LLMs, Truth, and Democracy: An Overview of Risks

被引:0
作者
Coeckelbergh, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Dept Philosophy, Vienna, Austria
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Truth; Democracy; Epistemic agency; Bullshit;
D O I
10.1007/s11948-025-00529-0
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
While there are many public concerns about the impact of AI on truth and knowledge, especially when it comes to the widespread use of LLMs, there is not much systematic philosophical analysis of these problems and their political implications. This paper aims to assist this effort by providing an overview of some truth-related risks in which LLMs may play a role, including risks concerning hallucination and misinformation, epistemic agency and epistemic bubbles, bullshit and relativism, and epistemic anachronism and epistemic incest, and by offering arguments for why these problems are not only epistemic issues but also raise problems for democracy since they undermine its epistemic basis- especially if we assume democracy theories that go beyond minimalist views. I end with a short reflection on what can be done about these political-epistemic risks, pointing to education as one of the sites for change.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Arendt Hannah., 2006, Between Past and Future, P223
[2]  
Arendt Hannah., 1951, Origins of Totalitarianism
[3]  
Arendt Hannah., 1972, CRISES REPUBLIC
[4]  
Cadwalladr Carol, 2018, Guardian
[5]  
Coeckelbergh M., 2024, Polity
[6]   Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence [J].
Mark Coeckelbergh .
AI and Ethics, 2023, 3 (4) :1341-1350
[7]  
Estlund DM, 2008, DEMOCRATIC AUTHORITY: A PHILOSOPHICAL FRAMEWORK, P1
[8]  
Frankfurt HG, 2005, ON BULLSHIT, P1
[9]   Analysis of Beliefs Acquired from a Conversational AI: Instruments-based Beliefs, Testimony-based Beliefs, and Technology-based Beliefs [J].
Freiman, Ori .
EPISTEME-A JOURNAL OF INDIVIDUAL AND SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY, 2024, 21 (03) :1031-1047
[10]  
Goldman A., 2019, STANFORD ENCY PHILOS