Real-world data of perioperative complications in prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: a prospective cohort study

被引:0
|
作者
Hamann, Moritz [1 ]
Bensmann, Elena [1 ]
Andrulat, Anne [1 ]
Festl, Jasmin [1 ]
Saadat, Gitti [1 ]
Klein, Evelyn [2 ]
Chronas, Dimitrios [3 ]
Braun, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Red Cross Hosp, Breast Ctr, Dept Gynecol, Taxisstr 3, D-80637 Munich, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Munich, Germany
[3] Spital Zollikerberg, Dept Gynecol, Zollikerberg, Switzerland
关键词
TiLOOP (R) Bra Pocket; Breast reconstruction; Breast cancer; Implant loss; Complications; Breast surgery; NIPPLE-SPARING MASTECTOMY; ACELLULAR DERMAL MATRIX; TILOOP(R) BRA POCKET; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; FOLLOW-UP; OUTCOMES; MESH; DETERMINANTS; CONSERVATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00404-024-07807-5
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
PurposeTo analyze complications and potential risk factors associated with immediate prepectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction (DTIBR). Methods295 patients (326 operated breasts) with DTIBR between March 2021 and December 2023 were included in this prospective study. Postoperative complications (postoperative bleeding, seroma, infection, necrosis, wound dehiscence, implant exchange/loss) were analyzed for potential risk factors by descriptive and logistic regression analyses. ResultsThe implant was covered by TiLOOP (R) Bra Pocket in 227 breasts (69.6%), by "dual-plane" technique in 20 breasts (6.1%), by acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in 1 breast (0.3%). No additional support was used for 78 breasts (23.9%). The use of mesh did not increase the risk for complications. Major complications requiring surgical revision occurred due to postoperative bleeding in 22 (6.7%), seroma in 2 (0.6%), infection in 13 (4.0%), necrosis in 10 (3.1%), and wound dehiscence in 10 (3.1%) breasts. Thirteen (4.0%) implants were exchanged, and 5 (1.5%) were explanted without substitution. One patient had to switch to autologous reconstruction due to skin necrosis. The main reasons for the removal/exchange of implants were infections (11 breasts, 3.4%) and necrosis (4 breasts, 1.2%). The risk for necrosis, infection, and wound dehiscence was mainly associated with the type of incision, especially skin-reducing incisions, and body mass index (BMI) >= 30 kg/m2. ConclusionSevere complications occurred primarily in patients with a BMI >= 30 kg/m2 and when skin-reducing surgical techniques were performed. Trial RegistryThis study was retrospectively registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) on 20.06.2024. DRKS-ID: DRKS00034493. https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00034493.
引用
收藏
页码:3077 / 3089
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Guide to Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A New Dimension to Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
    Vidya, Raghavan
    Iqbal, Fahad Mujtaba
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2017, 17 (04) : 266 - 271
  • [2] Hybrid Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Surgical Approach that Combines the Benefits of Autologous and Implant-Based Reconstruction
    Momeni, Arash
    Kanchwala, Suhail
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 142 (05) : 1109 - 1115
  • [3] Risk factors for complications and implant loss after prepectoral implant-based immediate breast reconstruction: medium-term outcomes in a prospective cohort
    Dave, R. V.
    Vucicevic, A.
    Barrett, E.
    Highton, L.
    Johnson, R.
    Kirwan, C. C.
    Harvey, J. R.
    Murphy, J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108 (05) : 534 - 541
  • [4] Impact of Radiation on Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction in Prepectoral Versus Submuscular Planes
    Thuman, Jenna M.
    Worbowtiz, Nestor
    Jain, Abishek
    Ulm, Jason P.
    Delaney, Kevin O.
    Herrera, Fernando A.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2021, 86 (6S) : S560 - S566
  • [5] Understanding the Evidence and Improving Outcomes with Implant-Based Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction
    Campbell, Chris A.
    Losken, Albert
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 148 (03) : 437E - 450E
  • [6] The Failed Breast Implant in Postmastectomy Reconstruction A Systematic Literature Review of Complications of Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
    Bucher, Florian
    Vogt, Peter M.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2022, 88 (06) : 695 - 703
  • [7] Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using Meshed ADM
    Fin, Alessandra
    De Biasio, Fabrizio
    Mura, Sebastiano
    Massarut, Samuele
    Zaccaria, Giovanna
    Parodi, Pier Camillo
    PLASTIC SURGERY, 2021, 29 (02) : 81 - 87
  • [8] Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy
    Elswick, Sarah M.
    Harless, Christin A.
    Bishop, Sarah N.
    Schleck, Cathy D.
    Mandrekar, Jay
    Reusche, Ryan D.
    Mutter, Robert W.
    Boughey, Judy C.
    Jacobson, Steven R.
    Lemaine, Valerie
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 142 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [9] Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction A Meta-analysis
    Li, Yunzhu
    Xu, Gang
    Yu, Nanze
    Huang, Jiuzuo
    Long, Xiao
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2020, 85 (04) : 437 - 447
  • [10] Investigating the Severity of Complications following Mastectomy and Prepectoral Implant-Based versus Autologous Reconstruction
    Pedreira, Rachel
    Tevlin, Ruth
    Griffin, Michelle
    Wan, Derrick
    Momeni, Arash
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2023, 151 (02) : 200E - 206E