A decision-making model for blasting risk assessment in mines using FBWM and GRA methods

被引:0
|
作者
Soltani, Edris [1 ]
Ahmadi, Omran [1 ]
Rashnoudi, Payam [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Fac Med Sci, Dept Occupat Hlth & Safety Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Abadan Univ Med Sci, Dept Occupat Hlth & Safety Engn, Abadan, Iran
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2024年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
Risk assessment; Blasting; GRA method; FBWM method; Fuzzy sets;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-024-82181-5
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Due to the extensive use of explosives, the failure to identify hazards and assess risks in blasting may lead to catastrophic consequences. However, classical risk assessment approaches are limited in their ability to address ambiguity and uncertainty, as well as in assigning weights to the criteria involved in the risk assessment process. This study employs a multi-criteria decision-making system to address these limitations and assess the risks associated with blasting. The proposed model integrates Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) to prioritize risks and the Fuzzy Best-Worst Method (FBWM) to assign weights to the criteria critical to the risk assessment process. The findings indicated that "not using personal anti-static protection devices during blasting (R12)", "placing the explosive fuse near explosive materials (R15)", and "bringing explosive materials to the explosion site before completing drilling and blasting operations (R23)" were the most significant blasting risks, respectively. These risks stem from operational processes, human factors, and the working environment, thus requiring special attention. The weighting of the study criteria, including Consequence (C), Probability (P), and Exposure (E), revealed that the C criterion, with a final weight of 0.538, was the most influential in the risk assessment process. The P and E criteria, with weights of 0.294 and 0.167, respectively, ranked second and third in importance among the assessment criteria. To ensure the applicability and accuracy of the proposed method, a validation study comprising two distinct parts-sensitivity analysis and comparative analysis-was conducted. The results of these evaluations highlighted the appropriate and reliable performance of the proposed approach. This approach can assist decision-makers, managers, and risk analysts in more accurately identifying and assessing risks by addressing some of the limitations inherent in classical risk assessment methods.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An Interruptible Load Risk Decision-Making Model Considering the Advanced Notification Time
    Li, Dezhi
    Yan, Huaguang
    Chen, Songsong
    Lang, Yizihe
    Gao, Ciwei
    2017 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS AND INFORMATICS (ICSAI), 2017, : 318 - 323
  • [42] Storm surge risk assessment and sensitivity analysis based on multiple criteria decision-making methods: a case study of Huizhou City
    Wei, Wei
    Huang, Shining
    Qin, Hao
    Yu, Lichen
    Mu, Lin
    FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2024, 11
  • [43] Dynamic human error risk assessment of group decision-making in extreme cooperative scenario
    Qiao, Yidan
    Gao, Xinwei
    Ma, Lin
    Chen, Dengkai
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2024, 249
  • [44] Intelligent decision-making with bird-strike risk assessment for airport bird repellent
    Chen, Weishi
    Zhang, Jie
    Li, Jing
    AERONAUTICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 122 (1252): : 988 - 1002
  • [45] RISK ASSESSMENT FOR PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY IN UNCERTAIN ENVIRONMENT: AN INTEGRATED MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING APPROACH
    Sharma A.
    Kumar D.
    Arora N.
    Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 2023, 6 (02): : 293 - 340
  • [46] Trends in the Evolution of Floodplain Management in Australia: Risk Assessment, Precautionary and Robust Decision-Making
    England, Philippa
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAW, 2019, 31 (02) : 315 - 341
  • [47] Machine Learning-Based Decision-Making Mechanism for Risk Assessment of Cardiovascular Disease
    Wang, Cheng
    Zhu, Haoran
    Rao, Congjun
    CMES-COMPUTER MODELING IN ENGINEERING & SCIENCES, 2024, 138 (01): : 691 - 718
  • [48] The Role of Scenario-Building in Risk Assessment and Decision-Making on Urban Water Reuse
    Ribeiro, Rita
    Rosa, Maria Joao
    WATER, 2024, 16 (18)
  • [49] Formalizing an integrated decision-making model for the risk assessment of carbon capture, utilization, and storage projects: From a sustainability perspective
    Liu, Bingsheng
    Liu, Song
    Xue, Bin
    Lu, Shijian
    Yang, Yang
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2021, 303
  • [50] Flood vulnerability assessment using an integrated approach of multi-criteria decision-making model and geospatial techniques
    Vignesh, K. S.
    Anandakumar, I
    Ranjan, Rajeev
    Borah, Debashree
    MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 7 (02) : 767 - 781