Evaluating the therapeutic potential of different sources of mesenchymal stem cells in acute respiratory distress syndrome

BackgroundMesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) have attracted interest as a potential therapy given their anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties. However, clinical trials using MSCs for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) have produced mixed and inconclusive data. In previous work, we performed a "head-to-head" comparison between different sources of MSCs and showed that each source had a unique genomic and proteomic "signature".MethodThis study investigated which sources of MSC: bone marrow derived-MSCs (BM-MSCs), adipose tissue derived-MSCs (AD-MSCs) and umbilical cord derived-MSCs (UC-MSCs) would be the optimal candidate to be used as a therapy in an LPS-induced mouse model of ARDS. Immune cells assessment, tissue transcriptomics, animal survival, and endothelial-epithelial barrier assessment were used to evaluate their effects.ResultsWhen comparing the three most commonly used MSC sources, we found that UC-MSCs exhibited greater efficacy compared to other MSCs in improving animal survival, mitigating epithelial/endothelial damage, decreasing lung inflammation via reducing neutrophil infiltration, T cell proliferation, and M1 polarization. Bulk RNA sequencing of lung tissue also showed that UC-MSCs have the capability to downregulate extracellular trap formation, by the downregulation of key genes like Elane and Padi4. Notably, treatment with UC-MSCs demonstrated a significant reduction in Fc-gamma R mediated phagocytosis, which has been associated with monocyte pyroptosis and intense inflammation in the context of COVID-19.ConclusionOur findings suggest that UC-MSCs are an optimal source of MSC to treat acute inflammatory conditions in the lungs, such as ARDS.