A decision-making model for blasting risk assessment in mines using FBWM and GRA methods

被引:0
|
作者
Soltani, Edris [1 ]
Ahmadi, Omran [1 ]
Rashnoudi, Payam [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Fac Med Sci, Dept Occupat Hlth & Safety Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Abadan Univ Med Sci, Dept Occupat Hlth & Safety Engn, Abadan, Iran
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2024年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
Risk assessment; Blasting; GRA method; FBWM method; Fuzzy sets;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-024-82181-5
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Due to the extensive use of explosives, the failure to identify hazards and assess risks in blasting may lead to catastrophic consequences. However, classical risk assessment approaches are limited in their ability to address ambiguity and uncertainty, as well as in assigning weights to the criteria involved in the risk assessment process. This study employs a multi-criteria decision-making system to address these limitations and assess the risks associated with blasting. The proposed model integrates Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) to prioritize risks and the Fuzzy Best-Worst Method (FBWM) to assign weights to the criteria critical to the risk assessment process. The findings indicated that "not using personal anti-static protection devices during blasting (R12)", "placing the explosive fuse near explosive materials (R15)", and "bringing explosive materials to the explosion site before completing drilling and blasting operations (R23)" were the most significant blasting risks, respectively. These risks stem from operational processes, human factors, and the working environment, thus requiring special attention. The weighting of the study criteria, including Consequence (C), Probability (P), and Exposure (E), revealed that the C criterion, with a final weight of 0.538, was the most influential in the risk assessment process. The P and E criteria, with weights of 0.294 and 0.167, respectively, ranked second and third in importance among the assessment criteria. To ensure the applicability and accuracy of the proposed method, a validation study comprising two distinct parts-sensitivity analysis and comparative analysis-was conducted. The results of these evaluations highlighted the appropriate and reliable performance of the proposed approach. This approach can assist decision-makers, managers, and risk analysts in more accurately identifying and assessing risks by addressing some of the limitations inherent in classical risk assessment methods.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Risk Assessment and Decision-Making under Uncertainty in Tunnel and Underground Engineering
    Xia, Yuanpu
    Xiong, Ziming
    Dong, Xin
    Lu, Hao
    ENTROPY, 2017, 19 (10):
  • [22] Decision-making and Risk Assessment of Purchasing and Selling Business for Electricity Retailers
    Wang L.
    Zhang L.
    Zhang F.
    Jin D.
    Dianli Xitong Zidonghua/Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2018, 42 (01): : 47 - 54and143
  • [23] Decision-making from a risk assessment perspective for Corporate Mergers and Acquisitions
    Lee J.
    Prékopa A.
    Computational Management Science, 2015, 12 (2) : 243 - 266
  • [24] Using risk factor statistics in decision-making: prospects and challenges
    Sobjerg, Lene Mosegaard
    Taylor, Brian J.
    Przeperski, Jaroslaw
    Horvat, Sasa
    Nouman, Hani
    Harvey, Denise
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2021, 24 (05) : 788 - 801
  • [25] Decision-Making and Planning Method for Autonomous Vehicles Based on Motivation and Risk Assessment
    Wang, Yisong
    Wang, Chunyan
    Zhao, Wanzhong
    Xu, Can
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 70 (01) : 107 - 120
  • [26] Categories of Evidence and Methods in Surgical Decision-Making
    Carmichael II, Samuel P.
    Kline, David A.
    SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2023, 103 (02) : 233 - 245
  • [27] Study on Information Processing in Risk Assessment and Decision-making of Electric Power Investment
    Chen, Guang
    2015 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (ICEEP 2015), 2015, : 4335 - 4339
  • [28] RISK ASSESSMENT AND DECISION-MAKING IN GEOLOGY-DRIVEN PROJECTS: A MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVE
    Carvalho, Annesly Anton
    Karthikeyan, K.
    Sudhahar, J. Clement
    Jesiah, Selvam
    ARCHIVES FOR TECHNICAL SCIENCES, 2024, (31): : 329 - 339
  • [29] Vehicle Assisted Driving Behavior Decision-Making Based on Dynamic Risk Assessment
    Liu, Zhongjie
    Zhao, Zhiguo
    Yu, Qin
    Qiche Gongcheng/Automotive Engineering, 2024, 46 (11): : 2005 - 2016
  • [30] Employing a Risk Assessment Tool for Shared Decision-Making in Breast Cancer Screening
    Krueger, Louisa
    CREATIVE NURSING, 2024, 30 (01) : 21 - 28