The different roles of innovation intermediaries to generate value

被引:7
作者
Noviaristanti, Siska [1 ]
Acur, Nuran [2 ]
Mendibil, Kepa [3 ]
机构
[1] Telkom Univ, Sch Econ & Business, Bandung, Indonesia
[2] Univ Glasgow, Adam Smith Business Sch, Glasgow City, Scotland
[3] Univ Strathclyde, Glasgow City, Scotland
关键词
Innovation intermediaries; Orhestration; Innovation management; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGY-TRANSFER; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; KNOWLEDGE BROKERS; DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; STRUCTURAL HOLES; TRIPLE-HELIX; NETWORKS; ORGANIZATIONS; COLLABORATION;
D O I
10.1007/s11301-023-00364-2
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The development of innovation management practices toward openness, societal grand challenges and emerging technologies have changed the roles and supporting activities of innovation intermediaries. Innovation intermediaries are considered to be organizations that generate value to other institutions or societies within an innovation system. Despite the growth of innovation intermediary research in recent years, there is still a lack of clarity about the different roles that intermediaries can play and the way in which they generate value to the other institutions, industry and/or society. This paper reviews current research to identify contemporary roles of innovation intermediaries and explore the mechanisms they use to generate value. Through the use of bibliographic coupling the paper presents a robust analysis of the intellectual streams and key concepts underpinning innovation intermediary research. The paper makes a contribution to the ongoing debate by proposing a framework that explains the different roles of innovation intermediaries (knowledge broker, knowledge transfer enabler, orchestrator, and value generator) and the functions embedded within the roles at different levels of analysis, i.e., firm, industry, and national. The paper concludes by discussing the theoretical and practical implications of the framework and details key areas for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:2545 / 2577
页数:33
相关论文
共 132 条
[1]   Bridging firm-internal boundaries for innovation: Directed communication orientation and brokering roles [J].
Aalbers, Hendrik Leendert ;
Dolfsma, Wilfred .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2015, 36 :97-115
[2]   The magnitude of innovation by demand in a sectoral system: The role of industrial users in semiconductors [J].
Adams, Pamela ;
Fontana, Roberto ;
Malerba, Franco .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2013, 42 (01) :1-14
[3]   CROWDSOURCING AS A SOLUTION TO DISTANT SEARCH [J].
Afuah, Allan ;
Tucci, Christopher L. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2012, 37 (03) :355-375
[4]   Intermediaries for open innovation: A competence-based comparison of knowledge transfer offices practices [J].
Alexander, Allen T. ;
Martin, Dominique Philippe .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2013, 80 (01) :38-49
[5]   bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis [J].
Aria, Massimo ;
Cuccurullo, Corrado .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2017, 11 (04) :959-975
[6]  
Arnold E., 2010, IMPACTS EUROPEAN RTO
[7]   Drivers of technology adoption - the case of nanomaterials in building construction [J].
Arora, Sanjay K. ;
Foley, Rider W. ;
Youtie, Jan ;
Shapira, Philip ;
Wiek, Arnim .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2014, 87 :232-244
[8]   The role of public open innovation intermediaries in local government and the public sector [J].
Bakici, Tuba ;
Almirall, Esteve ;
Wareham, Jonathan .
TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2013, 25 (03) :311-327
[9]   Modeling a Paradigm Shift: From Producer Innovation to User and Open Collaborative Innovation [J].
Baldwin, Carliss ;
von Hippel, Eric .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2011, 22 (06) :1399-1417
[10]   The Extended Map methodology: Technology roadmapping for SMES clusters [J].
Battistella, Cinzia ;
De Toni, Alberto F. ;
Pillon, Roberto .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2015, 38 :1-23