Comparative analysis of the efficacy of oblique lateral interbody fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation

被引:0
作者
Chen, Daodong [1 ]
Liu, Tao [1 ]
Du, Kunyang [1 ]
Zhu, Zhenjun [1 ]
机构
[1] Xinxiang Med Univ, Xinxiang Cent Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Clin Coll 4, 56 Jinsui Ave, Xinxiang 453000, Henan, Peoples R China
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2024年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
Lumbar disc herniation; Oblique lateral Interbody Fusion; Transforaminal lumbar Interbody Fusion; Afusion rate; Postoperative recovery; DISKECTOMY;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-024-81261-w
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) often necessitates surgical intervention when conservative treatments fail. Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF) and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) are two commonly used techniques for treating LDH, each offering distinct surgical approaches. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of OLIF versus TLIF in terms of pain relief, functional outcomes, spinal alignment correction, fusion success, and postoperative recovery. A retrospective study was conducted on 133 patients who underwent either OLIF (n = 68) or TLIF (n = 65) between January 2020 and December 2022. Data on patient demographics, pain and functional outcomes (measured by Visual Analogue Scale [VAS] and Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]), radiological outcomes (sagittal and coronal Cobb angles, apical vertebra deviation), fusion and collapse rates, and postoperative recovery (ambulation time and hospitalization duration) were collected. Statistical analysis was performed using t-tests and chi-square tests, with significance set at P < 0.05. Both groups demonstrated significant postoperative improvements in pain and functional outcomes. OLIF resulted in significantly better long-term pain reduction (VAS 1.99 +/- 0.67 vs. 2.29 +/- 0.92, P = 0.03) and greater spinal alignment correction, particularly in sagittal Cobb angle and apical vertebra deviation (P < 0.001). The fusion rate was similar between OLIF (97.92%) and TLIF (96.61%, P = 0.56), but OLIF had a lower collapse rate (8.33% vs. 18.64%, P < 0.001). OLIF also facilitated faster postoperative recovery, with earlier ambulation and shorter hospitalization time (P < 0.001 for both). While both OLIF and TLIF are effective for treating LDH, OLIF offers superior long-term pain relief, better spinal alignment correction, reduced collapse rates, and faster recovery. These findings suggest that OLIF may be a more advantageous option for patients requiring lumbar interbody fusion.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Ahn, Junyoung
    Tabaraee, Ehsan
    Singh, Kern
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2015, 28 (06): : 222 - 225
  • [2] Technical Notes and Clinical Outcomes of Full-Endoscopic Interbody Fusion Via Transforaminal Approach for Hard Disc Herniations in Thoracolumbar Junction
    Cao, Zheng
    Li, Zhen-Zhou
    Zhao, Hong-Liang
    Zhu, Jia-Liang
    Hou, Shu-Xun
    [J]. ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2023, 15 (07) : 1893 - 1903
  • [3] Clinical Effect of Minimally Invasive Microendoscopic-Assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-Level Lumbar Disc Herniation
    Chen, Gang
    Li, Long Biao
    Shangguan, Zhitao
    Wang, Zhenyu
    Liu, Wenge
    Li, Jiandong
    [J]. ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2022, 14 (12) : 3300 - 3312
  • [4] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion Versus Microdiscectomy Without Fusion for Recurrent Lumbar Disk Herniation: A Prospective Comparative Study
    D'Oria, Salvatore
    Giraldi, David
    Murrone, Domenico
    Salamone, Giuseppe Giovanni
    Tomatis, Alberto
    Colamaria, Antonio
    Carbone, Francesco
    Rossitto, Martina
    Fanelli, Vincenzo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2023, 31 (22) : 1157 - 1164
  • [5] Comparing oblique lumbar interbody fusion with lateral screw fixation and percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (OLIF-PETD) and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation complicated with lumbar instability
    Deng, Chen
    Feng, Haoyu
    Ma, Xun
    Chen, Chen
    Mei, Jun
    Sun, Lin
    [J]. BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [6] Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Management of Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation
    El-Kader, Haitham El-Beltagy Abd
    [J]. ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2016, 10 (01) : 52 - 58
  • [7] Fusion's Location and Quality within the Fixated Segment Following Transforaminal Interbody Fusion (TLIF)
    Essa, Ahmad
    Shehade, Munder
    Rabau, Oded
    Smorgick, Yossi
    Mirovsky, Yigal
    Anekstein, Yoram
    [J]. HEALTHCARE, 2023, 11 (21)
  • [8] Comparison of Functional Outcomes Between Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery and Discectomy in Massive Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Analysis
    Gupta, Anuj
    Chhabra, H. S.
    Nagarjuna, D.
    Arora, Mohit
    [J]. GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 11 (05) : 690 - 696
  • [9] Hu ZX, 2022, EUR REV MED PHARMACO, V26, P6678, DOI 10.26355/eurrev_202209_29769
  • [10] Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Clinical and Radiological Results of Mean 46-Month Follow-Up
    Lee, Sang-Ho
    Erken, H. Yener
    Bae, Junseok
    [J]. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 2017