Use of partial acellular dermal matrix in prepectoral nipple-sparing mastectomy

被引:0
|
作者
Rowley, Mallory [1 ]
Chernov, Evan [1 ]
Dogaroiu, Anca [1 ]
Upadhyaya, Prashant [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Upstate Med Univ, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA
关键词
Breast reconstruction; Acellular dermal matrix; Mastectomy; IMPLANT BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; CAPSULAR CONTRACTURE; TISSUE EXPANDER; COST-ANALYSIS; SINGLE-STAGE; METAANALYSIS; COVERAGE; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s00238-025-02285-7
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThe nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) offers a reconstruction option to patients who wish for a more subtle scar pattern and to retain their native nipple-areolar complex. Traditionally used acellular dermal matrix (ADM) has been linked to potential complications including seroma, hematoma, and infection, as well as increased operative costs. Our study examines whether using partial ADM to cover the lower pole of the breast implant during NSM prepectoral reconstruction offers comparable, or even better, rates of postoperative complications while minimizing operative costs.MethodsA retrospective chart review of patients who underwent prepectoral nipple-sparing implant-based reconstruction (IBR) using partial ADM (June 2019 - October 2020) was performed. Demographic, perioperative, and post-operative complication information was collected and described using means, standard deviations, and frequencies.ResultsNinety-eight patients (183 breasts) met inclusion criteria, with smoking history (36.73%), prior breast surgery (18.58%), and obesity (18.37%) cited as the most common comorbidities. 12.57% of patients experienced a complication following stage one of reconstruction, with infection as the most common complication (5.46%). Complication rate following stage two was 7.10%, with dehiscence cited as the most common complication (4.92%).ConclusionsThe average cost of ADM for breast reconstruction is upwards of $5,000. While our institution does not utilize full ADM coverage in NSMs, historical trends in the literature demonstrate overall complication rates of 5.9% to as high as 35%. Our study demonstrates that utilizing partial ADM coverage in the setting of NSM offers comparable, if not lower, complication rates at a fraction of the cost.Level of Evidence: Level III, risk/prognostic study.ConclusionsThe average cost of ADM for breast reconstruction is upwards of $5,000. While our institution does not utilize full ADM coverage in NSMs, historical trends in the literature demonstrate overall complication rates of 5.9% to as high as 35%. Our study demonstrates that utilizing partial ADM coverage in the setting of NSM offers comparable, if not lower, complication rates at a fraction of the cost.Level of Evidence: Level III, risk/prognostic study.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Immediate prepectoral versus submuscular breast reconstruction in nipple-sparing mastectomy: a retrospective cohort analysis
    Cavalcante, Francisco Pimentel
    Lima, Ticiane Oliveira
    Alcantara, Ryane
    Cardoso, Amanda
    Novita, Guilherme
    Zerwes, Felipe
    Millen, Eduardo
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA, 2024, 46
  • [22] Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction after Nipple-sparing Mastectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Nolan, Ian T.
    Farajzadeh, Matthew M.
    Bekisz, Jonathan M.
    Boyd, Carter J.
    Gibson, Ella G.
    Salibian, Ara A.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2024, 12 (05)
  • [23] ASO Author Reflections: Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Prepectoral Versus Submuscular Reconstruction: Postoperative Complications
    Larson, Kelsey E.
    Braun, Sterling
    Butterworth, James A.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (Suppl 3) : 703 - 704
  • [24] Delay techniques for nipple-sparing mastectomy: A systematic review
    Karian, Laurel S.
    Therattil, Paul J.
    Wey, Philip D.
    Nini, Kevin T.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2017, 70 (02) : 236 - 242
  • [25] Nipple-sparing mastectomy in young versus elderly patients
    Frasson, Antonio Luiz
    Miranda, Isabela
    Vollbrecht, Betina
    Malhone, Carolina
    Falcone, Ana Beatriz
    Barbosa, Fernanda
    Cavalcante, Francisco Pimentel
    Lichtenfels, Martina
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA, 2024, 46
  • [26] Trends and variation in the use of nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer in the United States
    Mark Sisco
    Alexandra M. Kyrillos
    Brittany R. Lapin
    Chihsiung E. Wang
    Katharine A. Yao
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2016, 160 : 111 - 120
  • [27] Trends and variation in the use of nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer in the United States
    Sisco, Mark
    Kyrillos, Alexandra M.
    Lapin, Brittany R.
    Wang, Chihsiung E.
    Yao, Katharine A.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2016, 160 (01) : 111 - 120
  • [28] Nipple Malposition after Nipple-sparing Mastectomy with Implant-based Reconstruction: Understanding Its Occurrence and Prevention
    Shiraishi, Tomohiro
    Suga, Hirotaka
    Tsuji, Naoko
    Harii, Kiyonori
    Takushima, Akihiko
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2024, 3 (02): : 53 - 63
  • [29] Nipple-sparing mastectomy: indications, oncologic safety
    Ananthakrishnan, P.
    Feldman, S.
    MINERVA CHIRURGICA, 2012, 67 (03) : 257 - 270
  • [30] Nipple-sparing mastectomy in modern breast practice
    Murthy, Vijayashree
    Chamberlain, Ronald S.
    CLINICAL ANATOMY, 2013, 26 (01) : 56 - 65