A decision-making model for blasting risk assessment in mines using FBWM and GRA methods

被引:0
|
作者
Soltani, Edris [1 ]
Ahmadi, Omran [1 ]
Rashnoudi, Payam [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Fac Med Sci, Dept Occupat Hlth & Safety Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Abadan Univ Med Sci, Dept Occupat Hlth & Safety Engn, Abadan, Iran
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2024年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
Risk assessment; Blasting; GRA method; FBWM method; Fuzzy sets;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-024-82181-5
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Due to the extensive use of explosives, the failure to identify hazards and assess risks in blasting may lead to catastrophic consequences. However, classical risk assessment approaches are limited in their ability to address ambiguity and uncertainty, as well as in assigning weights to the criteria involved in the risk assessment process. This study employs a multi-criteria decision-making system to address these limitations and assess the risks associated with blasting. The proposed model integrates Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) to prioritize risks and the Fuzzy Best-Worst Method (FBWM) to assign weights to the criteria critical to the risk assessment process. The findings indicated that "not using personal anti-static protection devices during blasting (R12)", "placing the explosive fuse near explosive materials (R15)", and "bringing explosive materials to the explosion site before completing drilling and blasting operations (R23)" were the most significant blasting risks, respectively. These risks stem from operational processes, human factors, and the working environment, thus requiring special attention. The weighting of the study criteria, including Consequence (C), Probability (P), and Exposure (E), revealed that the C criterion, with a final weight of 0.538, was the most influential in the risk assessment process. The P and E criteria, with weights of 0.294 and 0.167, respectively, ranked second and third in importance among the assessment criteria. To ensure the applicability and accuracy of the proposed method, a validation study comprising two distinct parts-sensitivity analysis and comparative analysis-was conducted. The results of these evaluations highlighted the appropriate and reliable performance of the proposed approach. This approach can assist decision-makers, managers, and risk analysts in more accurately identifying and assessing risks by addressing some of the limitations inherent in classical risk assessment methods.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Emerging methods and tools for environmental risk assessment, decision-making, and policy for nanomaterials: summary of NATO Advanced Research Workshop
    Igor Linkov
    Jeffery Steevens
    Gitanjali Adlakha-Hutcheon
    Erin Bennett
    Mark Chappell
    Vicki Colvin
    J. Michael Davis
    Thomas Davis
    Alison Elder
    Steffen Foss Hansen
    Pertti Bert Hakkinen
    Saber M. Hussain
    Delara Karkan
    Rafi Korenstein
    Iseult Lynch
    Chris Metcalfe
    Abou Bakr Ramadan
    F. Kyle Satterstrom
    Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2009, 11 : 513 - 527
  • [32] Emerging methods and tools for environmental risk assessment, decision-making, and policy for nanomaterials: summary of NATO Advanced Research Workshop
    Linkov, Igor
    Steevens, Jeffery
    Adlakha-Hutcheon, Gitanjali
    Bennett, Erin
    Chappell, Mark
    Colvin, Vicki
    Davis, J. Michael
    Davis, Thomas
    Elder, Alison
    Foss Hansen, Steffen
    Hakkinen, Pertti Bert
    Hussain, Saber M.
    Karkan, Delara
    Korenstein, Rafi
    Lynch, Iseult
    Metcalfe, Chris
    Ramadan, Abou Bakr
    Satterstrom, F. Kyle
    JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, 2009, 11 (03) : 513 - 527
  • [33] Development of an Adapted Model for Decision-Making to Improve Reasoning and Risk Assessment in an Emergency Team: A Prospective Simulation Study
    Haeske, David
    Dorau, Wolfgang
    Heinemann, Niklas
    Stock, Jan-Philipp
    Schempf, Benjamin
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2019, 55 (07):
  • [34] Clinical Decision Making Using Ovarian Cancer Risk Assessment
    Stany, Michael P.
    Maxwell, G. Larry
    Rose, G. Scott
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (02) : 337 - 342
  • [35] Sustainability Assessment of Regional Transportation: An Innovative Fuzzy Group Decision-Making Model
    Li, Zengxian
    Liu, Aijun
    Shang, Wen-Long
    Li, Jiaxin
    Lu, Hui
    Zhang, Haoran
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2023, 24 (12) : 15959 - 15973
  • [36] Risk assessment for the integrated energy system using a hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making framework
    Xu, Fangqiu
    Gao, Kaiye
    Xiao, Bowen
    Liu, Jicheng
    Wu, Zixuan
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2022, 8 : 7892 - 7907
  • [37] Risk and Decision-Making: A Workshop for Environmental Professionals
    Wade, Michael J.
    Gettmann, Kimberly Day
    Behrsing, Tracy
    Sciullo, Eric
    Davis, Brian
    HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2014, 20 (01): : 263 - 271
  • [38] Risk based decision-making in plant design
    Piccinini, Norberto
    Demichela, Micaela
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2008, 86 (03): : 316 - 322
  • [39] Providing a framework based on decision-making methods to assess safety risk in construction projects
    Chen, T. C.
    Zahar, M.
    Voronkova, O. Y.
    Khoruzhy, V., I
    Morozov, I., V
    Esfahani, M. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 13 (01): : 8 - 17
  • [40] A Security-by-Design Decision-Making Model for Risk Management in Autonomous Vehicles
    Abdel-Basset, Mohamed
    Gamal, Abduallah
    Moustafa, Nour
    Abdel-Monem, Ahmed
    El-Saber, Nissreen
    IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 : 107657 - 107679