Adolescent vs. Young Adult Idiopathic Scoliosis patients: how different are their two year postoperative radiographic and clinical outcomes?

被引:0
作者
Dionne, Alexandra C. [1 ,3 ]
Lenke, Lawrence G. [3 ]
Hassan, Fthimnir M. [3 ]
Nnake, Chidebelum [1 ]
Blanchard, Simon [1 ]
Reyes, Justin L. [3 ]
Miller, Roy [2 ,3 ]
Lombardi, Joseph M. [3 ]
Sardar, Zeeshan M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Vagelos Coll Phys & Surg, New York, NY USA
[2] Touro Univ, New York Med Coll, Valhalla, NY 10595 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Spine Hosp NewYork Presbyterian, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Med Ctr, New York, NY 10032 USA
关键词
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Adult idiopathic scoliosis; Complications; Revision; Patient reported outcomes; Long term outcomes; T1 PELVIC ANGLE; SELECTIVE THORACIC FUSION; SAGITTAL DEFORMITY; SPINAL-FUSION; REVISION; SURGERY; RISK; AGE;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-024-08621-y
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose To compare the long-term outcomes among AIS (10-18 years) and young AdIS (YAdIS) (19-40 years) patients with minimum 2 year follow up. Methods A retrospective review of AIS and YAdIS patients who underwent primary corrective surgery at a single center was conducted. Demographic, radiographic, operative data, patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), including the ODI and SRS-22r, and long-term complications were collected. A 1:1 propensity score matched (PSM) analysis was implemented to limit selection bias by controlling for gender, curve type, total instrumented levels (TIL), and main coronal cobb angle. Results 95 patients (60 AIS, 35 YAdIS) were identified. Following PSM, 27 matched pairs were identified. AIS patients had greater LL (-55.6 +/- 14.0 vs. -61.8 +/- 11.7, p = 0.0486) at preop, less OR time (4.7 +/- 1.2 h vs. 5.2 +/- 1.5 h, p = 0.0468), intraoperative transfusion rates (70.4% vs. 96.3%, p = 0.0082), and postop Hb (9.0 +/- 1.9 vs. 10.1 +/- 1.4, p = 0.0280) and Hct (26.4 +/- 5.4 vs. 29.7 +/- 3.7, p = 0.0453). YAdIS patients had greater T2-T12 TK (42.7 +/- 13.6 vs. 36.3 +/- 11.0, p = 0.0412), T2-T5 TK (19.4 +/- 9.4 vs. 13.3 +/- 8.7, p = 0.0187), and TPA (12.4 +/- 7.9 vs. 7.4 +/- 8.9, p = 0.0200). There were no significant differences in baseline and 2 year follow up PROMs and in the rates of 2 year complications, including proximal/distal junctional kyphosis (PJK/DJK), pseudarthrosis, rod fracture, curve progression, and revision (p > 0.05). Conclusion Despite differences in operative characteristics, idiopathic scoliosis (IS) patients who underwent corrective surgery at a younger age had comparable PROMs and 2 year outcomes to older patients. Corrective fusion surgery is safe and effective in both adolescents and young adults and may avoid the higher complication rates seen in older adults.
引用
收藏
页码:625 / 634
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] 5-Year Reoperation Risk and Causes for Revision After Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery
    Ahmed, Syed Imraan
    Bastrom, Tracey P.
    Yaszay, Burt
    Newton, Peter O.
    [J]. SPINE, 2017, 42 (13) : 999 - 1005
  • [2] What's new in spine surgery
    Bridwell, Keith H.
    Anderson, Paul A.
    Boden, Scott D.
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    Wang, Jeffrey C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2008, 90A (07) : 1609 - 1619
  • [3] A Comparison Between the Perioperative Outcomes of Female Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) Versus Adult Idiopathic Scoliosis (AdIS) Following Posterior Spinal Fusion: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis Involving 425 Patients
    Chan, Chris Yin Wei
    Abd Gani, Siti Mariam
    Chung, Weng Hong
    Chiu, Chee Kidd
    Hasan, Mohd Shahnaz
    Kwan, Mun Keong
    [J]. GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 13 (01) : 81 - 88
  • [4] Choudhry Muhammad Naghman, 2016, Open Orthop J, V10, P143, DOI 10.2174/1874325001610010143
  • [5] Screening for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force
    Dunn, John
    Henrikson, Nora B.
    Morrison, Caitlin C.
    Blasi, Paula R.
    Nguyen, Matt
    Lin, Jennifer S.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 319 (02): : 173 - 187
  • [6] Selective thoracic fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with C modifier lumbar curves: 2- to 16-year radiographic and clinical results
    Edwards, CC
    Lenke, LG
    Peelle, M
    Sides, B
    Rinella, A
    Bridwell, KH
    [J]. SPINE, 2004, 29 (05) : 536 - 546
  • [7] Screening for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
    Grossman, David C.
    Curry, Susan J.
    Owens, Douglas K.
    Barry, Michael J.
    Davidson, Karina W.
    Doubeni, Chyke A.
    Epling, Johnw., Jr.
    Kemper, Alex R.
    Krist, Alex H.
    Kurth, Ann E.
    Landefeld, Seth
    Mangione, Carol M.
    Phipps, Maureen G.
    Silverstein, Michael
    Simon, Melissa A.
    Tseng, Chien-Wen
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 319 (02): : 165 - 172
  • [8] Repeat surgical interventions following "definitive" instrumentation and fusion for idiopathic scoliosis: a 30-year update
    Jamnik, Adam A. A.
    Datcu, Anne-Marie
    Lachmann, Emily
    Patibandla, Sahiti D. D.
    Thornberg, David
    Jo, Chan-hee
    Morris, William Z. Z.
    Ramo, Brandon
    Johnson, Megan
    [J]. SPINE DEFORMITY, 2024, 12 (01) : 99 - 107
  • [9] Epidemiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
    Konieczny, Markus Rafael
    Senyurt, Huesseyin
    Krauspe, Ruediger
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHILDRENS ORTHOPAEDICS, 2013, 7 (01) : 3 - 9
  • [10] Comparison of operative implications between adolescent and young adult idiopathic scoliosis patients from scoliosis research society mortality and morbidity database
    Kurra, Swamy
    DeMercurio, Prisco
    Lavelle, William F.
    [J]. SPINE DEFORMITY, 2022, 10 (05) : 1133 - 1138