Outcomes after revisional surgery for paraesophageal hernias at a high-volume tertiary care center

被引:0
|
作者
Kammili, Anitha [1 ]
Trepanier, Maude [2 ]
Cools-Lartigue, Jonathan [1 ]
Ferri, Lorenzo E. [1 ]
Mueller, Carmen L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Surg, Div Thorac & Upper Gastrointestinal Surg, Hlth Ctr, L8 505-1650 Cedar Ave, Montreal, PQ H3G 1A4, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Dept Surg, Div Gen Surg, Hlth Ctr, L8 505-1650 Cedar Ave, Montreal, PQ H3G 1A4, Canada
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2024年 / 38卷 / 12期
关键词
Fundoplication; Paraesophageal hernia; Reoperation; Revision; Outcomes; LAPAROSCOPIC REPAIR;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-024-11325-5
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Although recurrences after repair of giant paraesophageal hernias (PEH) are common, revisional procedures are challenging and associated with higher complication rates than primary repair. Therefore, repair of recurrent PEH is often avoided except in symptomatic patients. Data describing operative outcomes in these infrequent cases is lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to report and compare peri-operative outcomes of revisional PEH repair to similar patients undergoing primary surgery. Methods A single-institution, retrospective cohort study was conducted on all adult patients undergoing primary repair of Type II-IV PEH and any revisional surgery for recurrent hiatal hernia after previous primary PEH repair (2012-2019). Patient and operative characteristics and post-operative outcomes were extracted from medical records. Patients were grouped into revisional (rPEH) and primary repair (pPEH). Coarsened exact matching was performed to create balanced cohorts. Results A total of 347 cases were identified. The matched cohort included 234 patients (rPEH: 46, pPEH: 188). Patient sex and comorbidities were well balanced, while those who underwent revisions were younger (6413 vs. 69 +/- 11 years; p=0.01). Median time between primary and rPEH was 40[17-121] months. Incidence of emergency repair were similar among groups (rPEH: 9(15%), pPEH: 14(8%); p=0.10). All revisional cases commenced laparoscopically with 7(15%) requiring conversion to open. The conversion rate was higher for rPEH than primary surgery (7(15%) vs. 3(2%); p<0.01), with the most common reasons being adhesions and gastric fundus injury. Intra-operative complications occurred in 12(26%) revisional cases, of which 58% were gastric fundus injuries. Median length of stay was longer for rPEH than pPEH (2[1-5] vs. 1[1-2] day; p=0.02). Incidence of severe complications (rPEH: 5(11%), pPEH: 11(6%); p=0.23) and reoperations (rPEH: 2(4%), pPEH: 7(4%); p=0.84) were similar between groups. There were no peri-operative deaths. Conclusion In a high-volume tertiary care center, repair of recurrent giant paraesophageal hernias can be performed successfully laparoscopically in the majority of cases with acceptable morbidity and peri-operative outcomes in comparison to primary surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:7361 / 7365
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] REVISIONAL BARIATRIC SURGERY: EXPERIENCE OF A HIGH-VOLUME CENTER
    Francisco Zavalza, Juan
    Giron, Felipe
    Cantos, Ivan
    Prats, Pedro J.
    Molinarez, Manuel
    Toledo, Manuel
    Alvarez, Tatiana
    Paipilla, Omar
    Daye Rodriguez, Maria
    Zundel, Natan
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2023, 33 : 857 - 857
  • [2] Robotic Revisional Bariatric Surgery: a High-Volume Center Experience
    Dreifuss, Nicolas H.
    Mangano, Alberto
    Hassan, Chandra
    Masrur, Mario A.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2021, 31 (04) : 1656 - 1663
  • [3] Robotic Revisional Bariatric Surgery: a High-Volume Center Experience
    Nicolas H. Dreifuss
    Alberto Mangano
    Chandra Hassan
    Mario A. Masrur
    Obesity Surgery, 2021, 31 : 1656 - 1663
  • [4] Revisional surgery after restrictive surgery: midterm outcomes of a tertiary center
    Gelly, Gautier
    Meunier, Hugo
    Bion, Adrien Lee
    Zamparini, Marion
    Fiant, Anne-Lise
    Savey, Veronique
    Alves, Arnaud
    Menahem, Benjamin
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (10): : 7686 - 7697
  • [5] Revisional surgery after restrictive surgery: midterm outcomes of a tertiary center
    Gautier Gelly
    Hugo Meunier
    Adrien Lee Bion
    Marion Zamparini
    Anne-Lise Fiant
    Véronique Savey
    Arnaud Alves
    Benjamin Menahem
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2023, 37 : 7686 - 7697
  • [6] Experience of Robotic Complex Revisional Bariatric Surgery in a High-Volume Center
    Castillo-Larios, Rocio
    Cornejo, Jorge
    Gunturu, Naga Swati
    Cheng, Yilon Lima
    Elli, Enrique F.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2023, 33 (12) : 4034 - 4041
  • [7] Experience of Robotic Complex Revisional Bariatric Surgery in a High-Volume Center
    Rocio Castillo-Larios
    Jorge Cornejo
    Naga Swati Gunturu
    Yilon Lima Cheng
    Enrique F. Elli
    Obesity Surgery, 2023, 33 : 4034 - 4041
  • [8] Outcomes in revisional bariatric surgery: a high-volume single institution experience
    Cheema, Fareed
    Choi, Michael
    Moran-Atkin, Erin
    Camacho, Diego
    Choi, Jenny
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2021, 35 (07): : 3932 - 3939
  • [9] Outcomes in revisional bariatric surgery: a high-volume single institution experience
    Fareed Cheema
    Michael Choi
    Erin Moran-Atkin
    Diego Camacho
    Jenny Choi
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2021, 35 : 3932 - 3939
  • [10] Minimally Invasive Revisional Bariatric Surgery in a MBSAQIP Accredited High-Volume Center
    Xie, Julia
    Dreifuss, Nicolas H.
    Schlottmann, Francisco
    Cubisino, Antonio
    Mangano, Alberto
    Vanetta, Carolina
    Baz, Carolina
    Valle, Valentina
    Bianco, Francesco M.
    Gangemi, Antonio
    Masrur, Mario A.
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9