Cost and outcomes of side-to-side versus end-to-end anastomosis in right colectomy: a retrospective cohort study

被引:0
|
作者
Herzog, Kim [1 ]
Taha-Mehlitz, Stephanie [1 ]
Denhaerynck, Kris [2 ]
Steinemann, Daniel C. [1 ,3 ]
Guenin, Marc-Olivier [1 ]
Torney, Marco von Strauss Und [1 ]
机构
[1] Clarunis Univ Digest Hlth Care Ctr Basel, Basel, Switzerland
[2] Univ Basel, Dept Publ Hlth, Basel, Switzerland
[3] Clarunis Viszeralchirurg, Kleinriehenstr 30, CH-4058 Basel, Switzerland
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2025年 / 39卷 / 03期
关键词
Ileocecal anastomosis; Right colectomy; Ileocecal resection; Economy; Costs; OPEN COLORECTAL SURGERY; ENHANCED RECOVERY; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-025-11544-4
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThe optimal anastomotic configuration for right-sided colectomies remains controversial, with comparable postoperative outcomes across techniques. Thus, economic considerations may play a larger role in decision-making within cost-constrained healthcare settings. MethodsThis retrospective cohort study evaluated right-sided colectomies with ileocolic anastomosis at a Swiss tertiary center between 2016 and 2021. We compared costs and outcomes among three anastomotic techniques: end-to-end (EE), side-to-side stapled (SSS), and side-to-side hand-sewn (SSH). ResultsOut of 468 patients (mean age 67.7 +/- 16.2 years; 51.7% female), EE was used in 95 cases (20.3%), SSS in 191 (40.8%), and SSH in 182 (38.9%). The majority (72.0%) underwent elective surgery. Insurance coverage included basic (62.2%), semi-private (24.2%), and private (13.7%). Mean operation times were shortest for EE (173.6 +/- 72.3 min), followed by SSS (188.0 +/- 65.4 min) and SSH (195.1 +/- 61.5 min). The median total costs were 26,449 <euro>. The SSS group had the lowest median total costs, 2424 <euro> less than SSH and 2095 <euro> less than EE, with no significant differences (p = 0.1657). Significant differences were observed in operating room (OR) costs, with EE being the lowest and SSH the highest (p < 0.0001). Adjusted OR costs in SSH were 23% more than EE and 21% more than SSS. No significant difference was found between EE and SSS OR costs. For mean OR material costs, EE had the lowest, followed by SSS and SSH. Adjusted costs for EE were 52% lower than SSS (p = 0.0005) and 65% lower than SSH (p = 0.0191).Clavien-Dindo Grade >= III complication rates were 2.1% for EE, 1.9% for SSH, and 3.0% for SSS. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 12 cases (2.6%), and in-hospital mortality was 0.9% (no deaths in EE; two in SSS and SSH each). ResultsOut of 468 patients (mean age 67.7 +/- 16.2 years; 51.7% female), EE was used in 95 cases (20.3%), SSS in 191 (40.8%), and SSH in 182 (38.9%). The majority (72.0%) underwent elective surgery. Insurance coverage included basic (62.2%), semi-private (24.2%), and private (13.7%). Mean operation times were shortest for EE (173.6 +/- 72.3 min), followed by SSS (188.0 +/- 65.4 min) and SSH (195.1 +/- 61.5 min). The median total costs were 26,449 <euro>. The SSS group had the lowest median total costs, 2424 <euro> less than SSH and 2095 <euro> less than EE, with no significant differences (p = 0.1657). Significant differences were observed in operating room (OR) costs, with EE being the lowest and SSH the highest (p < 0.0001). Adjusted OR costs in SSH were 23% more than EE and 21% more than SSS. No significant difference was found between EE and SSS OR costs. For mean OR material costs, EE had the lowest, followed by SSS and SSH. Adjusted costs for EE were 52% lower than SSS (p = 0.0005) and 65% lower than SSH (p = 0.0191).Clavien-Dindo Grade >= III complication rates were 2.1% for EE, 1.9% for SSH, and 3.0% for SSS. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 12 cases (2.6%), and in-hospital mortality was 0.9% (no deaths in EE; two in SSS and SSH each). ConclusionsEE anastomosis was associated with the lowest OR and material costs in this retrospective analysis while no disadvantages concerning postoperative outcomes could be identified.
