Development and validation of a machine learning model to predict hemostatic intervention in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding

被引:0
作者
Raghareutai, Kajornvit [1 ]
Tanchotsrinon, Watcharaporn [2 ]
Sattayalertyanyong, Onuma [3 ]
Kaosombatwattana, Uayporn [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Mahidol Univ, Fac Med Siriraj Hosp, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
[2] Mahidol Univ, Siriraj Hosp, Siriraj Informat & Data Innovat Ctr, Bangkok, Thailand
[3] Siriraj Hosp, Siriraj GI Endoscopy Ctr, Bangkok, Thailand
关键词
Machine learning; Upper GI bleeding; UGIB; Endoscopic intervention; Prediction; RISK SCORE; MANAGEMENT; ENDOSCOPY; MORTALITY; CARE; GUIDELINE; SOCIETY; NEED;
D O I
10.1186/s12911-025-02969-x
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundAcute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is common in clinical practice and has a wide range of severity. Along with medical therapy, endoscopic intervention is the mainstay treatment for hemostasis in high-risk rebleeding lesions. Predicting the need for endoscopic intervention would be beneficial in resource-limited areas for selective referral to an endoscopic center. The proposed risk stratification scores had limited accuracy. We developed a machine learning model to predict the need for endoscopic intervention in patients with acute UGIB.MethodsA prospectively collected database of UGIB patients from 2011 to 2020 was retrospectively reviewed. Patients older than 18 years diagnosed with UGIB who underwent endoscopy were included. Data comprised demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, and laboratory parameters. The cleaned data was used for model development and validation in Python. We conducted 80%-20% split sample training and test sets. The training set was used for supervised learning of 15 models using a stratified 5-fold cross-validation process. The model with the highest AUROC was then internally validated with the test set to evaluate performance.ResultsOf 1389 patients, 615 (44.3%) of the cohorts received the endoscopic intervention (293 variceal- and 336 nonvariceal-bleeding interventions). Eighteen features, including demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, and laboratory parameters, were selected as input for 15 machine learning models. The result revealed that the linear discriminant analysis model could achieve the highest AUROC of 0.74 to predict endoscopic intervention. The model was validated with the test set, in which the AUROC was increased from 0.74 to 0.81. Finally, the model was deployed as a web application by Streamlit.ConclusionsOur machine learning model can identify patients with acute UGIB who need endoscopic intervention with good performance. This may help primary care physicians prioritize patients who need referrals and optimize resource allocation in resource-limited areas. Further development and identification of more specific features might improve prediction performance.Trial RegistrationNone (Retrospective cohort study)Patient & Public InvolvementNone
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Three Simple Parameters on Admission to the Emergency Department are Predictors for Endoscopic Intervention in Patients with Suspected Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding [J].
Acehan, Fatih ;
Karsavuranoglu, Buket ;
Kalkan, Cagdas ;
Aslan, Meryem ;
Altiparmak, Emin ;
Ates, Ihsan .
JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2023, 66 (02) :64-73
[2]   An update on the management of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding [J].
Alali, Ali A. ;
Barkun, Alan N. .
GASTROENTEROLOGY REPORT, 2023, 11
[3]   Revolutionizing healthcare: the role of artificial intelligence in clinical practice [J].
Alowais, Shuroug A. ;
Alghamdi, Sahar S. ;
Alsuhebany, Nada ;
Alqahtani, Tariq ;
Alshaya, Abdulrahman I. ;
Almohareb, Sumaya N. ;
Aldairem, Atheer ;
Alrashed, Mohammed ;
Bin Saleh, Khalid ;
Badreldin, Hisham A. ;
Al Yami, Majed S. ;
Al Harbi, Shmeylan ;
Albekairy, Abdulkareem M. .
BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2023, 23 (01)
[4]  
Antunes C, 2023, Upper gastrointestinal bleeding. StatPearls Internet
[5]   International Consensus Recommendations on the Management of Patients With Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding [J].
Barkun, Alan N. ;
Bardou, Marc ;
Kuipers, Ernst J. ;
Sung, Joseph ;
Hunt, Richard H. ;
Martel, Myriam ;
Sinclair, Paul .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2010, 152 (02) :101-+
[6]   A risk score to predict need for treatment for upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage [J].
Blatchford, O ;
Murray, WR ;
Blatchford, M .
LANCET, 2000, 356 (9238) :1318-1321
[7]   Comparison of risk scores in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in western India: A prospective analysis [J].
Chandnani, Sanjay ;
Rathi, Pravin ;
Sonthalia, Nikhil ;
Udgirkar, Suhas ;
Jain, Shubham ;
Contractor, Qais ;
Jain, Samit ;
Singh, Anupam Kumar .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 38 (02) :117-127
[8]   Characteristics and outcomes of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding after therapeutic endoscopy in the elderly [J].
Charatcharoenwitthaya, Phunchai ;
Pausawasdi, Nonthalee ;
Laosanguaneak, Nuttiya ;
Bubthamala, Jakkrapan ;
Tanwandee, Tawesak ;
Leelakusolvong, Somchai .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 17 (32) :3724-3732
[9]  
Davenport Thomas, 2019, Future Healthc J, V6, P94, DOI 10.7861/futurehosp.6-2-94
[10]   Explainable Machine Learning Model for Predicting GI Bleed Mortality in the Intensive Care Unit [J].
Deshmukh, Farah ;
Merchant, Shamel S. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 115 (10) :1657-1668