Diagnostic value of [18F]FDG PET/MRI in the detection of lymph node metastasis of cervical cancer: a meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Tian, Tian [1 ]
Ren, Jiali [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent Hosp Enshi Tujia & Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Enshi, Peoples R China
关键词
Cervical cancer; Lymph node metastasis; F-18]FDG PET/MRI; Meta-analysis; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; PROGNOSTIC VALUE; PET-MRI; CARCINOMA; PERFORMANCE; CT;
D O I
10.1007/s40336-024-00661-0
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the diagnostic potential and application value of F-18 fludeoxyglucose ( [F-18]FDG) positron emission tomography/ magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) for lymph node metastasis detection in cervical cancer. Methods We searched in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase database for relevant articles with search dates from 1998 to December 2023. All articles on ( [F-18]FDG PET/MRI for diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in cervical cancer were extracted and further evaluated. The combined sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, and ROC curve of ( [F-18]FDG PET/MRI were calculated to assess its diagnostic capability. Results 7 studies that satisfied the criteria were eventually included, including 481 patients. The combined sensitivity of ( [F-18]FDG PET/MRI for detecting lymph node metastasis of cervical cancer was 0.85 (0.67-0.94), and the combined specificity was 0.94 (0.90-0.97). The AUC (Area Under Curve) value was 0.96 (0.93-0.97). The PLR (Positive Likelihood Ratio), and NLR (Negative Likelihood Ratio) were 14.32 (8.44-24.31) and 0.16 (0.06-0.38), respectively. When the pre-test likelihood was set at 50%, the post-test likelihood rose to 93%. Conclusions ( [F-18]FDG PET/MRI showed promising clinical utility and diagnostic value in evaluating lymph node staging in cervical cancer, and demonstrated relatively high sensitivity and specificity. However, to draw stronger evidence-based conclusions, large-scale clinical trials should be conducted to provide stronger and more reliable support for its clinical application.
引用
收藏
页码:827 / 836
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Does blinding of readers affect the results of meta-analyses?
    Berlin, JA
    [J]. LANCET, 1997, 350 (9072) : 185 - 186
  • [2] Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri
    Bhatla, Neerja
    Berek, Jonathan S.
    Cuello Fredes, Mauricio
    Denny, Lynette A.
    Grenman, Seija
    Karunaratne, Kanishka
    Kehoe, Sean T.
    Konishi, Ikuo
    Olawaiye, Alexander B.
    Prat, Jaime
    Sankaranarayanan, Rengaswamy
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2019, 145 (01) : 129 - 135
  • [3] Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: a systematic review
    Bipat, S
    Glas, AS
    van der Velden, J
    Zwinderman, AH
    Bossuyt, PMM
    Stoker, J
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2003, 91 (01) : 59 - 66
  • [4] High Diagnostic Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Endometrial Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature
    Bollineni, Vikram Rao
    Ytre-Hauge, Sigmund
    Bollineni-Balabay, Oksana
    Salvesen, Helga Birgitte
    Haldorsen, Ingfrid Salvesen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2016, 57 (06) : 879 - 885
  • [5] Incremental prognostic value of MRI in the staging of early cervical cancer: a prospective study and review of the literature
    Bourgioti, Charis
    Chatoupis, Konstantinos
    Rodolakis, Alexandros
    Antoniou, Aristeidis
    Tzavara, Chara
    Koutoulidis, Vassilis
    Moulopoulos, Lia Angela
    [J]. CLINICAL IMAGING, 2016, 40 (01) : 72 - 78
  • [6] MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGING IN CERVICAL-CANCER - A BASIS FOR OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATION
    BURGHARDT, E
    HOFMANN, HMW
    EBNER, F
    HAAS, J
    TAMUSSINO, K
    JUSTICH, E
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1989, 33 (01) : 61 - 67
  • [7] Comparison of the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the presurgical detection of lymph node metastases in patients with uterine cervical carcinoma - A prospective study
    Choi, HJ
    Roh, JW
    Seo, SS
    Lee, S
    Kim, JY
    Kim, SK
    Kang, KW
    Lee, JS
    Jeong, JY
    Park, SY
    [J]. CANCER, 2006, 106 (04) : 914 - 922
  • [8] Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Delgado-Rodriguez, M.
    Sillero-Arenas, M.
    [J]. MEDICINA INTENSIVA, 2018, 42 (07) : 444 - 453
  • [9] Gadducci A, 2003, EUR J GYNAECOL ONCOL, V24, P513
  • [10] Gong J, 2021, J INT MED RES, V49