引用
收藏
页码:1915 / 1923
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Side-to-side versus end-to-side ileocolic anastomosis in right-sided colectomies: A cohort control study
    Lin, Snow Yunni
    Liang Buan, Bryan Jun Liang
    Sim, Wilson
    Jain, Sneha Rajiv
    Ying Chang, Heidi Sian Ying
    Lee, Kuok Chung
    Chong, Choon Seng
    JOURNAL OF MINIMAL ACCESS SURGERY, 2022, 18 (03) : 408 - +
  • [2] End-to-end versus side-to-end anastomosis after bowel resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis: A retrospective study
    Pontrelli, Giovanni
    Huscher, Cristiano
    Scioscia, Marco
    Brusca, Federica
    Tedeschi, Umberto
    Greco, Pantaleo
    Mancarella, Matteo
    Biglia, Nicoletta
    Novara, Lorenzo
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2022, 51 (10)
  • [3] Objective recovery time with end-to-side versus side-to-side anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer: a randomized controlled trial
    Kim, Min Hyun
    Kang, Sung Il
    Cho, Jung Rae
    Lee, Jeehye
    Yang, In Jun
    Suh, Jung Wook
    Oh, Heung-Kwon
    Kim, Duck-Woo
    Kang, Sung-Bum
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 36 (04): : 2499 - 2506
  • [4] "How I Do It" - Radical Right Colectomy with Side-to-Side Stapled Ileo-Colonic Anastomosis
    Huebner, M.
    Larson, D. W.
    Wolff, B. G.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2012, 16 (08) : 1605 - 1609
  • [5] Stapled Side-to-Side Anastomosis Might Be Better Than Handsewn End-to-End Anastomosis in Ileocolic Resection for Crohn's Disease: A Meta-Analysis
    He, Xiaosheng
    Chen, Zexian
    Huang, Juanni
    Lian, Lei
    Rouniyar, Santosh
    Wu, Xiaojian
    Lan, Ping
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2014, 59 (07) : 1544 - 1551
  • [6] Stapled Side-to-Side Anastomosis Might Be Better Than Handsewn End-to-End Anastomosis in Ileocolic Resection for Crohn’s Disease: A Meta-Analysis
    Xiaosheng He
    Zexian Chen
    Juanni Huang
    Lei Lian
    Santosh Rouniyar
    Xiaojian Wu
    Ping Lan
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2014, 59 : 1544 - 1551
  • [7] Ileocolonic anastomosis after right hemicolectomy for colon cancer: functional end-to-end or end-to-side?
    Liu, Zheng
    Wang, Guiyu
    Yang, Ming
    Chen, Yinggang
    Miao, Dazhuang
    Muhammad, Shan
    Wang, Xishan
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 12
  • [8] “How I Do It”—Radical Right Colectomy with Side-to-Side Stapled Ileo-Colonic Anastomosis
    M. Hübner
    D. W. Larson
    B. G. Wolff
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2012, 16 : 1605 - 1609
  • [9] End-to-End Versus End-to-Side Esophagogastrostomy After Esophageal Cancer Resection A Prospective Randomized Study
    Nederlof, Nina
    Tilanus, Hugo W.
    Tran, T. C. Khe
    Hop, Wim C. J.
    Wijnhoven, Bas P. L.
    de Jonge, Jeroen
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2011, 254 (02) : 226 - 233
  • [10] Complications after end-to-end vs. side-to-side anastomosis in ileocecal Crohn's disease-early postoperative results from a randomized controlled multi-center trial (ISRCTN-45665492)
    Zurbuchen, Urte
    Kroesen, Anton J.
    Knebel, Philipp
    Betzler, Michael-Hans
    Becker, Heinz
    Bruch, Hans-Peter
    Senninger, Norbert
    Post, Stefan
    Buhr, Heinz J.
    Ritz, Joerg-Peter
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2013, 398 (03) : 467 - 474