共 23 条
Impact of school salad bars on fruit and vegetable selection, intake, and waste in Mid-Atlantic elementary schools
被引:0
|作者:
Bean, Melanie K.
[1
]
Mazzeo, Suzanne E.
[2
]
de Jonge, Lilian
[3
]
Thornton, Laura
[4
]
Raynor, Hollie
[5
]
Mendoza, Ashley
[1
]
Farthing, Sarah
[1
]
Moore, Bonnie
[6
]
机构:
[1] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Childrens Hosp Richmond, Box 980140, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
[2] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Psychol, Box 842018, Richmond, VA 23284 USA
[3] George Mason Univ, Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Nutr & Food Studies, 4400 Univ Dr MSN 1F7, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
[4] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Dept Psychiat, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[5] Univ Tennessee, Dept Nutr, 1215 W Cumberland Ave, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
[6] Real Food Kids, 6166 Hardy Dr, Mclean, VA 22101 USA
关键词:
Salad bar;
Plate waste;
Fruit and vegetable;
Elementary school;
National School Lunch Program;
STUDENT FRUIT;
CONSUMPTION;
METAANALYSIS;
VALIDITY;
CHILDREN;
LEVEL;
RISK;
D O I:
10.1186/s12966-025-01713-y
中图分类号:
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生];
TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号:
100403 ;
摘要:
Background: Few studies have empirically examined the impact of school salad bars on elementary students' fruit and vegetable (FV) consumption within the National School Lunch Program (NSLP). This natural experiment evaluated the impact of salad bars on FV selection, intake, and waste within elementary schools. Methods: Seven school pairs, matched on Title I status and percentage of students from ethnic or racial minority backgrounds, were randomly selected. All schools served pre-portioned FV at baseline. One school within each pair received a salad bar; the other continued to serve pre-portioned FV (Control). Digital imagery plate waste methods were applied at baseline and 4-6 weeks after schools installed salad bars (post). Images were rated in the laboratory (ICCs = .94-.99) to determine FV selection, intake, and waste (servings [1 NSLP serving = 1/2c]). Multilevel modeling evaluated group (Salad Bar vs Control) and time (baseline vs post) differences and group-by-time interactions. Differences in outcomes by Title I status were also examined. Results: Across schools, mean NSLP participation was 54%. N = 6,623 trays were included (n = 3,273 Salad Bar; n = 3,350 Control). Students in Salad Bar schools selected (+ .44c) and consumed (+ .36c) more FV at post, compared to baseline. Control students decreased FV selection (-.05c) with no change in intake from baseline to post. Group, time, and group-by-time interactions were significant (ps < .0001). When examined separately, results suggest that these effects are driven by fruit. Salad Bar students increased fruit selection (+ .45c), intake (+ .36c), and waste (+ .09c) from baseline to post; no significant changes were observed in Controls. There was no significant change in vegetable selection, intake or waste for either group. Findings did not differ based on Title I status. Conclusions: Salad bars were effective in increasing elementary school students' fruit selection and intake, yet did not increase vegetable selection or intake. Additional efforts are needed to increase vegetable intake and minimize fruit waste from salad bars. Consistent findings across schools, regardless of Title I status, suggest potential for salad bars to yield increased fruit intake across socioeconomic groups. Findings can inform policies designed to increase FV intake within the NSLP. Trial registration: This investigation reports results of a systematic evaluation of school salad bars and does not meet criteria for a clinical trial, yet was retrospectively registered (10/28/22) in clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05605483) as an observational study.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文