A decision-making model for blasting risk assessment in mines using FBWM and GRA methods

被引:0
|
作者
Soltani, Edris [1 ]
Ahmadi, Omran [1 ]
Rashnoudi, Payam [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Fac Med Sci, Dept Occupat Hlth & Safety Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Abadan Univ Med Sci, Dept Occupat Hlth & Safety Engn, Abadan, Iran
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2024年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
Risk assessment; Blasting; GRA method; FBWM method; Fuzzy sets;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-024-82181-5
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Due to the extensive use of explosives, the failure to identify hazards and assess risks in blasting may lead to catastrophic consequences. However, classical risk assessment approaches are limited in their ability to address ambiguity and uncertainty, as well as in assigning weights to the criteria involved in the risk assessment process. This study employs a multi-criteria decision-making system to address these limitations and assess the risks associated with blasting. The proposed model integrates Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) to prioritize risks and the Fuzzy Best-Worst Method (FBWM) to assign weights to the criteria critical to the risk assessment process. The findings indicated that "not using personal anti-static protection devices during blasting (R12)", "placing the explosive fuse near explosive materials (R15)", and "bringing explosive materials to the explosion site before completing drilling and blasting operations (R23)" were the most significant blasting risks, respectively. These risks stem from operational processes, human factors, and the working environment, thus requiring special attention. The weighting of the study criteria, including Consequence (C), Probability (P), and Exposure (E), revealed that the C criterion, with a final weight of 0.538, was the most influential in the risk assessment process. The P and E criteria, with weights of 0.294 and 0.167, respectively, ranked second and third in importance among the assessment criteria. To ensure the applicability and accuracy of the proposed method, a validation study comprising two distinct parts-sensitivity analysis and comparative analysis-was conducted. The results of these evaluations highlighted the appropriate and reliable performance of the proposed approach. This approach can assist decision-makers, managers, and risk analysts in more accurately identifying and assessing risks by addressing some of the limitations inherent in classical risk assessment methods.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] A Flood Risk Assessment Model for Companies and Criteria for Governmental Decision-Making to Minimize Hazards
    Ryu, Jieun
    Yoon, Eun Joo
    Park, Chan
    Lee, Dong Kun
    Jeon, Seong Woo
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (11)
  • [12] Food safety: Risk assessment methodology and decision-making criteria
    Brock, WJ
    Rodricks, JV
    Rulis, A
    Dellarco, VL
    Gray, GM
    Lane, RW
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY, 2003, 22 (06) : 435 - 451
  • [13] A spatio-temporal population model to support risk assessment and damage analysis for decision-making
    Ahola, Terhi
    Virrantaus, Kirsi
    Krisp, Jukka Matthias
    Hunter, Gary J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2007, 21 (08) : 935 - 953
  • [14] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model to Support Landfill Prioritization: Methane Risk Assessment
    Marceta, Una
    Vujic, Bogdana
    Srdjevic, Zorica
    Mihajlovic, Visnja
    Radosav, Dragica
    POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2021, 30 (02): : 1297 - 1306
  • [15] A review of occupational health and safety risk assessment approaches based on multi-criteria decision-making methods and their fuzzy versions
    Gul, Muhammet
    HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2018, 24 (07): : 1723 - 1760
  • [16] Risk assessment and risk decision-making process related to hazardous installation in France
    Salvi, O
    Gaston, D
    JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2004, 7 (06) : 599 - 608
  • [17] A model for assessment the effectiveness of company management for decision-making by investors
    Sizykh, Natalia
    Pokusaev, Pavel
    Sizykh, Dmitry
    2017 TENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE MANAGEMENT OF LARGE-SCALE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT (MLSD), 2017,
  • [18] Decision-Making Tool for Groundwater Level Spatial Distribution and Risk Assessment Using Geostatistics in R
    Varouchakis, Emmanouil A.
    Theodoridou, Panagiota G.
    Karatzas, George P.
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS TOXIC AND RADIOACTIVE WASTE, 2020, 24 (01)
  • [19] Research on information system assets risk assessment and defense decision-making
    Sha Fu
    Hang-jun Zhou
    Ye-zhi Xiao
    Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 2023, 14 : 1229 - 1241
  • [20] Decision-making and Risk Assessment of Purchasing and Selling Business for Electricity Retailers
    Wang L.
    Zhang L.
    Zhang F.
    Jin D.
    Dianli Xitong Zidonghua/Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2018, 42 (01): : 47 - 54and143