Efficacy of valganciclovir prophylaxis in kidney transplant recipients following low-dose rituximab induction therapy: a multicenter retrospective study

被引:0
作者
Takehara, Tomohiro [1 ]
Nishida, Hayato [2 ]
Ichikawa, Kazunobu [1 ]
Nawano, Takaaki [1 ]
Takai, Satoshi [2 ]
Fukuhara, Hiroki [2 ]
Matsuura, Tomohiko [3 ]
Maita, Shinya [4 ]
Saito, Mitsuru [5 ]
Murakami, Reiichi [6 ]
Hatakeyama, Shingo [7 ]
Obara, Wataru [3 ]
Saitoh, Hisao [8 ]
Ohyama, Chikara [7 ]
Habuchi, Tomonori [5 ]
Watanabe, Masafumi [1 ]
Tsuchiya, Norihiko [2 ]
机构
[1] Yamagata Univ, Fac Med, Dept Cardiol Pulmonol & Nephrol, Yamagata, Japan
[2] Yamagata Univ, Fac Med, Dept Urol, 2-2-2 Iida Nishi, Yamagata 9909585, Japan
[3] Iwate Med Univ, Dept Urol, Morioka, Iwate, Japan
[4] Iwate Prefectural Isawa Hosp, Dept Urol, Oshu, Iwate, Japan
[5] Akita Univ, Dept Urol, Sch Med, Akita, Japan
[6] Hirosaki Univ, Sch Med, Dept Cardiol & Nephrol, Hirosaki, Aomori, Japan
[7] Hirosaki Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Hirosaki, Aomori, Japan
[8] Oyokyo Kidney Res Inst, Dept Urol, Hirosaki, Aomori, Japan
关键词
Kidney transplantation; Rituximab; Cytomegalovirus; Valganciclovir prophylaxis; LATE-ONSET NEUTROPENIA; CYTOMEGALOVIRUS-INFECTION; RENAL-TRANSPLANTATION; DISEASE; RISK; DONOR; IMMUNOSUPPRESSION; COMPLICATIONS; IMPACT; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1007/s10157-024-02578-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Rituximab (RIT) induction therapy is widely used for desensitization against ABO-incompatible living-donor kidney transplants (KT). However, the efficacy of valganciclovir (VGCV) prophylaxis against cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease and infection in KT recipients (KTRs) following RIT induction remains unclear. Methods The current multicenter retrospective study included 213 KTRs who received low-dose RIT induction between 1998 and 2021, across 6 facilities included in the Michinoku Renal Transplant Network (MRTN). VGCV dosage varied from 450 mg/day (twice weekly) to 900 mg/day (daily), with treatment durations of 3-12 months. The primary and secondary endpoints were the incidence of CMV disease and infection, respectively. Results The incidence of CMV disease was significantly higher in the VGCV group (23.5%; 16 patients) than in the non-VGCV group (5.5%; 8 patients) (p < 0.01). The incidence of CMV infection was 54.5% (79 patients) in the non-VGCV group and 48.5% (33 patients) in the VGCV group, with no significant difference (p = 0.42). In the subgroup of CMV-seronegative KTRs receiving allografts from CMV-seropositive donors (CMV IgG (D + /R-)), 18 out of 24 KTRs received VGCV prophylaxis, of whom 10 (55.6%) developed CMV disease. Within this subgroup, only 4 KTRs received VGCV with the standard protocol (900 mg daily for 6 months), and none developed CMV disease. Conclusion Insufficient VGCV prophylaxis does not reduce the incidence of CMV disease in KTRs following low-dose RIT induction. Despite concerns about leukopenia due to RIT and VGCV, in KTRs with CMV IgG (D+ /R-) serostatus, VGCV prophylaxis with a standard protocol may be advisable.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 367
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Drug-Induced Myelosuppression in Kidney Transplant Patients
    Abbas, Fedaey
    El Kossi, Mohsen
    Shaheen, Ihab Sakr
    Sharma, Ajay
    Halawa, Ahmed
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 19 (10) : 999 - 1013
  • [2] Rituximab-Related Late-Onset Neutropenia in Kidney Transplant Recipients Treated for Antibody-Mediated Acute Rejection
    Ahmadi, Fatemeh
    Dashti-Khavidaki, Simin
    Khatami, Mohammad-Reza
    Lessan-Pezeshki, Mahboob
    Khalili, Hossein
    Khosravi, Malihe
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 15 (04) : 414 - 419
  • [3] Delayed-onset primary cytomegalovirus disease and the risk of allograft failure and mortality after kidney transplantation
    Arthurs, Supha K.
    Eid, Albert J.
    Pedersen, Rachel A.
    Kremers, Walter K.
    Cosio, Fernando G.
    Patel, Robin
    Razonable, Raymund R.
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2008, 46 (06) : 840 - 846
  • [4] Cytomegalovirus risk factors in renal transplantation with modern immunosuppression
    Bataille, S.
    Moal, V.
    Gaudart, J.
    Indreies, M.
    Purgus, R.
    Dussol, B.
    Zandotti, C.
    Berland, Y.
    Vacher-Coponat, H.
    [J]. TRANSPLANT INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2010, 12 (06) : 480 - 488
  • [5] Cytomegalovirus disease is associated with higher all-cause mortality after lung transplantation despite extended antiviral prophylaxis
    Beam, E.
    Lesnick, T.
    Kremers, W.
    Kennedy, C. C.
    Razonable, R. R.
    [J]. CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 30 (03) : 270 - 278
  • [6] Brennan D C, 2011, Am J Transplant, V11, P2453, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03674.x
  • [7] Comparison of universal prophylaxis and preemptive approach for cytomegalovirus associated outcome measures in renal transplant patients: A meta-analysis of available data
    Caskurlu, Hulya
    Karadag, Fatma Y.
    Arslan, Ferhat
    Cag, Yasemin
    Vahaboglu, Haluk
    [J]. TRANSPLANT INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2019, 21 (01)
  • [8] The effectiveness and safety of rituximab as induction therapy in ABO-compatible non-sensitized renal transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Cheungpasitporn, Wisit
    Thongprayoon, Charat
    Edmonds, Peter J.
    Bruminhent, Jackrapong
    Tangdhanakanond, Kawin
    [J]. RENAL FAILURE, 2015, 37 (09) : 1522 - 1526
  • [9] New Developments in the Management of Cytomegalovirus Infection after Solid Organ Transplantation
    Eid, Albert J.
    Razonable, Raymund R.
    [J]. DRUGS, 2010, 70 (08) : 965 - 981
  • [10] Absolute Lymphocyte Count: A Predictor of Recurrent Cytomegalovirus Disease in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients
    Gardiner, Bradley J.
    Nierenberg, Natalie E.
    Chow, Jennifer K.
    Ruthazer, Robin
    Kent, David M.
    Snydman, David R.
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2018, 67 (09) : 1395 - 1402