Validation of dosimetry programs (Olinda & IDAC) for evaluation of absorbed dose in 177LuPSMA therapy of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) using Monte Carlo simulation

被引:0
作者
Maroufpour, Sirwan [1 ]
Aryana, Kamran [2 ]
Nasseri, Shahrokh [1 ]
Fazeli, Zahra [2 ]
Arabi, Hossein [3 ]
Momennezhad, Mehdi [1 ]
机构
[1] Mashhad Univ Med Sci, Fac Med, Med Phys Grp, Mashhad, Iran
[2] Mashhad Univ Med Sci, Imam Reza Hosp, Fac Med, Nucl Med Res Ctr, Mashhad, Iran
[3] Geneva Univ Hosp, Div Nucl Med & Mol Imaging, Geneva, Switzerland
来源
EJNMMI PHYSICS | 2024年 / 11卷 / 01期
关键词
Prostate cancer; Lu-177-PSMA; IDAC; OLINDA; GATE; Dosimetry; RADIOLIGAND THERAPY; RADIONUCLIDE THERAPY; NORMAL ORGANS; SPECT; INHIBITOR; RISK;
D O I
10.1186/s40658-024-00691-7
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Clinical trials have yielded promising results for (177)Lutetium Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (Lu-177-PSMA) therapy in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. However, the development of precise methods for internal dosimetry and accurate dose estimation has been considered ongoing research. This study aimed to calculate the absorbed dose to the critical organs and metastasis regions using GATE 9.0 Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) as a gold standard to compare the OLINDA 1.1 and IDAC 2.1 software. Material and Methods: This study investigated absorbed doses to different organs in 9 mCRPC patients during their first treatment cycle. Whole-body planar images were acquired at 1 +/- 0.5, 4 +/- 0.5, 24 +/- 2, 48 +/- 2, 72 +/- 2, and 144 +/- 2 h post-injection, with SPECT/CT images obtained at 24 +/- 2 h. Absorbed doses were calculated for five organs and the entire metastasis regions using GATE, OLINDA, and IDAC platforms. The spherical method was used to determine and compare the absorbed doses in metastatic regions and undefined organs in OLINDA and IDAC Phantom. Results: The organ-absorbed dose calculations produced by GATE were consistent with those obtained from OLINDA and IDAC. The average percentage differences in absorbed dose for all organs between Monte Carlo calculations and the estimated from IDAC and OLINDA were -0.24 +/- 2.14% and 5.16 +/- 5.66%, respectively. There was a significant difference between GATE and both IDAC (17.55 +/- 29.1%) and OLINDA (25.86 +/- 18.04%) in determining absorbed doses to metastatic areas using the spherical model. Conclusion: The absorbed dose of organs in the first treatment cycle remained below tolerable limits. However, cumulative absorbed doses should be considered for the administered activities in the next cycles of treatment. While Monte Carlo, IDAC, and OLINDA results were aligned for organ dose calculations, patient-specific dosimetry may be necessary due to anatomical and functional changes. Accurate dose estimation for undefined organs and metastatic regions using the spherical model is significantly influenced by tissue density, highlighting the value of CT imaging.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2013, Rep Radiother Oncol
  • [2] Comparative study of algorithms for synthetic CT generation from MRI: Consequences for MRI-guided radiation planning in the pelvic region
    Arabi, Hossein
    Dowling, Jason A.
    Burgos, Ninon
    Han, Xiao
    Greer, Peter B.
    Koutsouvelis, Nikolaos
    Zaidi, Habib
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (11) : 5218 - 5233
  • [3] 177Lu-Labeled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Radioligand Therapy of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Safety and Efficacy
    Baum, Richard P.
    Kulkarni, Harshad R.
    Schuchardt, Christiane
    Singh, Aviral
    Wirtz, Martina
    Wiessalla, Stefan
    Schottelius, Margret
    Mueller, Dirk
    Klette, Ingo
    Wester, Hans-Juergen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2016, 57 (07) : 1006 - 1013
  • [4] Quantitative 177Lu SPECT (QSPECT) imaging using a commercially available SPECT/CT system
    Beauregard, Jean-Mathieu
    Hofman, Michael S.
    Pereira, Jucilene M.
    Eu, Peter
    Hicks, Rodney J.
    [J]. CANCER IMAGING, 2011, 11 (01) : 56 - 66
  • [5] Brosch-Lenz J, 2021, EJNMMI PHYS, V8, DOI 10.1186/s40658-021-00369-4
  • [6] Patient dosimetry of 177Lu-PSMA I&T in metastatic prostate cancer treatment: the experience in Thailand
    Chatachot, Kotchakorn
    Shiratori, Shuichi
    Chaiwatanarat, Tawatchai
    Khamwan, Kitiwat
    [J]. ANNALS OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2021, 35 (11) : 1193 - 1202
  • [7] Dosimetry for 177Lu-DKFZ-PSMA-617: a new radiopharmaceutical for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer
    Delker, Andreas
    Fendler, Wolfgang Peter
    Kratochwil, Clemens
    Brunegraf, Anika
    Gosewisch, Astrid
    Gildehaus, Franz Josef
    Tritschler, Stefan
    Stief, Christian Georg
    Kopka, Klaus
    Haberkorn, Uwe
    Bartenstein, Peter
    Boening, Guido
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2016, 43 (01) : 42 - 51
  • [8] Dewaraja YK, 2012, J NUCL MED, V53, P1310, DOI 10.2967/jnumed.111.100123
  • [9] Preliminary experience with dosimetry, response and patient reported outcome after 177Lu-PSMA-617 therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
    Fendler, Wolfgang P.
    Reinhardt, Svenja
    Ilhan, Harun
    Delker, Andreas
    Boening, Guido
    Gildehaus, Franz J.
    Stief, Christian
    Bartenstein, Peter
    Gratzke, Christian
    Lehner, Sebastian
    Rominger, Axel
    [J]. ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (02) : 3581 - 3590
  • [10] Comparison of different calculation techniques for absorbed dose assessment in patient specific peptide receptor radionuclide therapy
    Finocchiaro, Domenico
    Berenato, Salvatore
    Bertolini, Valentina
    Castellani, Gastone
    Lanconelli, Nico
    Versari, Annibale
    Spezi, Emiliano
    Iori, Mauro
    Fioroni, Federica
    Grassi, Elisa
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (08):