Use of partial acellular dermal matrix in prepectoral nipple-sparing mastectomy

被引:0
作者
Rowley, Mallory [1 ]
Chernov, Evan [1 ]
Dogaroiu, Anca [1 ]
Upadhyaya, Prashant [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Upstate Med Univ, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA
关键词
Breast reconstruction; Acellular dermal matrix; Mastectomy; IMPLANT BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; CAPSULAR CONTRACTURE; TISSUE EXPANDER; COST-ANALYSIS; SINGLE-STAGE; METAANALYSIS; COVERAGE; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s00238-025-02285-7
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThe nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) offers a reconstruction option to patients who wish for a more subtle scar pattern and to retain their native nipple-areolar complex. Traditionally used acellular dermal matrix (ADM) has been linked to potential complications including seroma, hematoma, and infection, as well as increased operative costs. Our study examines whether using partial ADM to cover the lower pole of the breast implant during NSM prepectoral reconstruction offers comparable, or even better, rates of postoperative complications while minimizing operative costs.MethodsA retrospective chart review of patients who underwent prepectoral nipple-sparing implant-based reconstruction (IBR) using partial ADM (June 2019 - October 2020) was performed. Demographic, perioperative, and post-operative complication information was collected and described using means, standard deviations, and frequencies.ResultsNinety-eight patients (183 breasts) met inclusion criteria, with smoking history (36.73%), prior breast surgery (18.58%), and obesity (18.37%) cited as the most common comorbidities. 12.57% of patients experienced a complication following stage one of reconstruction, with infection as the most common complication (5.46%). Complication rate following stage two was 7.10%, with dehiscence cited as the most common complication (4.92%).ConclusionsThe average cost of ADM for breast reconstruction is upwards of $5,000. While our institution does not utilize full ADM coverage in NSMs, historical trends in the literature demonstrate overall complication rates of 5.9% to as high as 35%. Our study demonstrates that utilizing partial ADM coverage in the setting of NSM offers comparable, if not lower, complication rates at a fraction of the cost.Level of Evidence: Level III, risk/prognostic study.ConclusionsThe average cost of ADM for breast reconstruction is upwards of $5,000. While our institution does not utilize full ADM coverage in NSMs, historical trends in the literature demonstrate overall complication rates of 5.9% to as high as 35%. Our study demonstrates that utilizing partial ADM coverage in the setting of NSM offers comparable, if not lower, complication rates at a fraction of the cost.Level of Evidence: Level III, risk/prognostic study.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Acute Postoperative Complications in Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Reconstruction following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy [J].
Avila, Azalia ;
Bartholomew, Alex J. ;
Sosin, Michael ;
Deldar, Romina ;
Griffith, Kayla F. ;
Willey, Shawna C. ;
Song, David H. ;
Fan, Kenneth L. ;
Tousimis, Eleni A. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 146 (06) :715E-720E
[2]   A Prospective Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes of Subpectoral and Prepectoral Strattice-Based Immediate Breast Reconstruction [J].
Baker, Benjamin G. ;
Irri, Renu ;
Chattopadhyay, Vivienne MacCallum Rahul ;
Murphy, John ;
Harvey, James R. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 141 (05) :1077-1084
[3]   Economic Analysis and Review of the Literature on Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction With and Without the Use of the Acellular Dermal Matrix [J].
Bank, Jonathan ;
Phillips, Nicole A. ;
Park, Julie E. ;
Song, David H. .
AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2013, 37 (06) :1194-1201
[4]   Evaluation of a novel breast reconstruction technique using the Braxon® acellular dermal matrix: a new muscle-sparing breast reconstruction [J].
Berna, Giorgio ;
Cawthorn, Simon J. ;
Papaccio, Guido ;
Balestrieri, Nicola .
ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 87 (06) :493-498
[5]   Use of acellular cadaveric dermis and tissue expansion in postmastectomy breast reconstruction [J].
Bindingnavele, Vijay ;
Gaon, Mark ;
Ota, Ken S. ;
Kulber, David A. ;
Lee, Dong-Joon .
JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2007, 60 (11) :1214-1218
[6]   Improving Cost-efficiency in Bilateral Direct-to-Implant Reconstructions with Acellular Dermal Matrix [J].
Buendia, Javier ;
Olivas-Menayo, Jesus .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2019, 7 (09)
[7]   Comparing Complications of Biologic and Synthetic Mesh in Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis [J].
Choi, Young-Soo ;
You, Hi-Jin ;
Lee, Tae-Yul ;
Kim, Deok-Woo .
ARCHIVES OF PLASTIC SURGERY-APS, 2023, 50 (01) :3-9
[8]   Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using Acellular Dermal Matrix and the Risk of Postoperative Complications [J].
Chun, Yoon S. ;
Verma, Kapil ;
Rosen, Heather ;
Lipsitz, Stuart ;
Morris, Donald ;
Kenney, Pardon ;
Eriksson, Elof .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 125 (02) :429-436
[9]   A systematic review of complications associated with direct implants vs. tissue expanders following Wise pattern skin-sparing mastectomy [J].
Corban, Jason ;
Shash, Hani ;
Safran, Tyler ;
Sheppard-Jones, Nicolas ;
Foudae-Neel, Omar .
JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2017, 70 (09) :1191-1199
[10]   Submuscular and Pre-pectoral ADM Assisted Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Literature Review [J].
Cuomo, Roberto .
MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2020, 56 (06)