A decision-making model for blasting risk assessment in mines using FBWM and GRA methods

被引:0
|
作者
Soltani, Edris [1 ]
Ahmadi, Omran [1 ]
Rashnoudi, Payam [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Fac Med Sci, Dept Occupat Hlth & Safety Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Abadan Univ Med Sci, Dept Occupat Hlth & Safety Engn, Abadan, Iran
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2024年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
Risk assessment; Blasting; GRA method; FBWM method; Fuzzy sets;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-024-82181-5
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Due to the extensive use of explosives, the failure to identify hazards and assess risks in blasting may lead to catastrophic consequences. However, classical risk assessment approaches are limited in their ability to address ambiguity and uncertainty, as well as in assigning weights to the criteria involved in the risk assessment process. This study employs a multi-criteria decision-making system to address these limitations and assess the risks associated with blasting. The proposed model integrates Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) to prioritize risks and the Fuzzy Best-Worst Method (FBWM) to assign weights to the criteria critical to the risk assessment process. The findings indicated that "not using personal anti-static protection devices during blasting (R12)", "placing the explosive fuse near explosive materials (R15)", and "bringing explosive materials to the explosion site before completing drilling and blasting operations (R23)" were the most significant blasting risks, respectively. These risks stem from operational processes, human factors, and the working environment, thus requiring special attention. The weighting of the study criteria, including Consequence (C), Probability (P), and Exposure (E), revealed that the C criterion, with a final weight of 0.538, was the most influential in the risk assessment process. The P and E criteria, with weights of 0.294 and 0.167, respectively, ranked second and third in importance among the assessment criteria. To ensure the applicability and accuracy of the proposed method, a validation study comprising two distinct parts-sensitivity analysis and comparative analysis-was conducted. The results of these evaluations highlighted the appropriate and reliable performance of the proposed approach. This approach can assist decision-makers, managers, and risk analysts in more accurately identifying and assessing risks by addressing some of the limitations inherent in classical risk assessment methods.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Supporting decision-making in patient risk assessment using a hierarchical fuzzy model
    Alessandro Jatobá
    Hugo Cesar Bellas
    Isabella Koster
    Catherine M. Burns
    Mario Cesar R. Vidal
    Cláudio Henrique S. Grecco
    Paulo Victor R. de Carvalho
    Cognition, Technology & Work, 2018, 20 : 477 - 488
  • [2] Supporting decision-making in patient risk assessment using a hierarchical fuzzy model
    Jatoba, Alessandro
    Bellas, Hugo Cesar
    Koster, Isabella
    Burns, Catherine M.
    Vidal, Mario Cesar R.
    Grecco, Claudio Henrique S.
    de Carvalho, Paulo Victor R.
    COGNITION TECHNOLOGY & WORK, 2018, 20 (03) : 477 - 488
  • [3] A Model for the Evaluation of Critical IT Systems Using Multicriteria Decision-Making with Elements for Risk Assessment
    Macek, Davor
    Magdalenic, Ivan
    Begicevic Redep, Nina
    MATHEMATICS, 2021, 9 (09)
  • [4] A novel FMEA model based on fuzzy multiple-criteria decision-making methods for risk assessment
    Fattahi, Reza
    Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, Reza
    Khalilzadeh, Mohammad
    Shahsavari-Pour, Nasser
    Soltani, Roya
    JOURNAL OF ENTERPRISE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2020, 33 (05) : 881 - 904
  • [5] Tunnel safety, risk assessment and decision-making
    Beard, Alan N.
    TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 25 (01) : 91 - 94
  • [6] Risk assessment in decision-making on rainfed cotton
    Crétenet, M
    Mohtar, RH
    Moussa, AA
    CAHIERS AGRICULTURES, 2006, 15 (01): : 109 - 115
  • [7] Software obsolescence risk assessment approach using multicriteria decision-making
    Bowlds, Ted F.
    Fossaceca, John M.
    Iammartino, Ronald
    SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2018, 21 (05) : 455 - 465
  • [8] Research on information system assets risk assessment and defense decision-making
    Fu, Sha
    Zhou, Hang-jun
    Xiao, Ye-zhi
    JOURNAL OF AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE AND HUMANIZED COMPUTING, 2021, 14 (2) : 1229 - 1241
  • [9] Risk assessment in IT outsourcing using fuzzy decision-making approach: An Indian perspective
    Samantra, Chitrasen
    Datta, Saurav
    Mahapatra, Siba Shankar
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2014, 41 (08) : 4010 - 4022
  • [10] RISK ASSESSMENT OF BLASTING OPERATIONS IN OPEN PIT MINES USING FAHP METHOD
    Kiani, M.
    Hosseini, S. H.
    Taji, M.
    Gholinejad, M.
    MINING OF MINERAL DEPOSITS, 2019, 13 (03): : 76 - 86