Real-world data of perioperative complications in prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: a prospective cohort study

被引:1
作者
Hamann, Moritz [1 ]
Bensmann, Elena [1 ]
Andrulat, Anne [1 ]
Festl, Jasmin [1 ]
Saadat, Gitti [1 ]
Klein, Evelyn [2 ]
Chronas, Dimitrios [3 ]
Braun, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Red Cross Hosp, Breast Ctr, Dept Gynecol, Taxisstr 3, D-80637 Munich, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Munich, Germany
[3] Spital Zollikerberg, Dept Gynecol, Zollikerberg, Switzerland
关键词
TiLOOP (R) Bra Pocket; Breast reconstruction; Breast cancer; Implant loss; Complications; Breast surgery; NIPPLE-SPARING MASTECTOMY; ACELLULAR DERMAL MATRIX; TILOOP(R) BRA POCKET; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; FOLLOW-UP; OUTCOMES; MESH; DETERMINANTS; CONSERVATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00404-024-07807-5
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
PurposeTo analyze complications and potential risk factors associated with immediate prepectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction (DTIBR). Methods295 patients (326 operated breasts) with DTIBR between March 2021 and December 2023 were included in this prospective study. Postoperative complications (postoperative bleeding, seroma, infection, necrosis, wound dehiscence, implant exchange/loss) were analyzed for potential risk factors by descriptive and logistic regression analyses. ResultsThe implant was covered by TiLOOP (R) Bra Pocket in 227 breasts (69.6%), by "dual-plane" technique in 20 breasts (6.1%), by acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in 1 breast (0.3%). No additional support was used for 78 breasts (23.9%). The use of mesh did not increase the risk for complications. Major complications requiring surgical revision occurred due to postoperative bleeding in 22 (6.7%), seroma in 2 (0.6%), infection in 13 (4.0%), necrosis in 10 (3.1%), and wound dehiscence in 10 (3.1%) breasts. Thirteen (4.0%) implants were exchanged, and 5 (1.5%) were explanted without substitution. One patient had to switch to autologous reconstruction due to skin necrosis. The main reasons for the removal/exchange of implants were infections (11 breasts, 3.4%) and necrosis (4 breasts, 1.2%). The risk for necrosis, infection, and wound dehiscence was mainly associated with the type of incision, especially skin-reducing incisions, and body mass index (BMI) >= 30 kg/m2. ConclusionSevere complications occurred primarily in patients with a BMI >= 30 kg/m2 and when skin-reducing surgical techniques were performed. Trial RegistryThis study was retrospectively registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) on 20.06.2024. DRKS-ID: DRKS00034493. https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00034493.
引用
收藏
页码:3077 / 3089
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Nipple-areolar complex ischemia and necrosis in nipple-sparing mastectomy [J].
Ahn, Sung Jae ;
Woo, Tae Yong ;
Lee, Dong Won ;
Lew, Dae Hyun ;
Song, Seung Yong .
EJSO, 2018, 44 (08) :1170-1176
[2]   Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast conserving surgery, simple mastectomy and breast reconstruction [J].
Al-Ghazal, SK ;
Fallowfield, L ;
Blamey, RW .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2000, 36 (15) :1938-1943
[3]   Determinants of patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction [J].
Alderman, AK ;
Wilkins, EG ;
Lowery, JC ;
Kim, M ;
Davis, JA .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2000, 106 (04) :769-776
[4]   Complications in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: Two-year results of the Michigan breast reconstruction outcome study [J].
Alderman, AK ;
Wilkins, EG ;
Kim, HM ;
Lowery, JC .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2002, 109 (07) :2265-2274
[5]   Clinical determinants of patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction [J].
Andrade, WN ;
Baxter, N ;
Semple, JL .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2001, 107 (01) :46-54
[6]   Prospective analysis of long-term psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction - Two-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Study [J].
Atisha, Dunya ;
Alderman, Amy K. ;
Lowery, Julie C. ;
Kuhn, Latoya E. ;
Davis, Jenny ;
Wilkins, Edwin G. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2008, 247 (06) :1019-1028
[7]   Infections following Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Case-Control Study over 11 Years [J].
Banuelos, Joseph ;
Sabbagh, M. Diya ;
Roh, Si-Gyun ;
Nguyen, Minh-Doan T. ;
Lemaine, Valerie ;
Tran, Nho, V ;
Jacobson, Steven R. ;
Boughey, Judy C. ;
Jakub, James W. ;
Hieken, Tina J. ;
Degnim, Amy C. ;
Mandrekar, Jay ;
Berbari, Elie ;
Sharaf, Basel .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 144 (06) :1270-1277
[8]   Subcutaneous Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Surgical, Functional, and Aesthetic Results after Long-Term Follow-Up [J].
Bernini, Marco ;
Calabrese, Claudio ;
Cecconi, Lorenzo ;
Santi, Caterina ;
Gjondedaj, Ulpjana ;
Roselli, Jenny ;
Nori, Jacopo ;
Fausto, Alfonso ;
Orzalesi, Lorenzo .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2015, 3 (12)
[9]   Evaluation of Prepectoral Implant Placement and Complete Coverage with TiLoop Bra Mesh for Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective Study on Long-Term and Patient-Reported BREAST-Q Outcomes [J].
Casella, Donato ;
Di Taranto, Giuseppe ;
Marcasciano, Marco ;
Sordi, Silvia ;
Kothari, Ashutosh ;
Kovacs, Tibor ;
Lo Torto, Federico ;
Cigna, Emanuele ;
Calabrese, Claudio ;
Ribuffo, Diego .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 143 (01) :1E-9E
[10]   Inframammary versus Periareolar Incision: A Comparison of Early Complications in Nipple-sparing Mastectomy [J].
Cavalcante, Francisco P. ;
Lima, Ticiane O. ;
Alcantara, Ryane ;
Cardoso, Amanda ;
Ulisses, Flora ;
Novita, Guilherme ;
Zerwes, Felipe ;
Millen, Eduardo .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2023, 11 (11) :E5367