex. Traditionally used acellular dermal matrix (ADM) has been linked to potential complications including seroma, hematoma, and infection, as well as increased operative costs. Our study examines whether using partial ADM to cover the lower pole of the breast implant during NSM prepectoral reconstruction offers comparable, or even better, rates of postoperative complications while minimizing operative costs.MethodsA retrospective chart review of patients who underwent prepectoral nipple-sparing implant-based reconstruction (IBR) using partial ADM (June 2019 - October 2020) was performed. Demographic, perioperative, and post-operative complication information was collected and described using means, standard deviations, and frequencies.ResultsNinety-eight patients (183 breasts) met inclusion criteria, with smoking history (36.73%), prior breast surgery (18.58%), and obesity (18.37%) cited as the most common comorbidities. 12.57% of patients experienced a complication following stage one of reconstruction, with infection as the most common complication (5.46%). Complication rate following stage two was 7.10%, with dehiscence cited as the most common complication (4.92%).ConclusionsThe average cost of ADM for breast reconstruction is upwards of $5,000. While our institution does not utilize full ADM coverage in NSMs, historical trends in the literature demonstrate overall complication rates of 5.9% to as high as 35%. Our study demonstrates that utilizing partial ADM coverage in the setting of NSM offers comparable, if not lower, complication rates at a fraction of the cost.Level of Evidence: Level III, risk/prognostic study.ConclusionsThe average cost of ADM for breast reconstruction is upwards of $5,000. While our institution does not utilize full ADM coverage in NSMs, historical trends in the literature demonstrate overall complication rates of 5.9% to as high as 35%. Our study demonstrates that utilizing partial ADM coverage in the setting of NSM offers comparable, if not lower, complication rates at a fraction of the cost.Level of Evidence: Level III, risk/prognostic study.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Tumor-to-Nipple Distance in Selecting Patients for Nipple-sparing Mastectomy
    Kracoff-Sella, Sharon L.
    Allweis, Tanir M.
    Bokov, Inna
    Kadar-Sfarad, Hadas
    Shifer, Yehonatan
    Golzman, Evgenia
    Egozi, Dana
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2020, 8 (07)
  • [42] Comparing Nipple-sparing Mastectomy to Secondary Nipple Reconstruction A Multi-institutional Study
    Santosa, Katherine B.
    Qi, Ji
    Kim, Hyungjin M.
    Hamill, Jennifer B.
    Pusic, Andrea L.
    Chun, Yoon Sun
    Wilkins, Edwin G.
    Kozlow, Jeffrey H.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2021, 274 (02) : 390 - 395
  • [43] Nipple malposition after nipple-sparing mastectomy and expander–implant reconstruction
    Hiroki Mori
    Noriko Uemura
    Mutsumi Okazaki
    Tsuyoshi Nakagawa
    Takanobu Sato
    Breast Cancer, 2016, 23 : 740 - 744
  • [44] Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Technical Aspects and Aesthetic Outcomes
    Moyer, Hunter R.
    Ghazi, Bahair
    Daniel, Jarrod R.
    Gasgarth, Renee
    Carlson, Grant W.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2012, 68 (05) : 446 - 450
  • [45] Outcomes of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Role of Anatomic Measurements
    Pairawan, Seyed S.
    Cody, Derek
    Kim, Hahns
    Hughes, M. Katherine
    Solomon, Naveenraj
    Senthil, Maheswari
    Garberoglio, Carlos
    Lum, Sharon
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2016, 82 (10) : 944 - 948
  • [46] Subcutaneous Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction
    Shi, Aiping
    Wu, Di
    Li, Xingliang
    Zhang, Shifu
    Li, Sijie
    Xu, Hui
    Xie, Huijun
    Fan, Zhimin
    BREAST CARE, 2012, 7 (02) : 131 - 136
  • [47] When mastectomy becomes inevitable: The nipple-sparing approach
    Petit, JY
    Veronesi, U
    Luini, A
    Orecchia, R
    Rey, PC
    Martella, S
    Didier, F
    De Lorenzi, F
    Rietjens, M
    Garusi, C
    Sonzogni, A
    Galimberti, V
    Leida, E
    Lazzari, R
    Giraldo, A
    BREAST, 2005, 14 (06) : 527 - 531
  • [48] Nipple-sparing Mastectomy: What the Radiologist Should Know
    Lee, Samantha C.
    Mendez-Broomberg, Karen
    Eacobacci, Katherine
    Vincoff, Nina S.
    Gupta, Ekta
    McElligott, Suzanne E.
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2022, 42 (02) : 321 - 339
  • [49] Nipple necrosis rate with submuscular versus prepectoral implant-based reconstruction in nipple sparing mastectomy: Does it differ?
    Elsherif, Ayat
    Bernard, Steven
    Djohan, Risal
    Atallah, Amani
    Tu, Chao
    Valente, Stephanie A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 230 : 57 - 62
  • [50] Nipple-sparing mastectomy with implant reconstruction: the Westmead experience
    Sood, Samriti
    Elder, Elisabeth
    French, James
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 85 (05) : 363 - 367