Empirical case study of a digitally enabled energy community with prosumers and P2P trading

被引:0
作者
Staudt, Philipp [1 ]
Richter, Bent [2 ]
机构
[1] Carl von Ossietzky Univ Oldenburg, Environm & Sustainable Informat Syst, Ammerlaender Heerstr 114-118, D-26129 Oldenburg, Germany
[2] Karlsruhe Inst Technol, Informat & Market Engn, Kaiserstr 10, D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
关键词
RENEWABLE ENERGY; ELECTRICITY DEMAND; CHOICE EXPERIMENT; MARKETS; CONSERVATION; ARCHITECTURE; CONSUMPTION; GERMANY; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1186/s13705-025-00511-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
BackgroundAn 'energy community' can add socioeconomic components to microgrids and has recently been solidified as the regulatory concept of a 'Citizen Energy Community' by the European Union. Such energy communities can further be supplemented with digital capabilities. This paper provides insights from a 13-month case study on a digitally enabled energy community with prosumers with limited ability to provide manual demand response, who were enabled to engage in peer-to-peer trading of local energy generation.ResultsLong-term willingness to pay for local sustainable electricity in the market environment was lower than expected. Overall willingness and ability to provide manual demand response might be low. Participants' use of the provided digital tools were at least partly driven by their desire to control energy costs.ConclusionsRepeat interaction with the energy community's market and its inherent complexities might limit the ability of energy communities to provide technical and economic benefits. This diminishes the appeal of corresponding business models. One direction to make energy communities more attractive to regulators and utilities is the conceptualization, design, and empirical evaluation of systems that lead to low perceived complexity for participants while enabling high levels of external automated control.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   User behavior in a real-world peer-to-peer electricity market [J].
Ableitner, Liliane ;
Tiefenbeck, Verena ;
Meeuw, Arne ;
Woerner, Anselma ;
Fleisch, Elgar ;
Wortmann, Felix .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2020, 270
[2]   A review of residential energy feedback studies [J].
Agarwal, Rishika ;
Garg, Madhur ;
Tejaswini, Dharani ;
Garg, Vishal ;
Srivastava, Priyanka ;
Mathur, Jyotirmay ;
Gupta, Rajat .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2023, 290
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2019, DIRECTIVE EU 2019944
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Energy Inf, P31, DOI [10.1186/s42162-019-0098-7, DOI 10.1186/S42162-019-0098-7]
[5]   Designing local renewable energy communities to increase social acceptance: Evidence from a choice experiment in Austria, Germany, Italy, and Switzerland [J].
Azarova, Valeriya ;
Cohen, Jed ;
Friedl, Christina ;
Reichl, Johannes .
ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 132 :1176-1183
[6]   A social-ecological approach to conservation planning: embedding social considerations [J].
Ban, Natalie C. ;
Mills, Morena ;
Tam, Jordan ;
Hicks, Christina C. ;
Klain, Sarah ;
Stoeckl, Natalie ;
Bottrill, Madeleine C. ;
Levine, Jordan ;
Pressey, Robert L. ;
Satterfield, Terre ;
Chan, Kai M. A. .
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 11 (04) :194-202
[7]   A new perspective on the issue of selection bias in randomized controlled field experiments [J].
Belot, Michele ;
James, Jonathan .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2014, 124 (03) :326-328
[8]   Does willingness to pay for green energy differ by source? [J].
Borchers, Allison M. ;
Duke, Joshua M. ;
Parsons, George R. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (06) :3327-3334
[9]  
Bose S., 2021, Energy Informatics, V4, P7, DOI [DOI 10.1186/S42162-021-00147-4, 10.1186/s42162-021-00141-z, DOI 10.1186/S42162-021-00141-Z]
[10]  
Bremdal Bernt A., 2017, CIRED - Open Access Proceedings Journal, V2017, P2649, DOI 10.1049/oap-cired.2017.0730