Empirical case study of a digitally enabled energy community with prosumers and P2P trading

被引:0
作者
Staudt, Philipp [1 ]
Richter, Bent [2 ]
机构
[1] Carl von Ossietzky Univ Oldenburg, Environm & Sustainable Informat Syst, Ammerlaender Heerstr 114-118, D-26129 Oldenburg, Germany
[2] Karlsruhe Inst Technol, Informat & Market Engn, Kaiserstr 10, D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
关键词
RENEWABLE ENERGY; ELECTRICITY DEMAND; CHOICE EXPERIMENT; MARKETS; CONSERVATION; ARCHITECTURE; CONSUMPTION; GERMANY; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1186/s13705-025-00511-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
BackgroundAn 'energy community' can add socioeconomic components to microgrids and has recently been solidified as the regulatory concept of a 'Citizen Energy Community' by the European Union. Such energy communities can further be supplemented with digital capabilities. This paper provides insights from a 13-month case study on a digitally enabled energy community with prosumers with limited ability to provide manual demand response, who were enabled to engage in peer-to-peer trading of local energy generation.ResultsLong-term willingness to pay for local sustainable electricity in the market environment was lower than expected. Overall willingness and ability to provide manual demand response might be low. Participants' use of the provided digital tools were at least partly driven by their desire to control energy costs.ConclusionsRepeat interaction with the energy community's market and its inherent complexities might limit the ability of energy communities to provide technical and economic benefits. This diminishes the appeal of corresponding business models. One direction to make energy communities more attractive to regulators and utilities is the conceptualization, design, and empirical evaluation of systems that lead to low perceived complexity for participants while enabling high levels of external automated control.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 80 条
[51]  
Richter B, 2022, Tech. rep
[52]  
Richter B, 2019, INT CONF EUR ENERG, DOI 10.1109/EEM.2019.8916544
[53]   Sustainable energy communities: a study contrasting Spain and Germany [J].
Romero-Rubio, Carmen ;
de Andres Diaz, Jose Ramon .
ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 85 :397-409
[54]   Electricity powered by blockchain: A review with a European perspective [J].
Roth, Tamara ;
Utz, Manuel ;
Baumgarte, Felix ;
Rieger, Alexander ;
Sedlmeir, Johannes ;
Strueker, Jens .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2022, 325
[55]   How will local energy markets influence the pan-European day-ahead market and transmission systems? A case study for local markets in France and Germany [J].
Schmitt, Carlo ;
Schumann, Klemens ;
Kollenda, Katharina ;
Blank, Andreas ;
Rebenaque, Olivier ;
Dronne, Theo ;
Martin, Arnault ;
Vassilopoulos, Philippe ;
Roques, Fabien ;
Moser, Albert .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2022, 325
[56]   Influencing residential electricity consumption with tailored messages: long-term usage patterns and effects on user experience [J].
Schrammel, Johann ;
Diamond, Lisa M. ;
Froehlich, Peter ;
Mor, Gerard ;
Cipriano, Jordi .
ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY AND SOCIETY, 2023, 13 (01)
[57]  
Schwartz T, 2013, P SIGCHI C HUM FACT, P1193, DOI DOI 10.1145/2470654.2466154
[58]   Renewable energy community and the European energy market: main motivations [J].
Soeiro, Susana ;
Dias, Marta Ferreira .
HELIYON, 2020, 6 (07)
[59]   Renewable and citizen energy communities in the European Union: how (not) to regulate community energy in national laws and policies [J].
Sokolowski, Maciej M. .
JOURNAL OF ENERGY & NATURAL RESOURCES LAW, 2020, 38 (03) :289-304
[60]   Peer-to-peer and community-based markets: A comprehensive review [J].
Sousa, Tiago ;
Soares, Tiago ;
Pinson, Pierre ;
Moret, Fabio ;
Baroche, Thomas ;
Sorin, Etienne .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 104 :367-378