A Systematic Review of Cash Benefit Programs for People Experiencing Homelessness in the United States

被引:0
作者
Katherine Hoops Calhoun [1 ]
Julia Deziel [2 ]
Erin Harrop [1 ]
Daniel Brisson [4 ]
机构
[1] University of Denver,Center for Housing and Homelessness Research
[2] Ohio State University,College of Social Work
[3] University of Denver,Graduate School of Social Work
[4] West Virginia University,School of Medicine
来源
Journal of Policy Practice and Research | 2025年 / 6卷 / 1期
关键词
Homelessness; Public benefits; Cash assistance; Social constructions of poverty; Systematic review;
D O I
10.1007/s42972-024-00112-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Traditionally, responses to homelessness have consisted of transfers of goods and services like food, shelter, and housing vouchers. However, some people who are unhoused qualify for and receive government cash assistance. This systematic review explores existing research on outcomes associated with cash benefit programs for people experiencing homelessness in the United States. Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of cash benefit programs for unhoused adults in the United States and associated outcomes. Our search of 7 databases yielded 506 articles. Ultimately, 16 articles met the inclusion criteria. The eligible articles were coded for 9 variables with results reported narratively. Eight articles explored housing outcomes, and all found that housing outcomes improved with receipt of a cash benefit program. Other articles assessed outcomes related to substance use (n=6, 38%), food security (n=2, 13%), income and economic well-being (n=2, 13%), mental health (n=1, 6%), incarceration (n=1, 6%), and quality of life (n=1, 7%), with studies reporting improvement across all targeted outcomes. Review of current evidence suggests that cash benefit programs improve housing outcomes, and increases economic well-being and quality of life, while decreasing food insecurity.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 45
页数:24
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Aubry T(2020)Effectiveness of permanent supportive housing and income assistance interventions for homeless individuals in high-income countries: A systematic review Lancet Public Health 5 e342-360
[2]  
Bloch G(2001)Examining theoretical models through research synthesis: The benefits of model-driven meta-analysis Evaluation and the Health Professions 24 190-217
[3]  
Brcic V(2021)A rising tide drowns unstable boats: How inequality creates homelessness The Annals of the American Academy 693 28-44
[4]  
Saad A(2020)The public health effects of interventions similar to basic income: A scoping review Lancet Public Health 5 165-176
[5]  
Magwood O(2010)Utilisation of theoretical models and frameworks in the process of evidence synthesis JBI Library of Systematic Reviews 8 730-751
[6]  
Abdalla T(2014)Improving access to benefits for persons with disabilities who were experiencing homelessness: An evaluation of the benefits entitlement services team demonstration project Social Security Bulletin 74 45-55
[7]  
Alkhateeh Q(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[8]  
Xie E(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[9]  
Mathew C(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[10]  
Hannigan T(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined