Evaluation of Secondary Reinforcement Layers on Segmental MSE Wall Behavior Using 3D Finite Element Method: A Case Study

被引:0
|
作者
Irawan, Albert Daniel [1 ]
Lim, Aswin [1 ]
Wijaya, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Katolik Parahyangan, Dept Civil Engn, Bandung 40141, Indonesia
关键词
MSESW; Primary reinforcement; Secondary reinforcement; Finite element method; Wall deflections; Tensile loads; DATA-BASE; RECOMMENDATIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s40891-025-00615-0
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Mechanically Stabilized Earth Segmental Wall (MSESW) is a composite retaining structure consisting of cruciform panel facing, geosynthetic strips, and granular backfill which is extensively utilized in various infrastructure projects. MSESW's typical vertical spacing between primary reinforcement is 0.75 m, which is a notably significant distance that may result in the wall bulging. The implementation of the secondary reinforcement, GeoGrid, is positioned in the gaps between such spacings. This research focuses on how secondary reinforcement affects the behavior of the MSESW. MSESW behavior can be observed through the back analysis of the field monitoring data collected with a total station. 2D and 3D Finite Element Method, which generates the most realistic models, is used to perform the back analysis. The most practically ideal model is the gap between panels that are installed with bearing pads. Parametric studies are also conducted by varying the secondary and primary reinforcement properties, i.e., type, length, and ultimate tensile strength. Secondary reinforcement improves the MSESW's behavior significantly, in terms of wall deflections, tensile loads, and reinforcement deformations. The optimum length for applying secondary reinforcement is 0.5 of the primary reinforcement's length. Secondary reinforcement primarily enhances internal stability, i.e., rupture, pull-out, and connection failure, but not compound failure. For MSESW, Biaxial GeoGrid use is not advantageous. Applying tensile loads at the connection of facing and reinforcement is mandatory, as per many international standards, i.e., American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Canadian Standards Association (CSA), Association Fran & ccedil;aise de Normalisation (AFNOR), and British Standards Institution (BSI).
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Analysis of surface deformation patterns using 3D finite element method:: A case study in the Skane area, Sweden
    Kiamehr, R
    Sjöberg, LE
    JOURNAL OF GEODYNAMICS, 2005, 39 (04) : 403 - 412
  • [2] A 3D finite element ALE method using an approximate Riemann solution
    Chiravalle, V. P.
    Morgan, N. R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN FLUIDS, 2017, 83 (08) : 642 - 663
  • [3] Residual strains in the arterial wall: A 3D finite element model
    He, Fan
    Li, Xiao-Yang
    COMMUNICATIONS IN NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2008, 24 (11): : 1325 - 1337
  • [4] 3D Finite Element Analysis of a Concrete Dam Behavior under Changing Hydrostatic Load: A Case Study
    Zvanut, Pavel
    MATERIALS, 2022, 15 (03)
  • [5] Comparison between 2d and 3d behavior of sheet piles by finite element method
    Jesmani, Mehrab
    Mehdipour, Iman
    Ajami, Azade
    KUWAIT JOURNAL OF SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2011, 38 (2B): : 1 - 16
  • [6] Investigation of flexural behavior of 3D textile reinforced concrete using both experimental tests and finite element method
    Abdellahi, Sayyed Behzad
    Hejazi, Sayyed Mahdi
    Hasani, Hossein
    JOURNAL OF SANDWICH STRUCTURES & MATERIALS, 2018, 20 (05) : 578 - 594
  • [7] Abfraction: 3D analysis by means of the finite element method
    Geramy, A
    Sharafoddin, F
    QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 34 (07): : 526 - 533
  • [8] 3D modeling of arbitrary cracking in solids using augmented finite element method
    Naderi, M.
    Iyyer, N.
    COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2017, 160 : 220 - 231
  • [9] Investigation of Electrical characteristics of Dielectric fluids using 3D Finite Element Method
    Vigneshwaran, B.
    Saravanan, J.
    Gopinath, S.
    Iruthayarajan, M. Willjuice
    2018 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL ENERGY SYSTEMS (ICEES), 2018, : 552 - 556
  • [10] Direct Current Simulation in Acrylic Box Using 3D Finite Element Method
    Laksono, Y. A.
    Zulaikah, S.
    Sunaryo, S.
    Heriyanto, H.
    Hidayat, S.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON CURRENT PROGRESS IN MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCES (ISCPMS2018), 2019, 2168