A retrospective study of the safety and efficacy of peritoneal dialysis catheter placement under combined local infiltration anesthesia and monitored anesthesia care

Objective Given the lack of global consensus on anesthesia selection for peritoneal dialysis catheter (PDC) placement via open surgery, this study investigates the safety and efficacy of combining local infiltration anesthesia (LIA) with monitored anesthesia care (MAC) in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Methods This retrospective analysis of ESRD patients who underwent open surgical placement of PDC in the Department of Nephrology, the First Affiliated Hospital of the Army Medical University from 1 August 2020 to 31 May 2022. Patients were categorized into two groups based on anesthesia method: LIA group and LIA + MA group. MA was defined as preoperative sedation (0.2-0.7 mu g/kg/h) with dexmedetomidine injection (Huidrican trade name, DEX), and intraoperative analgesia with dexrazoxane injection (Garonin trade name, DEZ) as appropriate according to the patients' pain scores. We compared the general clinical data of the two groups of patients, the changes in blood pressure and heart rate during the whole operation, the intraoperative and postoperative pain, the total duration of the operation and the immediate postoperative complications. Results The study included 123 patients (59 in the LIA + MAC group and 64 in the LIA group). The LIA + MA group exhibited lower pain scores measured by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS) during surgery (skin incision, subcutaneous adipose tissue dissection, anterior fascia, muscle traction, posterior fascia, peritoneum, and catheterization) compared to the LIA group(p<0.05). In terms of surgical incisions, to intraoperative pain scores (VRS), the LIA + MA group showed higher score level I and lower score level II compared to the LIA group (p = 0.002, 0.004, respectively). The LIA + MA group experienced lower postoperative resting pain (NRS) and VAS than the LIA group (p = 0.001,0.003, respectively). The surgical duration for the LIA + MA group was shorter than that of the LIA group (p<0.001). Preoperative systolic and diastolic blood pressures (SBP and DBP) were higher in the LIA + MA group compared to the LIA group (p<0.001,<0.001, respectively). Postoperative heart rate and DBP were lower in the LIA + MA group (p<0.001, 0.004, respectively). The LIA + MA group exhibited greater changes in heart rate, SBP, and DBP during and after surgery compared to the LIA group (p = 0.009, <0.001,<0.001, respectively). In terms of immediate postoperative complications, the proportion of patients requiring analgesics within 24 h post-surgery was significantly lower in the LIA + MA group (p = 0.031). Conclusion Open surgery for PDC placement under LIA + MAC is both safe and effective.