Unmasking social bots: how confident are we?

被引:0
作者
Giroux, James [1 ]
Ariyarathne, Gangani [1 ]
Nwala, Alexander C. [1 ,2 ]
Fanelli, Cristiano [1 ]
机构
[1] William & Mary, Dept Data Sci, Williamsburg, VA 23185 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Observ Social Media, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
关键词
Uncertainty quantification; Bayesian neural network; Social media; Bot detection; SPAM DETECTION; TWITTER; NEWS;
D O I
10.1140/epjds/s13688-025-00536-y
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Social bots remain a major vector for spreading disinformation on social media and a menace to the public. Despite the progress made in developing multiple sophisticated social bot detection algorithms and tools, bot detection remains a challenging, unsolved problem that is fraught with uncertainty due to the heterogeneity of bot behaviors, training data, and detection algorithms. Detection models often disagree on whether to label the same account as bot or human-controlled. However, they do not provide any measure of uncertainty to indicate how much we should trust their results. We propose to address both bot detection and the quantification of uncertainty at the account level - a novel feature of this research. This dual focus is crucial as it allows us to leverage additional information related to the quantified uncertainty of each prediction, thereby enhancing decision-making and improving the reliability of bot classifications. Specifically, our approach facilitates targeted interventions for bots when predictions are made with high confidence and suggests caution (e.g., gathering more data) when predictions are uncertain.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   A review of uncertainty quantification in deep learning: Techniques, applications and challenges [J].
Abdar, Moloud ;
Pourpanah, Farhad ;
Hussain, Sadiq ;
Rezazadegan, Dana ;
Liu, Li ;
Ghavamzadeh, Mohammad ;
Fieguth, Paul ;
Cao, Xiaochun ;
Khosravi, Abbas ;
Acharya, U. Rajendra ;
Makarenkov, Vladimir ;
Nahavandi, Saeid .
INFORMATION FUSION, 2021, 76 :243-297
[2]  
Allington D, 2021, PSYCHOL MED, V51, P1763, DOI [10.1017/S003329172000224X, 10.1017/S0033291721000593]
[3]  
Beskow DM, 2018, 2018 IEEE/ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN SOCIAL NETWORKS ANALYSIS AND MINING (ASONAM), P825, DOI 10.1109/ASONAM.2018.8508322
[4]   LMBot: Distilling Graph Knowledge into Language Model for Graph-less Deployment in Twitter Bot Detection [J].
Cai, Zijian ;
Tan, Zhaoxuan ;
Lei, Zhenyu ;
Zhu, Zifeng ;
Wang, Hongrui ;
Zheng, Qinghua ;
Luo, Minnan .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 17TH ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WEB SEARCH AND DATA MINING, WSDM 2024, 2024, :57-66
[5]  
Chu Z, 2010, 26TH ANNUAL COMPUTER SECURITY APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE (ACSAC 2010), P21
[6]   Detecting Automation of Twitter Accounts: Are You a Human, Bot, or Cyborg? [J].
Chu, Zi ;
Gianvecchio, Steven ;
Wang, Haining ;
Jajodia, Sushil .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON DEPENDABLE AND SECURE COMPUTING, 2012, 9 (06) :811-824
[7]  
Clayton J, 2023, Doubts cast over Elon Musk's Twitter bot claims
[8]  
Cresci S, 2023, Demystifying misconceptions in social bots
[9]  
Cresci S., 2018, P INT AAAI C WEB SOC, P580, DOI DOI 10.1609/ICWSM.V12I1.15073
[10]   A Decade of Social Bot Detection [J].
Cresci, Stefano .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2020, 63 (10) :72-83